Ricecop's Rice Or Not?

Latest Comments

Car: 37161	By: DiRF	Comment: "As a piggyback on that... still on my vacation in ..."
Car: 37161	By: DiRF	Comment: "So, apparently, Kranefuss wasn't the only team o..."
Car: 78637	By: DiRF	Comment: "Welp, Renault-Samsung Motors doesn't exist as a br..."
Car: Fpost	By: DiRF	Comment: "Just got in today. Will hit the Hall of Fame tomor..."
Car: Fpost	By: ricerocketboy	Comment: "sweet :D I have never done that. :) Hows is it?..."

See last 25 comments

Go to
Next picture Ricecop Home Linkage Plates Bling Bling Photo Free Post

Top 10
Top 10 Ricers Top 10 Non-Ricers Top 10 Other Good Top 10 Other Bad

New & Retired
Newest Images Retired Images

Other
Submit a picture Profile Lookup FAQ Site Log Leader Board Site Stats

Online Now
1 Ricecops 1 Guests Detailed List

This image has expired.

Final Stats:

Total Votes	61
Average Score	1.46
Verdict	Not Rice

Picture Information
URL: http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=45708	Submitted by: Adambomb
Comments: 14 (Read/Post) Favorites: 1 (View)	Submitted on: 10-23-2005
View Stats	Category: Car

Description: '65 Shelby GT350.

Showing page: 1 of 1
[ 1 ]


#1	10-23-2005 @ 09:37:31 PM
Posted By : Subourbon187	Reply \| Edit \| Del
Among the best mustangs ever made.


#2	8-06-2008 @ 10:07:00 AM
Posted By : MxCx	Reply \| Edit \| Del
I dont find early 1st gen Mustangs attractive anymore. runs


#3	8-06-2008 @ 10:39:59 AM
Posted By : Adambomb	Reply \| Edit \| Del
They're one of the most overexposed classics you see everywhere like the 57 Chevies and 55-57 T-Birds, I'll still take a GT350 tho.


#4	8-06-2008 @ 02:16:50 PM
Posted By : 454Nova	Reply \| Edit \| Del
#2, I never did.


#5	8-06-2008 @ 02:20:43 PM
Posted By : Skid	Reply \| Edit \| Del
Your collective taste is in your collective ass.


#6	8-06-2008 @ 03:11:44 PM
Posted By : wannabemustangjockey	Reply \| Edit \| Del
Dibs.


#7	8-07-2008 @ 01:55:11 AM
Posted By : MxCx	Reply \| Edit \| Del
#5, Classic doesnt equal pretty.


#8	8-07-2008 @ 02:01:11 AM
Posted By : wannabemustangjockey	Reply \| Edit \| Del
I could say something mean about the attractiveness of early '90s Accords, but I won't.


#9	8-07-2008 @ 02:02:35 AM
Posted By : MxCx	Reply \| Edit \| Del
#8, You are so god damn retarded sometimes. What the flying fuck does my car have to do with anything in this thread? Go yiff yourself.


#10	8-07-2008 @ 02:06:36 AM
Posted By : wannabemustangjockey	Reply \| Edit \| Del
#9, Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, sir. I don't give a shit about your Accord any more than you like my Pontiac. I like my car, you like your car. I like the GT350, you don't. Great for us.


#11	8-07-2008 @ 02:06:58 AM
Posted By : MxCx	Reply \| Edit \| Del
#10, Must be why you brought it up. Im not delusional. Old Accords are boring looking. The only stop looking boring when they become hideously ugly. [Edited by MxCx on 8-07-2008 @ 02:07:37 AM]


#12	8-07-2008 @ 02:14:48 AM
Posted By : Driven_out	Reply \| Edit \| Del
calm down girls.


#13	8-07-2008 @ 04:08:53 AM
Posted By : Skid	Reply \| Edit \| Del
#7, No, but 1965 Mustang fastback DOES equal pretty. Differing opinions may be fine and dandy, but actually calling into question the styling of what's universally considered one of the all-time greatest-looking cars ever built? Ballsy, perhaps, but expect derision from others.


#14	8-07-2008 @ 05:40:46 AM
Posted By : MxCx	Reply \| Edit \| Del
#13, The nose is just too stubby for me. I LOVE the 69/70. Comparatively, the 65-68 just dont do it for me. I blew up at yiffy because his comment was about as logical as my ball hair designing the next space shuttle. [Edited by MxCx on 8-07-2008 @ 05:43:08 AM]

Showing page: 1 of 1
[ 1 ]

Login to leave a comment

	Classifieds
Click here to post your own classified ad

Want to send some feedback? Click here.
Server time: Wednesday, April 24, 2024 01:25:19 PM

All pictures on this site are property of their respective owners.
Copyright � 2000 - 2024 Ricecop. All rights reserved.