Ricecop's Rice Or Not?

Latest Comments

Car: 37161	By: DiRF	Comment: "As a piggyback on that... still on my vacation in ..."
Car: 37161	By: DiRF	Comment: "So, apparently, Kranefuss wasn't the only team o..."
Car: 78637	By: DiRF	Comment: "Welp, Renault-Samsung Motors doesn't exist as a br..."
Car: Fpost	By: DiRF	Comment: "Just got in today. Will hit the Hall of Fame tomor..."
Car: Fpost	By: ricerocketboy	Comment: "sweet :D I have never done that. :) Hows is it?..."

See last 25 comments

Go to
Next picture Ricecop Home Linkage Plates Bling Bling Photo Free Post

Top 10
Top 10 Ricers Top 10 Non-Ricers Top 10 Other Good Top 10 Other Bad

New & Retired
Newest Images Retired Images

Other
Submit a picture Profile Lookup FAQ Site Log Leader Board Site Stats

Online Now
0 Ricecops 1 Guests Detailed List

This image has expired.

Final Stats:

Total Votes	14
Average Score	1.79
Verdict	Not Rice

Picture Information
URL: http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=60000	Submitted by: wannabemustangjockey
Comments: 20 (Read/Post) Favorites: 0 (View)	Submitted on: 01-26-2007
View Stats	Category: Car
Photoshops of this image: 60001,
Description: In the darkness, the 6K lurks...

Showing page: 1 of 1
[ 1 ]


#1	1-26-2007 @ 12:49:22 AM
Posted By : wannabemustangjockey	Reply \| Edit \| Del
Annnnnnd .... 60K is the 6K!


#2	1-26-2007 @ 12:49:45 AM
Posted By : ricerocketboy	Reply \| Edit \| Del
cool pic.


#3	1-26-2007 @ 12:50:17 AM
Posted By : Driven_out	Reply \| Edit \| Del
Kick ass.


#4	1-26-2007 @ 12:53:04 AM
Posted By : Subourbon187	Reply \| Edit \| Del
Righteous duder! I nailed the 45K post when I was but a newbie, I hope you experience the same joy [Edited by Subourbon187 on 1-26-2007 @ 12:54:55 AM]


#5	1-26-2007 @ 12:53:30 AM
Posted By : Altima35se2003	Reply \| Edit \| Del
great.....now we really can't get rid of him......ood .I mean confurgulations! :p Good work on nailing the 60kth post G


#6	1-26-2007 @ 01:00:28 AM
Posted By : Skid	Reply \| Edit \| Del
I got pic #25000. I'm still proud.


#7	1-26-2007 @ 01:00:59 AM
Posted By : Subourbon187	Reply \| Edit \| Del
But none of ours are quite as good as 40000


#8	1-26-2007 @ 01:01:01 AM
Posted By : ricerocketboy	Reply \| Edit \| Del
#6, I don't think I've ever hit a milestone.


#9	1-26-2007 @ 01:05:53 AM
Posted By : Driven_out	Reply \| Edit \| Del
back in the day, i nailed 5000 i think EDIT! scratch that, i nailed 6000... LOL... what a coincidence... Shame its dead now. [Edited by Driven_out on 1-26-2007 @ 01:07:39 AM]


#10	1-26-2007 @ 01:07:21 AM
Posted By : Subourbon187	Reply \| Edit \| Del
#9, No, NOSsucks did rains on parade


#11	1-26-2007 @ 01:08:20 AM
Posted By : wannabemustangjockey	Reply \| Edit \| Del
#9, You got 500, I know that much.


#12	1-26-2007 @ 08:32:57 AM
Posted By : kstagger	Reply \| Edit \| Del
happy 60k


#13	5-18-2010 @ 09:33:43 PM
Posted By : wannabemustangjockey	Reply \| Edit \| Del
Oh 6K, how I miss driving you. Things need to change this summer. :(


#14	5-18-2010 @ 09:42:18 PM
Posted By : DiRF	Reply \| Edit \| Del
To be perfectly honest... your love, adoration, and devotion to a non-performance FWD GM sedan from the '80s boggles and confuses me... it's a beast from the era when GM's vehicles were poorly built with not exactly class-leading engineering merit...


#15	5-18-2010 @ 09:42:51 PM
Posted By : Adambomb	Reply \| Edit \| Del
What happened to it? Wait 6000STE non-performance? [Edited by Adambomb on 5-18-2010 @ 09:43:40 PM]


#16	5-18-2010 @ 09:45:59 PM
Posted By : DiRF	Reply \| Edit \| Del
#15, 140hp/3000lbs... if that's performance, then my 145hp/2800lb G20 is even HIGHER-performance... and, uh, that does not compute. [Edited by DiRF on 5-18-2010 @ 09:46:17 PM]


#17	5-18-2010 @ 10:00:03 PM
Posted By : wannabemustangjockey	Reply \| Edit \| Del
#16, 135hp/2823lbs, 0-60 in roughly 10 seconds. First year of EFI on that engine. Handling's good for 0.79G, stopped well enough to avoid a fairly serious crash, a coyote and a kid on a bike who rode out in front of me (different events, obviously). Was rated as a credible domestic competitor to BMW and Audi back in the day. It was a different time, people. The car is sitting in the garage awaiting work. Just like it's been since August 2008. >.<


#18	5-18-2010 @ 10:02:35 PM
Posted By : DiRF	Reply \| Edit \| Del
#17, Ok, I can see that, I guess... imagining a car with the power/weight ratio that the G20 has, but 10 years earlier... that would be pretty neat. I guess I just have some seriously bad inner biases against the quality of engineering and performance of domestic cars from the mid'70s-mid'80s...


#19	5-18-2010 @ 10:53:58 PM
Posted By : wannabemustangjockey	Reply \| Edit \| Del
#18, That's the weird thing about my car at its age. Knock on wood, the typically problematic digital dash all works perfectly but seemingly generic things like, say, the A/C, do not. That, and the electronic ride control compressor wasn't working when it was on the road, but still randomly turns itself on occasionally, which we think may be the reason why the battery wears itself down in the garage. The car still starts right up with one turn of the key. Interestingly, your G20 is taller by an inch and narrower by more than five inches. The 6K is also a good foot longer. [Edited by wannabemustangjockey on 5-18-2010 @ 10:56:36 PM]


#20	5-19-2010 @ 01:26:30 AM
Posted By : Skid	Reply \| Edit \| Del
Just remember, it's not always about numbers. My '84 Camaro made only 150 hp and weighed 3200 lbs., but I used to love driving it. Torque was excellent, though. It was also extremely reliable.

Showing page: 1 of 1
[ 1 ]

Login to leave a comment

	Classifieds
Click here to post your own classified ad

Want to send some feedback? Click here.
Server time: Wednesday, April 24, 2024 02:32:51 PM

All pictures on this site are property of their respective owners.
Copyright � 2000 - 2024 Ricecop. All rights reserved.