|
|
|
|
|
This image has been retired.
Final Stats:
| Total Votes |
714 |
| Average Score |
3.74 |
| Verdict |
Not Rice
|
|
Picture
Information
|
| URL:
http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=1563 |
|
| Comments: 25 (Read/Post) Favorites: 0 (View) |
Submitted
on: 03-03-2002
|
 View Stats |
Category:
Car |
|
|
Description:
Here is the production version of the 2004 Chrysler Crossfire. It uses a Mercedes-Benz
3.2L V6 and RWD set-up. The rear-end is also much nicer than the |
Showing page: 1 of 2
[ 1 2 ]
 |
| #2 |
3-04-2002 @ 12:01:59 AM |
| Posted By : Jiffy |
Reply | Edit | Del |
cool. kind reminds me of a radical audi tt though...
[Edited by Jiffy on 3-04-2002 @ 12:05:10 AM]
|
|
| #3 |
3-04-2002 @ 12:04:47 AM |
| Posted By : nachobitch |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Yeah, looks like a mix between a TT and a PT Cruiser. Especially the grill.
|
|
| #8 |
3-14-2002 @ 12:56:29 AM |
| Posted By : Mad Max |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Not bad at all. What kind of horsepower does it have? And how much will it cost? Is this gonna be as good a deal as the Razor?
|
|
| #12 |
8-29-2002 @ 03:31:36 PM |
| Posted By : Skid |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I just hope they see a RWD car with the new Hemi soon. Supposedly, they are going to make a 2 door Charger, but it's not been confirmed.
PLEASE, Chrysler, make luxury equipment optional. I want a low base price on an all-business car.
|
|
| #13 |
8-29-2002 @ 03:38:46 PM |
| Posted By : comradesampo |
Reply | Edit | Del |
If they put the Charger name on anything other than a rear-drive two-door V8 someone's getting a bomb in the mail.
|
|
| #14 |
8-29-2002 @ 03:40:22 PM |
| Posted By : mr_mcmunkee |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#12, Sorry Skid, I wouldn't count on it...the engine, transmission, chassis, brakes, and electronics are all Mercedes Benz.
|
|
| #16 |
8-29-2002 @ 03:41:46 PM |
| Posted By : Skid |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I'm not talking about in this car, I'm talking about with the new Charger. I'm just saying if they're offering a rear wheel drive car again, maybe things are starting to look up.
|
|
| #17 |
8-29-2002 @ 03:43:15 PM |
| Posted By : comradesampo |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#15: Chrysler is more a luxury brand than a performance brand, isn't it?
|
|
| #18 |
8-29-2002 @ 03:46:17 PM |
| Posted By : mr_mcmunkee |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Yup...and Mercedes is just starting to make components of the Chrysler cars now even though they originally said they wouldn't because they thought the Chysler name "would tarnish the Mercedes reputation".
|
|
| #20 |
8-29-2002 @ 03:49:44 PM |
| Posted By : Skid |
Reply | Edit | Del |
What a lot of people overlook is that prior to the merger, Mercedes wasn't in much better shape than Chrysler, financial or quality-wise.
|
Showing page: 1 of 2
[ 1 2 ]
Login to leave a comment
|
|
|
|
|
