Ricecop's Rice Or Not?

Latest Comments

Car: 37161	By: DiRF	Comment: "As a piggyback on that... still on my vacation in ..."
Car: 37161	By: DiRF	Comment: "So, apparently, Kranefuss wasn't the only team o..."
Car: 78637	By: DiRF	Comment: "Welp, Renault-Samsung Motors doesn't exist as a br..."
Car: Fpost	By: DiRF	Comment: "Just got in today. Will hit the Hall of Fame tomor..."
Car: Fpost	By: ricerocketboy	Comment: "sweet :D I have never done that. :) Hows is it?..."

See last 25 comments

Go to
Next picture Ricecop Home Linkage Plates Bling Bling Photo Free Post

Top 10
Top 10 Ricers Top 10 Non-Ricers Top 10 Other Good Top 10 Other Bad

New & Retired
Newest Images Retired Images

Other
Submit a picture Profile Lookup FAQ Site Log Leader Board Site Stats

Online Now
0 Ricecops 1 Guests Detailed List

This image has expired.

Final Stats:

Total Votes	53
Average Score	1.40
Verdict	Not Rice

Picture Information
URL: http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=41047	Submitted by: 427 Vette
Comments: 16 (Read/Post) Favorites: 1 (View)	Submitted on: 06-06-2005
View Stats	Category: Car

Description: Ferrari 288 GTO. Full-res: http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v...Cars/288GTO.jpg http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v...288GTOfront.jpg http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v...TOfrontside.jpg

Showing page: 1 of 1
[ 1 ]


#1	6-06-2005 @ 10:22:15 AM
Posted By : DiRF	Reply \| Edit \| Del
Thank you.


#2	6-06-2005 @ 10:58:12 AM
Posted By : Sensekhmet	Reply \| Edit \| Del
#1, I think normal 288 looks better starts digging a foxhole :)


#3	6-06-2005 @ 11:26:13 AM
Posted By : DiRF	Reply \| Edit \| Del
#2, There's a NORMAL non-GTO 288?! I am unaware of this.


#4	6-06-2005 @ 11:31:25 AM
Posted By : 427 Vette	Reply \| Edit \| Del
The only 288s I know is this one, and the 288 Evo racecar.


#5	6-06-2005 @ 11:38:13 AM
Posted By : DiRF	Reply \| Edit \| Del
#4, But from what I understand, the racecar was considered a "GTO" also... shrugs shoulders


#6	6-06-2005 @ 11:38:56 AM
Posted By : 427 Vette	Reply \| Edit \| Del
#5, Yes.


#7	6-06-2005 @ 05:52:04 PM
Posted By : thirtyseven	Reply \| Edit \| Del
I assume he meant the 208?


#8	6-07-2005 @ 05:11:19 AM
Posted By : Sensekhmet	Reply \| Edit \| Del
#7, Uh... Yea.


#9	6-07-2005 @ 06:14:40 PM
Posted By : thirtyseven	Reply \| Edit \| Del
#8, I used to get them confused too :)


#10	6-07-2005 @ 07:09:58 PM
Posted By : 427 Vette	Reply \| Edit \| Del
#7, I think he meant the 308.


#11	6-07-2005 @ 07:30:42 PM
Posted By : thirtyseven	Reply \| Edit \| Del
#10, Oops. 308.


#12	6-07-2005 @ 07:41:52 PM
Posted By : Hoopd87	Reply \| Edit \| Del
328?:p


#13	6-07-2005 @ 07:46:42 PM
Posted By : DiRF	Reply \| Edit \| Del
#12, 420? :P


#14	3-29-2015 @ 04:16:19 AM
Posted By : ricerocketboy	Reply \| Edit \| Del
Nope there was a 208 as well. Obviously not a GTO, though. It had a sub 2.0L V8 that produced about 150 horses in nonturbo form. The 208GTSi produced 220 horses IIRC. The 208 was replaced by the far-more-common 308 in 1986 or 1987, I can't remember which.


#15	3-29-2015 @ 12:28:43 PM
Posted By : Skid	Reply \| Edit \| Del
The 208 was only sold new in Italy and New Zealand, IIRC. It was sold concurrently with the 308, and both were replaced with the 328.


#16	3-29-2015 @ 12:40:23 PM
Posted By : ricerocketboy	Reply \| Edit \| Del
#15, 208 was also sold in the US, I think, as well. Wait, nope, you're right.

Showing page: 1 of 1
[ 1 ]

Login to leave a comment

	Classifieds
Click here to post your own classified ad

Want to send some feedback? Click here.
Server time: Thursday, April 25, 2024 09:07:01 AM

All pictures on this site are property of their respective owners.
Copyright � 2000 - 2024 Ricecop. All rights reserved.