Go to car


Latest Comments
Car: 37161   By: DiRF   Comment: "As a piggyback on that... still on my vacation in ..."
Car: 37161   By: DiRF   Comment: "So, apparently, Kranefuss wasn't the *only* team o..."
Car: 78637   By: DiRF   Comment: "Welp, Renault-Samsung Motors doesn't exist as a br..."
Car: Fpost   By: DiRF   Comment: "Just got in today. Will hit the Hall of Fame tomor..."
Car: Fpost   By: ricerocketboy   Comment: "sweet :D I have never done that. :) Hows is it?..."
See last 25 comments
 Go to

Next picture
Ricecop Home
Linkage
Plates
Bling Bling
Photo
Free Post

 Top 10

Top 10 Ricers
Top 10 Non-Ricers
Top 10 Other Good
Top 10 Other Bad

 New & Retired

Newest Images
Retired Images

 Other

Submit a picture
Profile Lookup
FAQ
Site Log
Leader Board
Site Stats

 Online Now

0 Ricecops
1 Guests

Detailed List

 Login

Username:

Password:


Remember Login?

Sign up!
Why sign up?
Forgot my password


View this image at full size
Click here to let us know if the image above is broken.


Go back and vote on this image.

Picture Information
URL: http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=52800
Submitted by: thontor
Comments: 19  (Read/Post)     Favorites: 1  (View)
Submitted on: 05-23-2006
View Stats Category: Vehicle Group
Description:
sheesh, and i thought the Camaro Concept was bigger than it's likeness..

this Dodge Challenger is friggen huge!

http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/d...rticleId=115459#36


   Comments

Showing page: 1 of 1
[
1 ]

#1
5-23-2006 @ 04:36:48 PM
Posted By : MxCx Reply | Edit | Del
The original looks longer, the new just looks taller.

#2
5-23-2006 @ 04:43:17 PM
Posted By : Tastycakemix Reply | Edit | Del
I just cant get myself to like the concept car.

#3
5-23-2006 @ 04:50:19 PM
Posted By : 89Rettagt Reply | Edit | Del
cars in general are too tall. its the SUV mentality. higher does not equal better.

#4
5-23-2006 @ 05:03:15 PM
Posted By : Bmarc Reply | Edit | Del
Looks like its gained some weight after all that time off.

#5
5-23-2006 @ 05:05:36 PM
Posted By : Disrupture Reply | Edit | Del
I don't like the wheels and it's too tall.

#6
5-23-2006 @ 05:40:17 PM
Posted By : solid_snake Reply | Edit | Del
fat like the whale

#7
5-23-2006 @ 08:04:21 PM
Posted By : ImRaptor Reply | Edit | Del
When looking at them side by side, the concept kind of looks like it has Down syndrome.

#8
5-23-2006 @ 09:26:23 PM
Posted By : BoazMacPhereson Reply | Edit | Del
I still love the concept and I hope that they produce it. I do find it humerous how different the wheels are. Look at the size of the new ones(20s) compared to the old (probably 15s)

#9
5-23-2006 @ 11:37:03 PM
Posted By : Subourbon187 Reply | Edit | Del
The more I look at the concept, the more it looks too damn big, I still like it alot though. But all these new retro stylings are like the lard ass dopplegangers of the original nameplates

#10
5-23-2006 @ 11:41:07 PM
Posted By : DiRF  Reply | Edit | Del
*insert rant about all new cars being bloated pigs because carmakers are lazy sumbitches that think the only way to make a car better is to make it bigger and with more weighty luxuries*

*include siderant about how there is only ONE fucking car currently on the market LIGHTER than my compact (not even subcompact) car, and that car being the Lotus Elise, whose makers I applaud... the Honda Insight is also lighter, but that car's production is being cancelled*

*...and for spice, a rant about the SUV-ication of cars, making them taller and more slabsided, which makes them look horribly un-sleek, and since wheels look smaller on tall cars, automakers continually have to put larger and larger rims on cars to counteract the horrid tall bodies*


#11
5-23-2006 @ 11:53:05 PM
Posted By : thontor Reply | Edit | Del
#1,
the new one is bigger in every dimension, including length

cars are getting bigger because of safety requirements.. not much can be done about that..



#12
5-23-2006 @ 11:55:22 PM
Posted By : Subourbon187 Reply | Edit | Del
At least it's not a 4 door

#13
5-23-2006 @ 11:55:40 PM
Posted By : Lemming Reply | Edit | Del
Cars are getting lamer looking because of designer unoriginality. Shame nobody wants to do anything about that.

#14
5-23-2006 @ 11:56:18 PM
Posted By : Subourbon187 Reply | Edit | Del
#13, We could always burn down the big 3 :p

#15
5-23-2006 @ 11:57:18 PM
Posted By : Lemming Reply | Edit | Del
Ford and GM are doing a fine job of ruining themselves. Just give it time.

#16
5-24-2006 @ 12:00:16 AM
Posted By : DiRF  Reply | Edit | Del
Can Chrysler still be considered one of the Big 3?

I mean... with their "friendly merger" with Mercedes meaning Chrysler's entire executive board was axed and replaced with Mercedes executives...


#17
5-24-2006 @ 12:03:41 AM
Posted By : Altima35se2003 Reply | Edit | Del
#16, and isn't toyota bigger too?

#18
5-24-2006 @ 12:17:51 AM
Posted By : Subourbon187 Reply | Edit | Del
#16, Dieter Zietscht (butchered his name probably) has been trying to distance himself from GM and Ford for quite some time, I think he's pretty much accomplished that

#19
5-24-2006 @ 12:51:35 AM
Posted By : PurpleTriangle04 Reply | Edit | Del
#16, I haven't considered Chrysler amongst the "big 3" since the days of the K-cars... (mutters something about mitsubishi)

Showing page: 1 of 1
[
1 ]


Login to leave a comment

Classifieds 
Click here to post your own classified ad






Want to send some feedback? Click here.

Server time: Thursday, April 25, 2024 06:15:31 PM

All pictures on this site are property of their respective owners.
Copyright © 2000 - 2024 Ricecop. All rights reserved.