Go to car


Latest Comments
Car: 37161   By: DiRF   Comment: "As a piggyback on that... still on my vacation in ..."
Car: 37161   By: DiRF   Comment: "So, apparently, Kranefuss wasn't the *only* team o..."
Car: 78637   By: DiRF   Comment: "Welp, Renault-Samsung Motors doesn't exist as a br..."
Car: Fpost   By: DiRF   Comment: "Just got in today. Will hit the Hall of Fame tomor..."
Car: Fpost   By: ricerocketboy   Comment: "sweet :D I have never done that. :) Hows is it?..."
See last 25 comments
 Go to

Next picture
Ricecop Home
Linkage
Plates
Bling Bling
Photo
Free Post

 Top 10

Top 10 Ricers
Top 10 Non-Ricers
Top 10 Other Good
Top 10 Other Bad

 New & Retired

Newest Images
Retired Images

 Other

Submit a picture
Profile Lookup
FAQ
Site Log
Leader Board
Site Stats

 Online Now

1 Ricecops
1 Guests

Detailed List

 Login

Username:

Password:


Remember Login?

Sign up!
Why sign up?
Forgot my password


View this image at full size
Click here to let us know if the image above is broken.


Go back and vote on this image.

Picture Information
URL: http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=50117
Submitted by: Lemming
Comments: 26  (Read/Post)     Favorites: 1  (View)
Submitted on: 02-26-2006
View Stats Category: Photoshop/Art
Description:
Mustang Mach 1


   Comments

Showing page: 1 of 2
[
1 2 ]

#1
2-27-2006 @ 02:39:48 AM
Posted By : Subourbon187 Reply | Edit | Del
I <3 cell shading

#2
2-27-2006 @ 10:28:03 AM
Posted By : stang392 Reply | Edit | Del
now thats just awesome

#3
2-27-2006 @ 01:51:39 PM
Posted By : Adambomb Reply | Edit | Del
Looked real in the thumbnail.

#4
2-27-2006 @ 02:40:18 PM
Posted By : DA_MAISTA Reply | Edit | Del
May I misuse this marvellous piece of work to have my euro-ass educated on Mustangs?
Cobra Jet
Cobra
Boss
Mach 1
Which one is the fastest? And, if time permits, what are the general characteristics of each strain?


#5
2-27-2006 @ 03:09:08 PM
Posted By : Subourbon187 Reply | Edit | Del
#4, I'm going to assume you want the first model year of production for each type of Mustang:

1968 Cobra Jet: 428 cid; 335 bhp @ 5600 rpm, 445 ft-lbs torque @ 3400 rpm; 14.254 sec 1/4 mile

1999 SVT Cobra: 4.6L displacement; 320 bhp @ 6000 rpms, 314 ft-lbs torque @ 4750 rpms; 13.4 sec 1/4 mile

1969 Boss 302: 302 cid; 290 bhp @ 5800 rpms, 290 ft-lbs torque @ 4300 rpms; 14.6 sec 1/4 mile

1969 Mach 1: 351 cid dispacement; 335 bhp @ 5200 rpms, 440 ft-lbs torque @ 3400 rpms; 13.9 sec 1/4 mile

[Edited by Subourbon187 on 2-27-2006 @ 03:10:04 PM]


#6
2-27-2006 @ 03:15:46 PM
Posted By : stang392 Reply | Edit | Del
#4, Cobra Jet was more like a trim level. any FoMoCo car with a 428/429CJ engine was known as a Cobra Jet

Cobra (just sticking with FoMoCo) started out as not much more then a sticker package, it wasn't untill SVT started making them in 93 that they became a higher performing version. since then the Cobra has always been the halo car of the model line, any given year the Cobra will be the best performing stang

Boss was used back in the late 60s to make the 302 Mustang legal for Trans Am and to make the 429 "hemi" legal for Nascar. then Boss name was around for 3 years 69-71 (however the 429 Boss stopped in 70) but IIRC the 71 351 Boss was just a trim package (it still had a better version of the 351, but I don't think it was to make the car legal for racing)

Mach 1 has always been the midway point between the GT and the current halo stang


#7
2-27-2006 @ 03:25:55 PM
Posted By : stang392 Reply | Edit | Del
#6, also while the Boss name has been used since, it was in more a tuner sense more along the lines of Saleen and Roush, I don't Believe Ford had anything to do it. the was also the kick ass Boss concept with the 10 liter big block under the hood

#8
2-27-2006 @ 03:28:16 PM
Posted By : BoazMacPhereson Reply | Edit | Del
#7, I know Shinoda made a "Boss" sometime on the 94-98 gen 'Stangs.

#9
2-27-2006 @ 03:37:23 PM
Posted By : Subourbon187 Reply | Edit | Del
#8, Yeah, they were basically trim packages for the last iteration of the 5.0L Ford engine, designed by Larry Shinoda and team Shinoda.

#10
2-27-2006 @ 04:35:07 PM
Posted By : Muntz05 Reply | Edit | Del
Damn that's beautiful, Lem

#11
2-27-2006 @ 04:35:42 PM
Posted By : ricerocketboy Reply | Edit | Del
:) Nice work again.

#12
2-28-2006 @ 04:33:34 PM
Posted By : wannabemustangjockey  Reply | Edit | Del
Anyone else notice that the door handle is missing?

#13
2-28-2006 @ 09:07:37 PM
Posted By : DA_MAISTA Reply | Edit | Del
Thanks to all of you, you knowledge is very much appreciated-

#14
3-03-2006 @ 05:41:28 PM
Posted By : Lemming Reply | Edit | Del
#12, Congratulations. Perhaps, by now, you've noticed that I usually delete trim and accessories unless they actually are an integral part of the car's styling. :p

#15
3-03-2006 @ 05:43:38 PM
Posted By : solid_snake Reply | Edit | Del
#12, you forgot to mention the antenna, or lack there of.

[Edited by solid_snake on 3-03-2006 @ 05:44:52 PM]


#16
3-03-2006 @ 05:44:18 PM
Posted By : Lemming Reply | Edit | Del
Don't forget the wiper arms.

#17
3-03-2006 @ 05:45:46 PM
Posted By : solid_snake Reply | Edit | Del
word.

Not so observent NOW are you bitch?

it should be mentioned that bitch is an awesome word


#18
3-03-2006 @ 05:46:20 PM
Posted By : Lemming Reply | Edit | Del
It's incredibly versatile, sort of like the one that begins with the letter F.

#19
3-03-2006 @ 05:47:38 PM
Posted By : 427 Vette Reply | Edit | Del
Ford?

:P


#20
3-03-2006 @ 05:48:05 PM
Posted By : Lemming Reply | Edit | Del
#19, Yeah, that one! It's such a strong form of profanity when used properly!

Showing page: 1 of 2
[
1 2 ]


Login to leave a comment

Classifieds 
Click here to post your own classified ad






Want to send some feedback? Click here.

Server time: Wednesday, April 24, 2024 08:31:41 AM

All pictures on this site are property of their respective owners.
Copyright © 2000 - 2024 Ricecop. All rights reserved.