|
|
|
|
|
This image has expired.
Final Stats:
| Total Votes |
92 |
| Average Score |
2.60 |
| Verdict |
Not Rice
|
|
Picture
Information
|
| URL:
http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=19602 |
|
| Comments: 28 (Read/Post) Favorites: 1 (View) |
Submitted
on: 02-28-2003
|
 View Stats |
Category:
Car |
|
|
Description:
great shot |
Showing page: 1 of 2
[ 1 2 ]
 |
| #9 |
2-28-2003 @ 02:55:37 PM |
| Posted By : solid_snake |
Reply | Edit | Del |
as a child of the 80s I must say that I prefer black t/as
|
|
| #11 |
2-28-2003 @ 02:58:34 PM |
| Posted By : Biohazard |
Reply | Edit | Del |
its suprising how rare clean looking ones like this are. At least here anyway.
|
|
| #12 |
2-28-2003 @ 03:01:27 PM |
| Posted By : ambientFLIER |
Reply | Edit | Del |
turbo t/a's are slow tho...the only quick ones were the later 3.8's
|
|
| #15 |
2-28-2003 @ 03:09:34 PM |
| Posted By : ambientFLIER |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#13 no its because the engine/turbo were very poorly designed, and the turbo barely put out more power than the normal n/a engine
|
|
| #20 |
2-28-2003 @ 06:07:03 PM |
| Posted By : Low-Tech Redneck |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#13, Actualy, they weren't any heavier than any other F-body, the problem was that the 305 didn't make the best platform for a turbocharged engine for a fast car, but due to emissions/economics, it was the best they had
Still, from 70'-72' and 77' - 79' I'll take any Trans Am, sight unseen :-)
|
Showing page: 1 of 2
[ 1 2 ]
Login to leave a comment
|
|
|
|
|
