Go to car


Latest Comments
Car: 91935   By: DiRF   Comment: "I actually kinda liked these when they came out, b..."
Car: 85938   By: DiRF   Comment: "Normally I can find aspects of a squarish, blocky ..."
Car: 96594   By: Skid   Comment: "If I could have any 911, it would be the short-nos..."
Car: 44941   By: DiRF   Comment: "So, North Wilkesboro has been refurbished, and ret..."
Car: 96905   By: Adambomb   Comment: "This things been sitting at an oil change place ne..."
See last 25 comments
 Go to

Next picture
Ricecop Home
Linkage
Plates
Bling Bling
Photo
Free Post

 Top 10

Top 10 Ricers
Top 10 Non-Ricers
Top 10 Other Good
Top 10 Other Bad

 New & Retired

Newest Images
Retired Images

 Other

Submit a picture
Profile Lookup
FAQ
Site Log
Leader Board
Site Stats

 Online Now

0 Ricecops
1 Guests

Detailed List

 Login

Username:

Password:


Remember Login?

Sign up!
Why sign up?
Forgot my password


View this image at full size
Click here to let us know if the image above is broken.


Go back and vote on this image.

Picture Information
URL: http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=20433
Submitted by: ambientFLIER
Comments: 23  (Read/Post)     Favorites: 0  (View)
Submitted on: 03-16-2003
View Stats Category: Caption Contest
Description:
which one would you pick?


   Comments

Showing page: 1 of 2
[
1 2 ]

#1
3-16-2003 @ 11:53:34 PM
Posted By : ambientFLIER Reply | Edit | Del
RX8
Votes for this entry: 2

#2
3-16-2003 @ 11:53:43 PM
Posted By : ambientFLIER Reply | Edit | Del
G35
Votes for this entry: 6

#3
3-16-2003 @ 11:53:54 PM
Posted By : ambientFLIER Reply | Edit | Del
COBRA
Votes for this entry: 9

#4
3-16-2003 @ 11:54:26 PM
Posted By : ambientFLIER Reply | Edit | Del
my pick, since i can't vote on my own comments, would be the G35

#5
3-16-2003 @ 11:55:31 PM
Posted By : DiRF  Reply | Edit | Del
(edit): Ne'ermind. I get what ambient meant.

[Edited by DiRF on 3-16-2003 @ 11:57:01 PM]


#6
3-16-2003 @ 11:59:56 PM
Posted By : solid_snake Reply | Edit | Del
if it was a RX-7 I might have picked it, but in all honesty would anyone expect me to pick anything but the cobra?

#7
3-17-2003 @ 12:01:21 AM
Posted By : DiRF  Reply | Edit | Del
Oh wait...we're only supposed to vote once? Whoops...oh well, can't change it, my votes for the G35 and Cobra will have to stay...

#8
3-17-2003 @ 11:19:08 AM
Posted By : stang392 Reply | Edit | Del
hands down, cobra

#9
3-17-2003 @ 01:33:17 PM
Posted By : ambientFLIER Reply | Edit | Del
the RX8 still came in first place in the car and driver test, and the cobra in last, even with an extra 250lb-ft :P

#10
3-17-2003 @ 01:35:14 PM
Posted By : Skid Reply | Edit | Del
#9, That's because Car and Driver didn't think it was comfortable. They did mention that it was the most fun to get down in. In a sports car, luxury be damned, I want FUN FUN FUN.

#11
3-17-2003 @ 01:35:59 PM
Posted By : solid_snake Reply | Edit | Del
last I checked we weren't car and driver :P

#12
3-17-2003 @ 01:36:40 PM
Posted By : Skid Reply | Edit | Del
#11, This is the Car and Driver test from the newest issue we're talking about here.

[Edited by Skid on 3-17-2003 @ 01:37:02 PM]


#13
3-17-2003 @ 01:39:24 PM
Posted By : DiRF  Reply | Edit | Del
The RX8 is ugly as sin, IMO. The Mustang looks great, and the G35 looks pretty good too.

The side-window profile on the RX8 is just wrong and disproportionate, the "pseudo 4 door" treatment just doesn't look right.


#14
3-17-2003 @ 01:39:40 PM
Posted By : solid_snake Reply | Edit | Del
#12, I realise that, and I gave up on car and driver because of there bizzare comparisons of sports cars in which the fastest comes in last

#15
3-17-2003 @ 01:41:20 PM
Posted By : solid_snake Reply | Edit | Del
#13, Yeah the RX8 just doesn't look right to me

#16
3-17-2003 @ 01:41:40 PM
Posted By : ambientFLIER Reply | Edit | Del
#14 this wasnt an all-out sports car comparison, it was a sport-coupe comparo (it was more luxury/cruise oriented)

#17
3-17-2003 @ 01:43:28 PM
Posted By : Skid Reply | Edit | Del
I don't like the RX8 because it's a four door. It's another pathetic attempt to make sports cars for families.

Why do automakers insist on making cars that can do everything? Good performance, lots of doodads that break in 3 years, and lots of cargo space, all in the same package? When are they going to realize that NO ONE drives just one car anymore? Most all families (hell, most all individuals) have more than one car now, because unless you live in an urban environment with public transport, you can't rely on just one car all the time. Why not make different cars for different things, the way it's always been done?

Votes for this entry: 4

#18
3-17-2003 @ 01:44:04 PM
Posted By : Skid Reply | Edit | Del
#17, Sorry, that wasn't meant to be an entry.

#19
3-17-2003 @ 01:45:21 PM
Posted By : solid_snake Reply | Edit | Del
#16, I seem to remember some "all-out sports car comparisons" where the slowest car "won"

#20
3-17-2003 @ 01:47:46 PM
Posted By : DiRF  Reply | Edit | Del
#18, I ain't gonna change it, because I absolutely agree, and voted on it.

I fucking HATE crossover vehicles that try to be sporty. Either a car is sporty or practical. When you try going in between, you [usually] get a car that looks rather odd, and doesn't succeed in either area as well as a cheaper car developed for ONE use. I get kinda extreme with this, because I hate 4 door sedans, with a passion. They're boring looking, never look sporty, no matter HOW hard you try, and they're not as practical as a hatchback, station wagon, or pickup.


Showing page: 1 of 2
[
1 2 ]


Login to leave a comment

Classifieds 
Click here to post your own classified ad






Want to send some feedback? Click here.

Server time: Thursday, March 28, 2024 06:35:19 AM

All pictures on this site are property of their respective owners.
Copyright © 2000 - 2024 Ricecop. All rights reserved.