|
|
|
|
|
Go back and vote on this image.
Showing page: 1 of 2
[ 1 2 ]
 |
| #1 |
1-08-2006 @ 03:44:36 PM |
| Posted By : thontor |
Reply | Edit | Del |
i think it looks tons better in these pictures, these are obviously renderings, and not a real car like the red one, but these pictures in this color, really show off the lines of the car better, as you all know i love the new styling on the cadillacs, and the chisled lines and sharp corners on this, remind me of that.. i love it
|
|
| #2 |
1-08-2006 @ 04:14:12 PM |
| Posted By : BoazMacPhereson |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Well the front end is ugly in silver too...hm. As for the new Cadillacs? They make me want to kill something.
|
|
| #3 |
1-08-2006 @ 06:05:22 PM |
| Posted By : Disrupture |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I freaking love this. I would have been proud if the GM factory in my hometown was still opened (they made the last Camaros/Firebirds in production) and build this car.
[Edited by Disrupture on 1-08-2006 @ 06:05:46 PM]
|
|
| #4 |
1-08-2006 @ 06:06:37 PM |
| Posted By : Lemming |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Based on the concept photos, I think it's got potential, although I'm REALLY REALLY tired of this retro-themed nonsense.
|
|
| #5 |
1-08-2006 @ 06:10:45 PM |
| Posted By : Disrupture |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#4, Meh.. retro can be good sometimes. Apart from the PT Cruiser and the HHR, all retroish concepts look great. But I don't get the real use for this car. GM already got the Corvette.
|
|
| #6 |
1-08-2006 @ 06:29:23 PM |
| Posted By : Subourbon187 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
It's probably going to compete with the Mustang GT. As far as the Retro theme goes, I'm all for it, I think it's cool to see a nod back to the era when cars didn't look like jellybeans
|
|
| #7 |
1-08-2006 @ 06:30:12 PM |
| Posted By : thontor |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#5, um, the corvette costs $45,000+.. this car will cost from $20,000-$35,000.. and it's got a back seat, unlike the corvette, you cant really compare, two completely different markets
that's like saying why should Ford build the mustang when it has the GT
or why should Dodge build the Challenger when it has the Viper
seriously that's one of the dumbest statements i've heard in a while, nothing personal
|
|
| #9 |
1-08-2006 @ 06:34:09 PM |
| Posted By : Disrupture |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#7, Oh, thanks ! What I meant was, GM already has a "cheap" RWD V8 6-spd sportscar. I'm not comparing apples with bananas like you think I am.
|
|
| #10 |
1-08-2006 @ 06:37:52 PM |
| Posted By : thontor |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#9, cheap, but still not affordable by anyone under 35-40.. the camaro is made to be affordable to those drivers under 35, and it's got a back seat! .. you were comparing apples and oranges, whether you were trying to or not..
|
|
| #11 |
1-08-2006 @ 06:40:14 PM |
| Posted By : Disrupture |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#10, I won't argue with you. You're far more superior to my knowledge, and your english is better !
|
|
| #12 |
1-08-2006 @ 06:42:22 PM |
| Posted By : Subourbon187 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
For 20-35 grand I'd buy one, but by the time these come out you'll be able to get a 2005-06 Mustang for a much more affordable price. So it'll be a toss up for the young people demographic methinks
|
|
| #13 |
1-08-2006 @ 06:45:41 PM |
| Posted By : Lemming |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Hey, since everyone's going back to the first generation, does this mean that the first restyle of this is going to make it look like the fugly 2nd-gen Camaro, and the Mustang is going to start looking like something from, say, 1971-73*? :p
*hmm, actually, maybe that wouldn't be so bad. :D
|
|
| #14 |
1-08-2006 @ 06:45:45 PM |
| Posted By : thontor |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#12, of course you'll be able to get a used Mustang for cheaper than a new Camaro.. thats the way cars work.. the Camaro will be priced to compete with the Mustangs of it's day.. who knows what Mustangs will be like in 2 or 3 years, they are supposedly undergoing a redesign
|
|
| #15 |
1-08-2006 @ 06:49:09 PM |
| Posted By : Subourbon187 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#14, I know, I'm just saying that why buy a 25 grand Camaro when you can buy a Mustang GT that's only a few years older and has almost as much performance for a lot cheaper. I know I'm stating the obvious, but a poor man like me has to think from a poor man's perspective
|
|
| #16 |
1-08-2006 @ 06:51:21 PM |
| Posted By : thontor |
Reply | Edit | Del |
almost the same performance? since when do you call 3/4 the horsepower, almost the same performance
|
|
| #17 |
1-08-2006 @ 06:53:40 PM |
| Posted By : Subourbon187 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Okay 100 hp difference BFD, but Ford does sell a GT66 package that sports 375 horsepower and a 5 speed performance automatic for a few grand more than the GT.
|
|
| #18 |
1-08-2006 @ 06:54:46 PM |
| Posted By : Lemming |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I don't think it's reasonable to even make comparisons until the new Challenger and this thing both hit the market. *shrug*
|
|
| #19 |
1-08-2006 @ 06:55:14 PM |
| Posted By : thontor |
Reply | Edit | Del |
and thus canceling out your savings by getting a 2-3 year old car.. 100hp is a lot.. do you think my V6 camaro has almost the same performance as a 4th gen Z28 or mustang GT? hah.. i don't.. it has 100 less horsepower BFD
|
|
| #20 |
1-08-2006 @ 06:55:28 PM |
| Posted By : Subourbon187 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
What I'm saying is that why would you pay 7-10 grand more for only 100 more horsepower when you can just put some performance parts in your 2-3 year old Mustang GT engine and get it up to 400 hp for a fraction of the price
[Edited by Subourbon187 on 1-08-2006 @ 06:58:17 PM]
|
Showing page: 1 of 2
[ 1 2 ]
Login to leave a comment
|
|
|
|
|
View Stats