|
|
|
Go back and vote on this image.
Picture
Information
|
URL:
http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=36759 |
|
Comments: 20 (Read/Post) Favorites: 0 (View) |
Submitted
on: 11-13-2004
|
View Stats |
Category:
Photoshop/Art |
|
Description:
C6 Z06. Accoding to several Corvette web pages this will be the official Z06 for 2006. |
Showing page: 1 of 1 [ 1 ]
|
#1 |
11-13-2004 @ 01:39:19 AM |
Posted By : 427 Vette |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Some info:
6-piston front and 4-piston rear calipers
• Cross-drilled rotors
• Aluminum engine block with 104.8-mm bores and pressed-in liners
• Forged steel crankshaft with 101.6-mm stroke
• 6-bolt, forged steel main bearing caps
• Titanium connecting rods
• Cast aluminum flat-top pistons
• Racing-derived CNC-ported aluminum cylinder heads with 70-cc chambers
• 56mm titanium intake valves
• 41mm sodium-filled exhaust valves
• 11.0:1 compression ratio
• Composite manifold with 90 mm single-bore throttle body
• Camshaft with 15-mm (.591-inch) lift
• Dry-sump oiling system
• 7000-rpm redline
WEIGHT: 3130lbs/1420kg
500hp/475lb-ft torque.
[Edited by 427 Vette on 11-13-2004 @ 01:39:31 AM] |
|
#4 |
11-13-2004 @ 12:31:34 PM |
Posted By : Skid |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I don't care too much for the hp/torque ratio, though. And the C6 headlights still irk me. They need a shiny backing or something. |
|
#5 |
11-13-2004 @ 12:41:07 PM |
Posted By : Lemming |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Bah, nothing wrong with having more hp than torque. Just needs some deep gearing. :) |
|
#7 |
11-13-2004 @ 12:44:27 PM |
Posted By : Skid |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#5, Yeah, but then you have to downshift two gears during the slightest incline.
Well, I mean I'm exaggerating. That's more like Honda S2000 territory. 475 ft. lbs. wouldn't require that, it's just less than I'd want in a 500 hp car. Then again, I've always been a little more of a Viper guy. |
|
#8 |
11-13-2004 @ 03:09:02 PM |
Posted By : ImRaptor |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#7, Sure wouldn't catch me complaining about "only" having 475ft lbs in a car this light. |
|
#10 |
11-13-2004 @ 09:17:22 PM |
Posted By : Tastycakemix |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#4, yea, I don't feel the headlights at all. I cant get used to them either. I'd put aftermarkets on them. |
|
#12 |
11-13-2004 @ 09:21:19 PM |
Posted By : DA_MAISTA |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Is there a special reason why the Z06 uses the more ugly rear-window instead of the coupe Version? |
|
#14 |
11-13-2004 @ 09:36:27 PM |
Posted By : DA_MAISTA |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#13, Thanks for the info... but I find it extremely ugly! Like smearing shit onto an already ugly ...like... roachcake or something! And I am drunk, which makes my english even worse and the Z06 too and... ah, well. |
|
#16 |
11-13-2004 @ 09:41:56 PM |
Posted By : Biohazard |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#15, *walks in with facefull of McDonalds hamburger*
Huh? What did I miss? :P |
|
#18 |
11-13-2004 @ 09:47:44 PM |
Posted By : DA_MAISTA |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#15, I guess, its straight out of the poop-chute... (Meself iz learning da english from da porn-sites!)
Dont know... was in the Corvette NFS3 Racing-Team... loved that Bodystyle. Maybe its rooted deeper, though, compare the Cabin roofs of the WW2 Fighter planes, FW190 v. P51/P47. The american fighters look more Z06ish on their backs. |
|
#20 |
11-13-2004 @ 09:53:39 PM |
Posted By : DA_MAISTA |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#19, Its the same with the P51 as it is with the Corvette. First there was the normal version (P51B and C), the the performance Version (P51D), which was better, but the nice Coupe lines were lost. |
Showing page: 1 of 1 [ 1 ]
Login to leave a comment
|
|
|
|
|