Go to car	Latest Comments Car: 95884   By: Skid   Comment: "Someone released Mulholland Drive as a track....11..." Car: 98674   By: Skid   Comment: "Given the very low point Trans Ams performance was..." Car: 98675   By: Skid   Comment: "I'm forever on the hunt for the XK140 dropheads th..." Car: 98673   By: Skid   Comment: "Now THAT is a cool find. I love the British Fords..." Car: 43287   By: Skid   Comment: "Whoo boy, there's a memory......" See last 25 comments
Go to Next picture Ricecop Home Linkage Plates Bling Bling Photo Free Post  Top 10 Top 10 Ricers Top 10 Non-Ricers Top 10 Other Good Top 10 Other Bad  New & Retired Newest Images Retired Images  Other Submit a picture Profile Lookup FAQ Site Log Leader Board Site Stats  Online Now 0 Ricecops 1 Guests Detailed List  Login Username: Password: Remember Login? Sign up! Why sign up? Forgot my password	View this image at full size Click here to let us know if the image above is broken. Go back and vote on this image. Picture Information URL: http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=28147 Submitted by: Obsidian Comments: 7  (Read/Post)     Favorites: 0  (View) Submitted on: 10-30-2003 View Stats Category: Other Vehicle Description: 2004 Cadillac SRX Black Diamond concept.    Comments Showing page: 1 of 1 [ 1 ] #1 10-30-2003 @ 09:31:05 PM Posted By : thirtyseven Reply | Edit | Del Not rice. Not useful either #2 10-30-2003 @ 09:35:59 PM Posted By : DiRF  Reply | Edit | Del It's not really meant to be an SUV...it's really a tall wagon, which is actually quite practical... it's based on the CTS, so it's V8, RWD, with AWD optional, not bad in my opinion. It won in a comparison test versus the Porsche Cayenne and Infiniti FX45. #3 10-30-2003 @ 09:37:57 PM Posted By : thirtyseven Reply | Edit | Del #2, Well as long as its RWD and not trying to be an SUV, I quite like it. I prefer the FX's styling, though. #4 10-31-2003 @ 12:44:26 PM Posted By : Jurrell Reply | Edit | Del I'll take 2 please #5 10-31-2003 @ 02:27:36 PM Posted By : ambientFLIER Reply | Edit | Del #2, got a link? you mean this thing is faster than the fx45? #6 10-31-2003 @ 02:30:12 PM Posted By : DiRF  Reply | Edit | Del #5, Comparison tests just aren't performance, but yes, I was very fast. It was in Car&Driver, and I don't have it handy right now to see if it WAS faster. #7 11-03-2003 @ 11:03:35 AM Posted By : mr_mcmunkee Reply | Edit | Del *NOT A TRUCK* Showing page: 1 of 1 [ 1 ] Login to leave a comment	Classifieds  Click here to post your own classified ad

Want to send some feedback? Click here.
Server time: Friday, April 19, 2024 02:23:46 PM

All pictures on this site are property of their respective owners.
Copyright © 2000 - 2024 Ricecop. All rights reserved.