|
|
|
|
|
This image has expired.
Final Stats:
| Total Votes |
0 |
| Average Score |
0.00 |
| Verdict |
Good
|
|
Picture
Information
|
| URL:
http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=45974 |
|
| Comments: 24 (Read/Post) Favorites: 0 (View) |
Submitted
on: 10-29-2005
|
 View Stats |
Category:
Photoshop/Art |
|
|
Description:
Separated at birth! The Buick Lucerne and the Volkswagen Phaeton.
...perhaps the question now is: who is the father? |
Showing page: 1 of 2
[ 1 2 ]
 |
| #3 |
10-29-2005 @ 09:52:55 PM |
| Posted By : Altima35se2003 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Bob Lutz....
Lucerne is not your child.
Audience: oooooooooooooooooooooh! hoot hoot shiiiiiiiiiiit!
|
|
| #4 |
10-29-2005 @ 09:54:18 PM |
| Posted By : Subourbon187 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
As much as it pleases me to see Buick shed it's granny car image, even ever so slightly, the resemblance to the Volkswagen is uncanny. Those companies don't even have anything to do with each other.
|
|
| #5 |
10-29-2005 @ 09:55:18 PM |
| Posted By : Altima35se2003 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#4, 180hp 4 speed 3.8 = teh twincharged suck with Nawzzzz and a tailwind
[Edited by Altima35se2003 on 10-29-2005 @ 09:55:33 PM]
|
|
| #7 |
10-29-2005 @ 09:57:50 PM |
| Posted By : Altima35se2003 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#6, 180hp 4 speed integra b18c_/ 2006 civic sounds crap too. but still less crap
|
|
| #8 |
10-29-2005 @ 11:08:19 PM |
| Posted By : Obsidian |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#5, [nitpick]197hp[/nitpick]
All in all - I can only see a strong resemblance in the rear fascia (especally the tailights). The rear quarter window - however - is not as identical as you'd think. The Lucerne's quarter window curves back towards the front of the car while the Phaeton's traces a weak path to follow the C-pillar.
[Edited by Obsidian on 10-29-2005 @ 11:09:26 PM]
|
|
| #9 |
10-29-2005 @ 11:21:56 PM |
| Posted By : Lemming |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I'd say the general direction of Buick's styling has definitely become more European-influenced in recent years, at any rate.
|
|
| #10 |
10-29-2005 @ 11:26:27 PM |
| Posted By : MxCx |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Am I the only one who thinks the resemblance goes no further than the tail lights?
#6, The Honda 2.7 made that much power. Then the 3.0 made 200. Now the 3.0 makes 240. The 3.5 makes 270 or 290. Not bad for a Honda. Feh.
[Edited by MxCx on 10-29-2005 @ 11:30:43 PM]
|
|
| #11 |
10-29-2005 @ 11:27:19 PM |
| Posted By : frankie_D |
|
**NUKED**
|
|
| #13 |
10-29-2005 @ 11:58:40 PM |
| Posted By : frankie_D |
|
**NUKED**
|
|
| #14 |
10-30-2005 @ 12:02:10 AM |
| Posted By : Subourbon187 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#13, Don't contradict him! He'll derive pleasure by tearing down your self esteem! :p
|
|
| #15 |
10-30-2005 @ 12:07:05 AM |
| Posted By : frankie_D |
|
**NUKED**
|
|
| #17 |
10-30-2005 @ 12:34:54 AM |
| Posted By : MxCx |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Grumpy? No. A dick? Yes. :)
And I seem to remember the new SAE standards taking the RL down a peg to 290.
#12, just fyi, youre too new to use sarcasm with the :P We dont know you well enough to tell, yet ;)
[Edited by MxCx on 10-30-2005 @ 12:38:48 AM]
|
|
| #18 |
10-30-2005 @ 12:36:53 AM |
| Posted By : frankie_D |
|
**NUKED**
|
|
| #19 |
10-30-2005 @ 12:40:02 AM |
| Posted By : MxCx |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#18, I dont pay enough attention to Toyota to know. I think some Toyotas and Nissans actually gained a few horses after the change..
|
Showing page: 1 of 2
[ 1 2 ]
Login to leave a comment
|
|
|
|
|
