|
|
|
|
|
This image has expired.
Final Stats:
| Total Votes |
422 |
| Average Score |
6.17 |
| Verdict |
Rice
|
|
Picture
Information
|
| URL:
http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=4289 |
|
| Comments: 16 (Read/Post) Favorites: 2 (View) |
Submitted
on: 04-16-2002
|
 View Stats |
Category:
Car |
|
|
Description:
Read the plates they are true, need I say more. |
Showing page: 1 of 1
[ 1 ]
 |
| #2 |
4-19-2002 @ 11:43:20 PM |
| Posted By : Mad Max |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Nice car, nice power, but I still HATE HATE HATE the stickers.
|
|
| #3 |
4-26-2002 @ 11:44:39 AM |
| Posted By : cams116 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Well in this case the sticker is alright as it is advertising a sponser. But damn I really dont like 2door R33s.
|
|
| #4 |
4-26-2002 @ 12:08:17 PM |
| Posted By : Mad Max |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I don't mean the big sponsor sticker, I mean the shopping list behind the front wheelwell. But I really don't think that's a sponsor sticker, I think that's a riceboy going overboard with the decals. I've seen lots of them with decals that bad.
|
|
| #6 |
4-26-2002 @ 12:12:19 PM |
| Posted By : Mad Max |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Indeed they are. I really like this car, except for the stickers.
|
|
| #7 |
6-20-2002 @ 02:54:35 AM |
| Posted By : cams116 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Hes no rice boy he races (legal road rallies) this and hes about 50. And they are sponser stickers. Just instead of them paying him he paid less for the goods I belive.
|
|
| #8 |
6-28-2002 @ 10:15:10 PM |
| Posted By : Skid |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I don't mind the purple down the side (black and purple go great together), but damn at that shopping list on his front fender.
|
|
| #9 |
6-30-2002 @ 10:20:41 PM |
| Posted By : CRXtrackguy |
Reply | Edit | Del |
If he's a sponsored racer, they're fine by me. I still don't like R33s. They look fine, but mechanically they're not as good as the R32 and R34.
|
|
| #11 |
8-19-2002 @ 10:45:09 AM |
| Posted By : cams116 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Just so you all know, I saw this the other day, and all of the stickers were gone from what I could see.
|
|
| #12 |
8-19-2002 @ 10:51:28 AM |
| Posted By : mr_mcmunkee |
Reply | Edit | Del |
HAHAHA! This weekend my wife and I were on the highway to visit her family and we passed a burgandy Intrepid, older body style. It had a GT-R emblem on the back and I was busting up out loud. My wife asked what I was laughing at and I told her that the Dodge beside of us has a Nissan emblem on the back and she said "Why are people so stupid! I wouldn't put a Firebird thing on my Sunfire? Why do people have to ruin their cars!?"
I married a smart woman. :)
|
|
| #13 |
9-16-2002 @ 02:04:21 PM |
| Posted By : Skid |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I still don't know the difference between a R32 R33 and R34. They're all just Skylines to me.
|
|
| #14 |
9-18-2002 @ 12:04:18 AM |
| Posted By : cams116 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#13, The R32 is the first with real performace. Its still the lightest of all skylines, it had the RB20 series of engines, inline 6cyl 2L turbo and non turbo versions. Then there was the R32 GTR, this had a RB26DETT, 2.6L inline 6cyl twin turbo, insane that car.
R33, heaviest of all skylines, had the RB25 series of engines, 2.5L inline 6cyl, turbo and non turbo versions. Once again the GTR had a RB26.
R34, pretty much the same as the R33, but lighter.
|
Showing page: 1 of 1
[ 1 ]
Login to leave a comment
|
|
|
|
|
