|
|
|
|
|
This image has been retired.
Final Stats:
| Total Votes |
719 |
| Average Score |
2.99 |
| Verdict |
Not Rice
|
|
Picture
Information
|
| URL:
http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=1742 |
|
| Comments: 40 (Read/Post) Favorites: 0 (View) |
Submitted
on: 03-07-2002
|
 View Stats |
Category:
Car |
|
|
Description:
The pinnacle of first-generation Mustangs... the 1970 Shelby GT-500. |
Showing page: 1 of 2
[ 1 2 ]
 |
| #1 |
3-07-2002 @ 10:23:28 AM |
| Posted By : Rice Boy |
Reply | Edit | Del |
ok, ok, don't we see enough Muscle Cars already? C'mon, we wanna see RICERS!!! Don't get me wrong, I love 'em but this site is dedicated for ricers! (oh and i get scared everytime i hear a Shelby GT . . .)
|
|
| #2 |
3-07-2002 @ 10:27:18 AM |
| Posted By : CRXtrackguy |
Reply | Edit | Del |
this site is called Rice or Not. Is this car rice? or isn't it? that's why we vote.
|
|
| #5 |
3-07-2002 @ 11:25:27 AM |
| Posted By : Skid |
Reply | Edit | Del |
That's a second gen Mustang. And I also think we should post less muscle cars. Not because they aren't cool (they're the coolest things on the site, in fact), but because I think we can safely agree that they ARE NOT rice.
|
|
| #7 |
3-07-2002 @ 11:32:34 AM |
| Posted By : Skid |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Well, that depends on whether or not you consider modern Mustangs and F-Bodies to be muscle cars (I don't).
|
|
| #9 |
3-07-2002 @ 11:39:39 AM |
| Posted By : Skid |
Reply | Edit | Del |
They're fuel injected, they aren't based on a cheaper coupe or sedan with a performance package, and they weren't built during the muscle car era. I can agree with those SORT of being muscle cars (more so than when people say the Viper is a musclecar-where does THAT come from?), but when someone says "muscle car", I think of machines like the one in this picture.
|
|
| #10 |
3-07-2002 @ 11:41:24 AM |
| Posted By : pluto316 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
When I think of a muscle car I think of a car that came from the factory with about 200% more hp than the body or normal driving conditions require.
|
|
| #11 |
3-07-2002 @ 11:42:51 AM |
| Posted By : SuperDave479 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Yep that's about like my car. Oh wait I have a 95 Z28. That means it's not a muscle car though. Hmm.
|
|
| #12 |
3-07-2002 @ 11:45:10 AM |
| Posted By : pluto316 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
But don't you think the NORMAL DRIVING of that car is "I HAVE A Z28, LET'S GO FAST!! VROOM!!"?
|
|
| #15 |
3-07-2002 @ 11:47:23 AM |
| Posted By : pluto316 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I know, it sounded really smart when I first typed it up, but the more I think about it, maybe my definition for a muscle car is a little off.
|
|
| #17 |
3-07-2002 @ 11:51:17 AM |
| Posted By : JAXS SILVERBABY |
Reply | Edit | Del |
SuperDave you are the driver it depends on. You know you love the SPEEEEED!!!!
|
|
| #19 |
3-07-2002 @ 10:48:19 PM |
| Posted By : Mad Max |
Reply | Edit | Del |
There are just certain cars that NO ONE can hate on, regardless of your brand loyalty. This, Yenko Camaros, AAR 'Cudas, you can't dislike them.
|
Showing page: 1 of 2
[ 1 2 ]
Login to leave a comment
|
|
|
|
|
