|
|
|
Go back and vote on this image.
Picture
Information
|
URL:
http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=16335 |
|
Comments: 38 (Read/Post) Favorites: 1 (View) |
Submitted
on: 12-19-2002
|
View Stats |
Category:
Off-topic |
|
Description:
I dunno about you but I don't believe this for a second. |
Showing page: 1 of 2 [ 1 2 ]
|
#2 |
12-19-2002 @ 08:39:50 PM |
Posted By : comradesampo |
Reply | Edit | Del |
No fucking way a 133MHz system bus would be stable at 194MHz. |
|
#4 |
12-19-2002 @ 10:16:50 PM |
Posted By : Obsidian |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#2, (i showed this to my brother plus the above comments - his responce is)
"where does it say that it is using 133Mhz?" |
|
#5 |
12-19-2002 @ 10:27:56 PM |
Posted By : comradesampo |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#4, 3060MHz (the original processor speed) divided by 23 (the hardcoded multiplier) = 133, the original system bus speed. |
|
#8 |
12-19-2002 @ 11:27:20 PM |
Posted By : StillRuns |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I believe the English. It's the Chinese I'm not falling for. |
|
#17 |
11-06-2003 @ 02:24:26 PM |
Posted By : mr_mcmunkee |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#15, 010101110001010101010101101011010001001101010101010010101001010100101
010101010101010101100001010101010100101010100101010100101010010101010
1111010101001010010101010101010!!!!!!!! |
Showing page: 1 of 2 [ 1 2 ]
Login to leave a comment
|
|
|
|
|