Go to car


Latest Comments
Car: 81412   By: ricerocketboy   Comment: "NSU Prinz too...."
Car: 81412   By: DiRF   Comment: "I can see where you're coming from in regards to t..."
Car: 81412   By: Skid   Comment: "It does bring to mind a two-door version of the la..."
Car: 81412   By: DiRF   Comment: "That is incredibly... British-looking for a BMW......"
Car: 87080   By: Low-Tech Redneck   Comment: "Push down, pull it back, and watch it go right up ..."
See last 25 comments
 Go to

Next picture
Ricecop Home
Linkage
Plates
Bling Bling
Photo
Free Post

 Top 10

Top 10 Ricers
Top 10 Non-Ricers
Top 10 Other Good
Top 10 Other Bad

 New & Retired

Newest Images
Retired Images

 Other

Submit a picture
Profile Lookup
FAQ
Site Log
Leader Board
Site Stats

 Online Now

0 Ricecops
1 Guests

Detailed List

 Login

Username:

Password:


Remember Login?

Sign up!
Why sign up?
Forgot my password


View this image at full size
Click here to let us know if the image above is broken.


Go back and vote on this image.

Picture Information
URL: http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=61306
Submitted by: DiRF
Comments: 23  (Read/Post)     Favorites: 0  (View)
Submitted on: 03-05-2007
View Stats Category: Car
Description:
Richard Hammond's 1967 Ford Mustang GT-390


   Comments

Showing page: 1 of 2
[
1 2 ]

#1
3-05-2007 @ 02:10:21 AM
Posted By : Subourbon187 Reply | Edit | Del
Lucky bastard, any vintage A-code or R-code Stangs around here cost bundles and are rare as fuck.

[Edited by Subourbon187 on 3-05-2007 @ 02:14:43 AM]


#2
3-05-2007 @ 02:11:51 AM
Posted By : wannabemustangjockey Reply | Edit | Del
I'll take that. *steals*

#3
3-05-2007 @ 02:36:58 AM
Posted By : DiRF  Reply | Edit | Del
This is from the most recent episode of Top Gear (and the last of the 9th series... don't know when the 10th series will start)

He basically compared his Mustang to a brand new Shelby GT-500 (or rather, the GT-500Almost... since he brought out a dynamometer and found it only had 447hp) ...and basically concluded that if you want a Mustang that has historic looks and is only good when going in a straight line, just buy a classic one.


#4
3-05-2007 @ 02:44:13 AM
Posted By : Sensekhmet Reply | Edit | Del
#3, I suspect that the GT500 is cheaper than the GT390, though. Am I right?

#5
3-05-2007 @ 05:10:54 AM
Posted By : wannabemustangjockey Reply | Edit | Del
#4, A GT 390 in perfect condition should go for up to $36,000 according to a price guide I found. New GT500s have an MSRP of $42975 not including dealer markup.

Here's the guide in case anyone cares.

Standard Guide To Classic Car Values
1968 Mustang Fastback GT 390 2 Door Hardtop
#6 Condition $1,700
#5 Condition $5,250
#4 Condition $8,400
#3 Condition $13,800
#2 Condition $24,900
#1 Condition $36,000


#6
3-05-2007 @ 05:29:07 AM
Posted By : Sensekhmet Reply | Edit | Del
#5, It's a steal. I was expecting some ridiculous price like 100 grand or more.

#7
3-05-2007 @ 05:32:01 AM
Posted By : MxCx Reply | Edit | Del
#6, Well its no Hemi. :P

#8
3-05-2007 @ 05:48:52 AM
Posted By : wannabemustangjockey Reply | Edit | Del
#7, The '71 Cuda convertible that went for $2 million+ last January comes to mind.

#9
3-05-2007 @ 07:15:44 AM
Posted By : Sensekhmet Reply | Edit | Del
#5, Shit, I'd buy #2 instead of a new Stang.

#10
3-05-2007 @ 08:31:29 AM
Posted By : Lemming Reply | Edit | Del
I'd rather have the new one, but I really wouldn't want that either.

#11
3-05-2007 @ 12:07:31 PM
Posted By : Subourbon187 Reply | Edit | Del
I'd buy a new GT-500, but not for much over 30K if that. Maybe I'll wait 5 or 10 years for depreciation to set in. But if it comes between a vintage GT390 and the new SVT, you just know which one I'll take.

#12
3-05-2007 @ 12:14:53 PM
Posted By : Lemming Reply | Edit | Del
I wasn't even thinking of the new GT500 model. I'd rather start with a new GT, actually.

#13
3-05-2007 @ 12:16:27 PM
Posted By : Adambomb Reply | Edit | Del
#12, Same.

#14
3-05-2007 @ 03:01:15 PM
Posted By : Subourbon187 Reply | Edit | Del
#12, Yeah, it's be a good place to start

#15
3-05-2007 @ 07:00:24 PM
Posted By : solid_snake Reply | Edit | Del
#3, Did they ever say if that was at the wheels or the flywheel? I don't recall.

#16
3-06-2007 @ 11:02:22 AM
Posted By : DiRF  Reply | Edit | Del
#15, No, they never said, but it would make sense if it was rwhp that was less than what the engine's rated as.

#17
3-06-2007 @ 07:19:03 PM
Posted By : solid_snake Reply | Edit | Del
Yeah, that's the first thing I thought.

Anyway
http://www.dragtimes.com/2007-Ford-...raphs-9894.html

And here is a video with the same result as top gear
http://video.gnvmotorsports.com/vid...81900b67cad.htm

[Edited by solid_snake on 3-06-2007 @ 07:21:36 PM]


#18
6-28-2010 @ 01:36:39 AM
Posted By : Skid Reply | Edit | Del
This is a '67.

#19
6-28-2010 @ 01:39:48 AM
Posted By : DiRF  Reply | Edit | Del
#18, That's what I said, isn't it? *whistles innocently*

#20
6-28-2010 @ 01:45:26 AM
Posted By : Skid Reply | Edit | Del
#19, OMG stealth description edit!

Showing page: 1 of 2
[
1 2 ]


Login to leave a comment

Classifieds 
Click here to post your own classified ad






Want to send some feedback? Click here.

Server time: Friday, October 20, 2017 08:32:16 AM

All pictures on this site are property of their respective owners.
Copyright 2000 - 2017 Ricecop. All rights reserved.