|
|
|
|
|
Go back and vote on this image.
|
Picture
Information
|
| URL:
http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=59627 |
|
| Comments: 73 (Read/Post) Favorites: 0 (View) |
Submitted
on: 01-17-2007
|
 View Stats |
Category:
Car |
|
|
Description:
GP STE. |
Showing page: 1 of 4
[ 1 2 3 4 ]
 |
| #2 |
1-17-2007 @ 02:47:29 PM |
| Posted By : ricerocketboy |
Reply | Edit | Del |
STE. TGP was 2 door only. 1989 STE has the 3.1Turbo V6 that is in the TGP. This is essentially a 4 door McLaren, except rarer and much harder to find in MN.$1000 firm. If the truck sells soon, this may be a candidate for a new car.
[Edited by ricerocketboy on 1-17-2007 @ 02:48:24 PM]
|
|
| #4 |
1-17-2007 @ 02:51:03 PM |
| Posted By : Disrupture |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#2, It looks really clean, for what we can see. What was the output for that engine ?
|
|
| #7 |
1-17-2007 @ 02:56:04 PM |
| Posted By : Driven_out |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Engine Description 3.1L 60 degree V6 Turbocharged Gen II V6 Engine
Horsepower 205@5200
Torque (ft-lbs) 225@2100
Top Speed 128 mph
Max Engine Speed 5500 rpm
Block Cast Iron
Heads Aluminum
Valves 12
Displacement 3.1L (3100cc, 192ci)
Cylinders 6, V formation, opposed 60 degrees
Bore 89mm (3.503")
Stroke 84mm (3.3122")
Compression Ratio 8.8:1
Fuel Management MPFI (Multi Port Fuel Injection). Electronic, controlled by ECM
Fuel Premium unleaded, 91 pump oct.
VIN code V
Usage 1989-90 Grand Prix Turbo, 90 STE Turbo
Type Gen II - Same motor as 2.8L with an increased stroke
Its not very powerful
a modern GEN III 3400 V6 from a pontiac montana/grand am puts just a lil more i believe
|
|
| #8 |
1-17-2007 @ 02:56:41 PM |
| Posted By : ricerocketboy |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#5, yes. GTP was a new for 1992, and was not supercharged at first. It had a regular 3.1 and later a 3.4. The '97+ got a supercharged 3800 Series II aka L67. The STEs have a marginal 180hp/205 ft lbs, while the STE Turbos have 205 hp/220 ft lbs.
|
|
| #9 |
1-17-2007 @ 02:57:45 PM |
| Posted By : ricerocketboy |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#7, yes it does. But the 3400 has random LIM gasket probs, whereas the 3.1 doesn't tend to unless you beat on it.
|
|
| #10 |
1-17-2007 @ 02:59:39 PM |
| Posted By : Driven_out |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#8, Fore stock 3.1L comparison reference.
Engine Description (LHO) 3.1L 60 degree V6 Gen II V6 Engine
Horsepower 140@4800 - 140@4200
Torque (ft-lbs) 180@3600 - 185@3200
Block Cast Iron
Heads Aluminum
Valves 12
Displacement 3.1L (3100cc, 192ci)
Cylinders 6, V formation, opposed 60 degrees
Bore 89mm (3.503")
Stroke 84mm (3.3122")
Compression Ratio 8.9:1
Fuel Management MPFI (Multi Port Fuel Injection). Electronic, controlled by ECM
VIN code T
Type Gen II - Same motor as 2.8L with an increased stroke
|
|
| #14 |
1-17-2007 @ 03:02:08 PM |
| Posted By : Driven_out |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#11, I wouldnt know how durable these would be to more boost... they were already pretty shitty for durability stock, dont wanna know what happens if you force a good amount of boost into it
|
|
| #18 |
1-17-2007 @ 03:03:22 PM |
| Posted By : Driven_out |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#12, get a cavalier and this STE, and swap that engine into the far lighter cav
|
|
| #20 |
1-17-2007 @ 03:04:30 PM |
| Posted By : ricerocketboy |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#18, hmmmm. L67 Cavalier maybe. I have thought about a L67 Cavvy before. Sounds quite fun. I also would like the idea of putting an L67 into a GPSE 4 dr without the GT aero package.
#19, it's been done before. Too bad the only examples I've seen in person are riced. :(
[Edited by ricerocketboy on 1-17-2007 @ 03:05:12 PM]
|
Showing page: 1 of 4
[ 1 2 3 4 ]
Login to leave a comment
|
|
|
|
|
