|
|
|
|
|
Go back and vote on this image.
|
Picture
Information
|
| URL:
http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=27140 |
|
| Comments: 56 (Read/Post) Favorites: 3 (View) |
Submitted
on: 09-14-2003
|
 View Stats |
Category:
Car |
|
|
Description:
Nice RX7 I saw this evening. |
Showing page: 1 of 3
[ 1 2 3 ]
 |
| #2 |
9-14-2003 @ 06:59:32 PM |
| Posted By : solid_snake |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I concur, well this or the '69-'70 fastback mustangs :)
|
|
| #7 |
9-14-2003 @ 08:18:26 PM |
| Posted By : Lemming |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#5, I think his #5 was a typo for '99-'04, since he already listed '94-'98. Other than that..?
|
|
| #8 |
9-14-2003 @ 08:20:48 PM |
| Posted By : stang392 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#4, me
1. 69-70
2. 87-93
3. 74-78
4. 64-68
5. 79-86
6. 71-73
7. 94-98
8. 99-04
|
|
| #9 |
9-14-2003 @ 08:23:21 PM |
| Posted By : solid_snake |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#7, that was the main thing, also '67 was different that '64 1/2-'66 cars and '68s are different than '69-'70 cars. and there are 2 diffent styles in '19-'93 aswell
|
|
| #10 |
9-14-2003 @ 08:23:45 PM |
| Posted By : Lemming |
Reply | Edit | Del |
1. 71-03
2. 99-04
3. 79-93 (esp. GTs)
4. 69-70
And if it's anything else, I kind of lose interest unless it's really unique. The first-gen cars do nothing for me, Pintostangs are pretty bland (STOCK), and the first run of SN95s suffer from the "jellybean" styling Ford was using on everything during the mid 90's.
|
|
| #11 |
9-14-2003 @ 08:24:47 PM |
| Posted By : Lemming |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#9, I really don't see much difference between the Fox-bodies. Some of 'em had square lights, some didn't. I still think of them as having the same bodystyle.
|
|
| #12 |
9-14-2003 @ 08:26:17 PM |
| Posted By : stang392 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#11, yeah but you also have different side windows, and the noses really set the two apart.
|
|
| #13 |
9-14-2003 @ 08:26:51 PM |
| Posted By : solid_snake |
Reply | Edit | Del |
mine
1.'69-'70
2. '67-'68
3. '87-'93
4. '99-'04
5. '94-'98
6. '71-'73
7, '64 1/2-'66
8. '79-'86
9. '74-'78
|
|
| #14 |
9-14-2003 @ 08:27:36 PM |
| Posted By : Lemming |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#10, And more generally, some of the more attractive cars in recent memory would definitely have to include the RX7, such as the one pictured here. I'm also partial to the 2nd-gen DSMs (when not molested by riceboys), MKIV Toyota Supras, Lexus SC300/400s, '92-'96ish Honda Preludes, and the 3000GT/Stealth.
ed: And I almost forgot: Nissan 240SX's, especially the first ones based on the S13 and the very last ones with the slanty headlights.
[Edited by Lemming on 9-14-2003 @ 08:29:11 PM]
|
|
| #16 |
9-14-2003 @ 08:28:23 PM |
| Posted By : Adambomb |
Reply | Edit | Del |
me
1. 67-70
2. 87-93
3. 64-66
4. 71-73
5. 94-98
6. 99-04
7. 79-86
8. 74-78
I like em all though
[Edited by Adambomb on 9-14-2003 @ 08:30:26 PM]
|
|
| #17 |
9-14-2003 @ 08:34:50 PM |
| Posted By : Adambomb |
Reply | Edit | Del |
oh yeah and I add 80-81 to the bottom of the list
|
|
| #18 |
9-14-2003 @ 08:36:34 PM |
| Posted By : Adambomb |
Reply | Edit | Del |
hmmm just looked it up apparently 80-81 mustangs DID have a V8 engine availible but it sucked. but 74 was the only Mustang without a V8 so i'll put it at the bottom
[Edited by Adambomb on 9-14-2003 @ 08:37:56 PM]
|
Showing page: 1 of 3
[ 1 2 3 ]
Login to leave a comment
|
|
|
|
|
