|
|
|
Go back and vote on this image.
Showing page: 1 of 2 [ 1 2 ]
|
#4 |
9-28-2006 @ 12:07:52 AM |
Posted By : ricerocketboy |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#3, gack. I thought it was an ML. :( Am I the only one who thinks the new Escalade looks absolutely horrid in red, and that the new Navigator looks downright wierd? |
|
#5 |
9-28-2006 @ 02:57:23 PM |
Posted By : Bling24 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I like the new 'lade, though I miss the old LOOKATMENIGGA front end |
|
#7 |
9-28-2006 @ 05:42:08 PM |
Posted By : ricerocketboy |
Reply | Edit | Del |
gimme an old K5 Blazer, a 2 dr Tahoe, an '80s Bronco, or a Ramcharger and I'm set. |
|
#9 |
9-28-2006 @ 05:46:12 PM |
Posted By : Adambomb |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#7, Same, and add Jeep CJ (No pussy Wranglers :P) and FJ40, IH Scout and Land Rover Defender to my list as well. |
|
#11 |
9-28-2006 @ 05:47:35 PM |
Posted By : stang392 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
"Jeep CJ (No pussy Wranglers :P)" amen to that :-)
[Edited by stang392 on 9-28-2006 @ 05:47:53 PM] |
|
#13 |
9-28-2006 @ 05:48:05 PM |
Posted By : Subourbon187 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I don't give much of a toot for SUV's or ORV's built after 1979
[Edited by Subourbon187 on 9-28-2006 @ 05:50:34 PM] |
|
#15 |
9-28-2006 @ 05:49:25 PM |
Posted By : stang392 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#10, Broncos, K5s, and CJs are not SUVs, they were built to go offroad, not to the soccer field |
|
#16 |
9-28-2006 @ 05:49:26 PM |
Posted By : Sensekhmet |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#12, Hmmm... what? Sport(s) Utility Vehicle: an off-road wannabe. How can you put the Defender in the same class? |
|
#17 |
9-28-2006 @ 05:49:43 PM |
Posted By : Adambomb |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#13, Yeah I've noticed that (for the most part) Suv's introduced since the 80s have sucked balls. (other than redesigned versions of older ones, but even some of those have been pussified) |
Showing page: 1 of 2 [ 1 2 ]
Login to leave a comment
|
|
|
|
|