|
|
|
|
|
This image has expired.
Final Stats:
| Total Votes |
289 |
| Average Score |
3.44 |
| Verdict |
Not Rice
|
|
Picture
Information
|
| URL:
http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=5800 |
|
| Comments: 22 (Read/Post) Favorites: 1 (View) |
Submitted
on: 05-17-2002
|
 View Stats |
Category:
Car |
|
|
Description:
Good god this thing is bad. Its a KOENIG COMPETITION EVOLUTION , never seen one
before, check out these stats: Engine V12 180° 48val , hp=1,000, 740 ft. pounds, 0-60
in 3.5 and a top speed of 230mph. now i've never heard nor seen anything like this, i
kinda like it |
Showing page: 1 of 2
[ 1 2 ]
 |
| #1 |
6-02-2002 @ 06:27:21 AM |
| Posted By : cams116 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I do hope you mean good bad not crap bad.
|
|
| #3 |
6-20-2002 @ 10:35:28 PM |
| Posted By : CRXtrackguy |
Reply | Edit | Del |
cool, but at 180 degrees opposed, reliability's gonna be a bitch.
|
|
| #4 |
6-24-2002 @ 10:49:18 AM |
| Posted By : AtEase |
Reply | Edit | Del |
So its a boxer V12? Strange. Is it a heavily modified F40? Looks a lot like one.
|
|
| #5 |
6-24-2002 @ 10:51:11 AM |
| Posted By : Mr Hawk |
Reply | Edit | Del |
It's not a Boxer as far as I know, got this car in an old magasine somewhere.
|
|
| #6 |
6-24-2002 @ 10:51:51 AM |
| Posted By : cams116 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Maybe the ment 80degrees. I hope so. Because a boxer V12 is not gona work.
|
|
| #8 |
6-24-2002 @ 10:53:18 AM |
| Posted By : Mr Hawk |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Boxster has nothing to do with anything here...
|
|
| #9 |
6-24-2002 @ 10:53:47 AM |
| Posted By : cams116 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
180degrees being a straigt line. Boxer being a flat engine.
[Edited by cams116 on 6-24-2002 @ 10:57:26 AM]
|
|
| #10 |
6-24-2002 @ 10:53:54 AM |
| Posted By : Lemming |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I hate to sound stupid, but why would a boxer 12 be impossible or unreliable? Porsche has been building boxer 4's and 6's for years; what problems would be inherent in doubling that?
|
|
| #11 |
6-24-2002 @ 10:53:58 AM |
| Posted By : AtEase |
Reply | Edit | Del |
V12s are usually 60degrees, never heard of 80 before. It could be of course.
|
|
| #12 |
6-24-2002 @ 10:55:02 AM |
| Posted By : Mr Hawk |
Reply | Edit | Del |
-->#9 Boxster is a Porsche, boxer is a engine type.
[Edited by Mr Hawk on 6-24-2002 @ 10:55:28 AM]
|
|
| #13 |
6-24-2002 @ 10:55:17 AM |
| Posted By : AtEase |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#10>> a boxer 12 is very possible, a boxer V12 is not.
|
|
| #14 |
6-24-2002 @ 10:55:39 AM |
| Posted By : cams116 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
More logical than a 180 one. I was just looking for a possible typo. As I dont think someone would type 180 insead of 60.
|
|
| #16 |
6-24-2002 @ 10:57:04 AM |
| Posted By : cams116 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#12 I said neither boxster or boxer. I for some reason due to flying hippos hit the letter t there. I shall now fit it up.
|
|
| #17 |
6-24-2002 @ 10:57:10 AM |
| Posted By : Mr Hawk |
Reply | Edit | Del |
--->#15 that's the way it sould be, the other way around would be scary..
|
|
| #18 |
7-06-2002 @ 06:24:02 PM |
| Posted By : CRXtrackguy |
Reply | Edit | Del |
180 degree V engine would mean massive crankshaft rigidity problems, and for reference 180 degree Vs are different than horizontally opposed or "boxer" motors. strange but true.
|
|
| #19 |
7-06-2002 @ 06:40:53 PM |
| Posted By : Lemming |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Would a 180 deg. V have 180 degrees of separation between each "hump" on the crank? I could imagine something like THAT would try to blow itself apart. What would a 180 degree V look like that would differentiate it from a boxer? I'm not trying to put anyone on the spot, but I'm really curious.
|
|
| #20 |
7-06-2002 @ 07:36:16 PM |
| Posted By : CRXtrackguy |
Reply | Edit | Del |
a boxer is like a 180 degree V turned inside out. a boxer 4 has only 2 cylinders, but 4 pistons, which compress inward towards each other. a 180 degree V is like a regular V, just flat.
|
Showing page: 1 of 2
[ 1 2 ]
Login to leave a comment
|
|
|
|
|
