Go to car


Latest Comments
Car: 87847   By: Obsidian   Comment: "Considering how Datsun made it - it looks more lik..."
Car: 48539   By: wannabemustangjockey   Comment: "That moment when you go into the drive thru the wr..."
Car: 81289   By: wannabemustangjockey   Comment: "Unpopular opinion: I really like the styling of th..."
Car: 87847   By: wannabemustangjockey   Comment: "As in "Austin Allegro Estate" kind of British?..."
Car: 87847   By: DiRF   Comment: "Not the prettiest belle at the ball... the rear qu..."
See last 25 comments
 Go to

Next picture
Ricecop Home
Linkage
Plates
Bling Bling
Photo
Free Post

 Top 10

Top 10 Ricers
Top 10 Non-Ricers
Top 10 Other Good
Top 10 Other Bad

 New & Retired

Newest Images
Retired Images

 Other

Submit a picture
Profile Lookup
FAQ
Site Log
Leader Board
Site Stats

 Online Now

0 Ricecops
1 Guests

Detailed List

 Login

Username:

Password:


Remember Login?

Sign up!
Why sign up?
Forgot my password


View this image at full size
Click here to let us know if the image above is broken.


Go back and vote on this image.

Picture Information
URL: http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=27140
Submitted by: Lemming
Comments: 56  (Read/Post)     Favorites: 3  (View)
Submitted on: 09-14-2003
View Stats Category: Car
Description:
Nice RX7 I saw this evening.


   Comments

Showing page: 1 of 3
[
1 2 3 ]

#1
9-14-2003 @ 06:56:09 PM
Posted By : Lemming Reply | Edit | Del
Best bodystyle ever.

#2
9-14-2003 @ 06:59:32 PM
Posted By : solid_snake Reply | Edit | Del
I concur, well this or the '69-'70 fastback mustangs :)

#3
9-14-2003 @ 07:28:26 PM
Posted By : Lemming Reply | Edit | Del
#2, The 71-73s get no love. :-(

#4
9-14-2003 @ 07:32:15 PM
Posted By : DiRF  Reply | Edit | Del
#3, The '71-'73s are my favorites right behind the Fox-bodies.

For me, here's my ranks:

1. '79-'93
2. '71-'73
3. '94-'98
4. '68-'70
5. '99-'94
6. '64-'67
7. '74-'78


#5
9-14-2003 @ 08:16:11 PM
Posted By : solid_snake Reply | Edit | Del
#4, you know that some of those have multiple body styles right?

#6
9-14-2003 @ 08:17:44 PM
Posted By : solid_snake Reply | Edit | Del
#5, and that it doesn't make alot of sense

#7
9-14-2003 @ 08:18:26 PM
Posted By : Lemming Reply | Edit | Del
#5, I think his #5 was a typo for '99-'04, since he already listed '94-'98. Other than that..?

#8
9-14-2003 @ 08:20:48 PM
Posted By : stang392 Reply | Edit | Del
#4, me
1. 69-70
2. 87-93
3. 74-78
4. 64-68
5. 79-86
6. 71-73
7. 94-98
8. 99-04


#9
9-14-2003 @ 08:23:21 PM
Posted By : solid_snake Reply | Edit | Del
#7, that was the main thing, also '67 was different that '64 1/2-'66 cars and '68s are different than '69-'70 cars. and there are 2 diffent styles in '19-'93 aswell

#10
9-14-2003 @ 08:23:45 PM
Posted By : Lemming Reply | Edit | Del
1. 71-03
2. 99-04
3. 79-93 (esp. GTs)
4. 69-70

And if it's anything else, I kind of lose interest unless it's really unique. The first-gen cars do nothing for me, Pintostangs are pretty bland (STOCK), and the first run of SN95s suffer from the "jellybean" styling Ford was using on everything during the mid 90's.


#11
9-14-2003 @ 08:24:47 PM
Posted By : Lemming Reply | Edit | Del
#9, I really don't see much difference between the Fox-bodies. Some of 'em had square lights, some didn't. I still think of them as having the same bodystyle.

#12
9-14-2003 @ 08:26:17 PM
Posted By : stang392 Reply | Edit | Del
#11, yeah but you also have different side windows, and the noses really set the two apart.

#13
9-14-2003 @ 08:26:51 PM
Posted By : solid_snake Reply | Edit | Del
mine
1.'69-'70
2. '67-'68
3. '87-'93
4. '99-'04
5. '94-'98
6. '71-'73
7, '64 1/2-'66
8. '79-'86
9. '74-'78


#14
9-14-2003 @ 08:27:36 PM
Posted By : Lemming Reply | Edit | Del
#10, And more generally, some of the more attractive cars in recent memory would definitely have to include the RX7, such as the one pictured here. I'm also partial to the 2nd-gen DSMs (when not molested by riceboys), MKIV Toyota Supras, Lexus SC300/400s, '92-'96ish Honda Preludes, and the 3000GT/Stealth.

ed: And I almost forgot: Nissan 240SX's, especially the first ones based on the S13 and the very last ones with the slanty headlights.

[Edited by Lemming on 9-14-2003 @ 08:29:11 PM]


#15
9-14-2003 @ 08:28:19 PM
Posted By : solid_snake Reply | Edit | Del
yeah, they really look different side by side

#16
9-14-2003 @ 08:28:23 PM
Posted By : Adambomb Reply | Edit | Del
me
1. 67-70
2. 87-93
3. 64-66
4. 71-73
5. 94-98
6. 99-04
7. 79-86
8. 74-78
I like em all though

[Edited by Adambomb on 9-14-2003 @ 08:30:26 PM]


#17
9-14-2003 @ 08:34:50 PM
Posted By : Adambomb Reply | Edit | Del
oh yeah and I add 80-81 to the bottom of the list

#18
9-14-2003 @ 08:36:34 PM
Posted By : Adambomb Reply | Edit | Del
hmmm just looked it up apparently 80-81 mustangs DID have a V8 engine availible but it sucked. but 74 was the only Mustang without a V8 so i'll put it at the bottom

[Edited by Adambomb on 9-14-2003 @ 08:37:56 PM]


#19
9-14-2003 @ 08:41:49 PM
Posted By : solid_snake Reply | Edit | Del
the '80-'81 mustangs sucked hard, ~120 from a 4.2 V8

#20
9-14-2003 @ 08:47:50 PM
Posted By : stang392 Reply | Edit | Del
#19, only ford on hot rods worst v8 list

Showing page: 1 of 3
[
1 2 3 ]


Login to leave a comment

Classifieds 
Click here to post your own classified ad






Want to send some feedback? Click here.

Server time: Sunday, December 17, 2017 08:28:06 PM

All pictures on this site are property of their respective owners.
Copyright 2000 - 2017 Ricecop. All rights reserved.