|
|
|
|
|
This image has expired.
Final Stats:
| Total Votes |
0 |
| Average Score |
0.00 |
| Verdict |
Good
|
Showing page: 1 of 2
[ 1 2 ]
 |
| #3 |
11-30-2006 @ 01:42:37 PM |
| Posted By : MxCx |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Wow. This actually makes the car look good.
|
|
| #4 |
11-30-2006 @ 01:46:03 PM |
| Posted By : thirtyseven |
Reply | Edit | Del |
these cars are crap, IMO, but boy I'd love to get my hands on one of those Yamaha V8s... that would make a perfect swap motor for an AW11.
edit: oh yeah, and this does look great with those wheels.
[Edited by thirtyseven on 11-30-2006 @ 01:46:21 PM]
|
|
| #7 |
11-30-2006 @ 01:49:11 PM |
| Posted By : BoazMacPhereson |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#4, Reverse that statement. SHOs are badass on many levels. However, this gen, with the V8, is crap, as are the V8s. They tended to eat themselves.
|
|
| #8 |
11-30-2006 @ 01:50:08 PM |
| Posted By : thirtyseven |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I love first gen SHOs, just the second gen from what I've read aren't very nice. There were problems with these motors?
|
|
| #9 |
11-30-2006 @ 01:51:10 PM |
| Posted By : Disrupture |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#7, Yes I heard the V8 sucked. I personally prefer the V6 anyway.
|
|
| #10 |
11-30-2006 @ 01:51:13 PM |
| Posted By : thirtyseven |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#6, doesn't it? It would all go together what with the 4AGE being pretty much a Yamaha motor anyway.
|
|
| #11 |
11-30-2006 @ 01:52:22 PM |
| Posted By : thirtyseven |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#9, I know the V6 would rev to 8500 RPM if it weren't for the accessory drive system not designed to withstand it, I imagine there is a fix.... how did the V8s rev?
|
|
| #12 |
11-30-2006 @ 02:04:56 PM |
| Posted By : Adambomb |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I saw a nice red 1.5 gen (92-95) the other day near the park.
|
|
| #13 |
11-30-2006 @ 02:06:23 PM |
| Posted By : ricerocketboy |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I want one of those in either pine green, or black, or a custom painted gunmetal one.
|
|
| #14 |
11-30-2006 @ 02:15:37 PM |
| Posted By : BoazMacPhereson |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#8, Yeah, from what I've heard, the V8s were just notorious for being crap. That and the 3rd gen were AUTO ONLY. Screw that. Gimme a 93 with a 5-speed.
|
|
| #15 |
11-30-2006 @ 02:16:19 PM |
| Posted By : ricerocketboy |
Reply | Edit | Del |
so, is the gen 3 SHO, a mid 90s Buick Lucerne? :p
[Edited by ricerocketboy on 11-30-2006 @ 02:16:40 PM]
|
|
| #17 |
11-30-2006 @ 02:24:09 PM |
| Posted By : Subourbon187 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#15, No, this is the 3rd gen SHO. A SHO variation was built for each generation of the Taurus until the 2000 redesign. And this was the only SHO gen that had a V8 IIRC
[Edited by Subourbon187 on 11-30-2006 @ 02:25:37 PM]
|
|
| #18 |
11-30-2006 @ 09:30:04 PM |
| Posted By : Muntz05 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I know a guy that had one. Ran the hell out of it
|
|
| #20 |
12-20-2006 @ 11:53:06 PM |
| Posted By : three50one |
Reply | Edit | Del |
a stock v8 sho starts to redline at 7K ....mine shifts at 7.5K when on it hard but feels like it should go more
|
Showing page: 1 of 2
[ 1 2 ]
Login to leave a comment
|
|
|
|
|
View Stats