Go to car


Latest Comments
Car: 95884   By: Skid   Comment: "Someone released Mulholland Drive as a track....11..."
Car: 98674   By: Skid   Comment: "Given the very low point Trans Ams performance was..."
Car: 98675   By: Skid   Comment: "I'm forever on the hunt for the XK140 dropheads th..."
Car: 98673   By: Skid   Comment: "Now THAT is a cool find. I love the British Fords..."
Car: 43287   By: Skid   Comment: "Whoo boy, there's a memory......"
See last 25 comments
 Go to

Next picture
Ricecop Home
Linkage
Plates
Bling Bling
Photo
Free Post

 Top 10

Top 10 Ricers
Top 10 Non-Ricers
Top 10 Other Good
Top 10 Other Bad

 New & Retired

Newest Images
Retired Images

 Other

Submit a picture
Profile Lookup
FAQ
Site Log
Leader Board
Site Stats

 Online Now

1 Ricecops
1 Guests

Detailed List

 Login

Username:

Password:


Remember Login?

Sign up!
Why sign up?
Forgot my password


View this image at full size
Click here to let us know if the image above is broken.


Go back and vote on this image.

Picture Information
URL: http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=59199
Submitted by: 427 Vette
Comments: 14  (Read/Post)     Favorites: 0  (View)
Submitted on: 01-04-2007
View Stats Category: Vehicle Group
Description:
Opel GTs

http://photo.ricecop.com/pics/opalsd.jpg
http://photo.ricecop.com/pics/opalsr.jpg


   Comments

Showing page: 1 of 1
[
1 ]

#1
1-04-2007 @ 11:39:09 PM
Posted By : Subourbon187 Reply | Edit | Del
Always sexy

#2
1-05-2007 @ 12:02:34 AM
Posted By : DiRF  Reply | Edit | Del
Just flat-out awesome... (heh, you'd have to keep the older GT flat-out just to keep up with traffic :P)

#3
1-05-2007 @ 12:27:22 AM
Posted By : Skid Reply | Edit | Del
#2, I'd drop in a mild Chevy 4.3 V6. Problem solved.

#4
1-05-2007 @ 02:33:21 AM
Posted By : 89Rettagt Reply | Edit | Del
#2, now that you have a car with more than 100hp at the crank you can talk shit eh? :-P

#5
1-05-2007 @ 02:53:05 AM
Posted By : Driven_out Reply | Edit | Del
#3, hell a stock 4.3 would be PLENTY for that small car.

#6
1-05-2007 @ 04:13:03 AM
Posted By : Sensekhmet Reply | Edit | Del
#3, No. It would need truck springs to support the weight and the handling would be ruined. A nice Alfa 2.5l V6 or 1.8 turbo would do the job. Or something from Cosworth.

#7
1-05-2007 @ 01:09:34 PM
Posted By : thirtyseven Reply | Edit | Del
What are the specs on the Opel Speedster? Based on reviews of the US model Sky I can only imagine it must be pretty heavily modded to suit European tastes.

#8
1-05-2007 @ 08:18:16 PM
Posted By : Obsidian Reply | Edit | Del
#7, From what I can tell - they're just redline Sky in an Opel suit. Nothing else.

[Edited by Obsidian on 1-05-2007 @ 08:18:30 PM]


#9
1-11-2007 @ 02:34:01 PM
Posted By : Skid Reply | Edit | Del
#6, Is that supposed to be a joke? A 4.3 V6 weighs less than a Chevy small block V8 (in fact, it literally IS a Chevy small block with two cylinders lopped off) and those have been successfully swapped into all manner of cars without ruining the weight.

One of the biggest myths about V8 engines to those that are unfamiliar with them seems to be that they all weigh 800 lbs.

[Edited by Skid on 1-11-2007 @ 02:34:40 PM]


#10
1-11-2007 @ 02:38:42 PM
Posted By : Subourbon187 Reply | Edit | Del
#9, Yeah, look at all the LS1 RX7s, it's an aluminum small block, not a goddamned anvil and everyones all like "OMGweightruinzhandling!!!!111". Personally the idea of a 300hp Mazda coupe gives me goosebumps.

#11
1-11-2007 @ 02:43:09 PM
Posted By : Skid Reply | Edit | Del
Generally V8-powered conversion cars only weigh 100-200 lbs more. That's no different from carrying a passenger.

Sometimes, as with the old Datsun Zs, the V8s are actually lighter.


#12
1-11-2007 @ 02:47:15 PM
Posted By : thirtyseven Reply | Edit | Del
#11, Carrying a passenger right over the steered wheels.

That said, I'd be willing to trade a little turn-in and perhaps a smidge more understeer for an LS1 powered FD.


#13
1-11-2007 @ 02:49:51 PM
Posted By : Skid Reply | Edit | Del
#12, Not exactly difficult to compensate for. I doubt it would be noticable at all, unless the car in question has an overall weight of less than 1500 lbs.

#14
1-11-2007 @ 02:53:40 PM
Posted By : thirtyseven Reply | Edit | Del
#13, Weight over the front is always noticeable, even if compensated for with suspension set-up... but as I said, a few percent loss in turn-in and a smidge of understeer could easily be compensated for with more power and torque for adjusting the attitude of the chassis with your right foot.

Showing page: 1 of 1
[
1 ]


Login to leave a comment

Classifieds 
Click here to post your own classified ad






Want to send some feedback? Click here.

Server time: Thursday, April 18, 2024 09:54:57 PM

All pictures on this site are property of their respective owners.
Copyright © 2000 - 2024 Ricecop. All rights reserved.