|
|
|
Go back and vote on this image.
Showing page: 1 of 2 [ 1 2 ]
|
#5 |
12-04-2005 @ 12:14:11 PM |
Posted By : Lemming |
Reply | Edit | Del |
And stylewise, anything else > new Mustang. I swear, Ford came out with this to help Chevy sell more C6s.
edit: and yes, I know they're selling well. But I think they're ugly, and I'm always right. ;)
[Edited by Lemming on 12-04-2005 @ 12:14:53 PM] |
|
#6 |
12-04-2005 @ 01:42:03 PM |
Posted By : Muntz05 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
The grill and lower grill just look too big, they need something to fill them in |
|
#7 |
12-04-2005 @ 01:42:55 PM |
Posted By : Subourbon187 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#5, What!!!1111 2005 Mustangs are teh shit! They're a helluva lot better looking than the 99-04 generation, espescially the stupid V6 ones! *runs* |
|
#8 |
12-04-2005 @ 01:57:42 PM |
Posted By : Adambomb |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#7, Needs more 'my little pony' stickers *also runs* |
|
#9 |
12-04-2005 @ 03:03:07 PM |
Posted By : thontor |
Reply | Edit | Del |
while the novelty for this lastest generation mustang has worn off for me.. i still like them, and i definately think they look better than the last generation.. this cobra is pretty sweet looking |
|
#10 |
12-04-2005 @ 05:17:00 PM |
Posted By : Lemming |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I prefer the '99-04 bodystyle because there's less blatant retro silliness. From a chassis and suspension standpoint, the new (SN197?) platform is clearly better in stock form, although they're heavier yet again.
The GT is probably the most palatable of the new Mustangs, but it still looks like they gave up on styling it when they got around to the back. The V6's bumpers and cladding look pretty bad, and I don't care for the front-end restyle on this Cobra..thing at all. |
|
#11 |
12-04-2005 @ 05:23:47 PM |
Posted By : Subourbon187 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Call me whatever you want, but I find the new GT500 a very sexy and sporty machine, it's powerful, aggressively styled and a better value than the Saleen S281-SC. And no, Shelby didn't pay me to say that either. I like it the styling fine, there's no obnoxious fog lights or chrome or bolt ons, it's very simple and effective. |
|
#12 |
12-04-2005 @ 05:25:02 PM |
Posted By : ricerocketboy |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I like the '05 alot, and I like this one here. However, I do think $55,000 is a bit rediculous for a Mustang. |
|
#13 |
12-04-2005 @ 05:27:07 PM |
Posted By : Lemming |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#11, And the front tires probably dent the pavement whereever it goes. :p
#12, Just "a bit"? Yeah, by about a factor of 2x-3x. |
|
#14 |
12-04-2005 @ 05:28:04 PM |
Posted By : ricerocketboy |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#13, Yea, I know. I couldn't belive that the new GT sticker at nearly $32-$35K. I'm aorry, but I think $25k is about tops for a Mustang. |
|
#16 |
12-04-2005 @ 05:31:19 PM |
Posted By : Lemming |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#15, It has nothing to do with that. That was a sarcastic reference to the sheer mass of the car. |
|
#20 |
12-04-2005 @ 05:34:03 PM |
Posted By : ricerocketboy |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#18, they look better porportioned than these. I am sorry, I like the '05s but they just look "heavy and bloated" to me. |
Showing page: 1 of 2 [ 1 2 ]
Login to leave a comment
|
|
|
|
|