|
|
|
|
|
This image has expired.
Final Stats:
| Total Votes |
2 |
| Average Score |
1.00 |
| Verdict |
Not Rice
|
Showing page: 1 of 1
[ 1 ]
 |
| #3 |
4-05-2007 @ 05:33:06 PM |
| Posted By : thirtyseven |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Black F40, F50, 250 GTO, 456GT and Daytona for me please.
Mad props to Disrupture.
|
|
| #4 |
4-05-2007 @ 05:45:25 PM |
| Posted By : Disrupture |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#3, Black F40 is mine biatch !
And thanks for the props, took me some time to upload these.
|
|
| #6 |
4-05-2007 @ 08:34:30 PM |
| Posted By : Skid |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I'll take every fucking car in this garage, thank you very much, except for the Hummer H2.
Seriously, this collection houses all of the greatest Ferrari cars ever. All that's missing is a good 400 coupe and a 250 Berlinetta. And I would freaking KILL for that black F40.
|
|
| #7 |
4-05-2007 @ 08:37:53 PM |
| Posted By : thirtyseven |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#6, "all of the greatest Ferrari cars ever."
400 coupe belongs nowhere near that statement.
|
|
| #8 |
4-05-2007 @ 08:43:13 PM |
| Posted By : Skid |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#7, Of course it does. During the time period when Ferrari was pulling out substandard models like the 308s and the '80s Testarossa, the 400 was a good-looking four passenger V-12 tourer in the vein of the classic 330 GT. I'd much rather have a 400 GT with a five speed than any 456, 550, or 575.
|
|
| #9 |
4-05-2007 @ 08:45:40 PM |
| Posted By : thirtyseven |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#8, You're certainly entitled to your opinion. The Testarossa was nowhere near substandard IMO. Most would side with me in saying that the 400 was not a great Ferrari. Residuals back this up.
|
|
| #10 |
4-05-2007 @ 08:53:27 PM |
| Posted By : Skid |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#9, 1. Keep in mind that when I say "substandard," I mean by the standards of other Ferraris. I'd still drive a Testarossa, but by all accounts they did suffer from flimsy interiors and gigantic external dimensions. Once again, a great car, like nearly every Ferrari, but not one of Modena's best.
2. Seriously....why not the 400? They go largely unnoticed today due to their being a bit less ostentatious than other expensive cars of the time period, but personally I love the understated styling. It's crisp and uncluttered, certainly more so than the bloated-looking tourers that followed it.
3. "Residuals?" Are you suggesting that enthusiasts shouldn't like them just because they're modestly priced? I put little value in the opinions of the general public when it comes to automobiles.
|
|
| #11 |
4-05-2007 @ 08:53:43 PM |
| Posted By : Subourbon187 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#8, I like the 400 but I would never take it over a 456 or 550, that's just my two cents. I mean, it's depreciated to the level that even your average middle-class slob could probably buy one and it's kinda neat to have a 2+2 Ferrari, but c'mon...
[Edited by Subourbon187 on 4-05-2007 @ 08:55:11 PM]
|
|
| #13 |
4-05-2007 @ 09:00:30 PM |
| Posted By : Subourbon187 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#12, Yeah, I didn't think the 208/308 GT4 designs were all that great but the Mondial looked like it was designed by GM, the Mondial t didn't look too bad but, like I said before, c'mon.
|
|
| #14 |
4-06-2007 @ 04:14:46 PM |
| Posted By : Skid |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#13, Well I don't find the Mondial particularly attractive either. I'd drive one, but ehhhh.
|
|
| #15 |
9-25-2008 @ 04:36:50 PM |
| Posted By : Skid |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Assuming that black car hasn't been repainted, it's super-rare: Nearly all of the 1,000+ F40s produced between 1987 and 1992 were red, but apparently 9 were yellow, 2 were black, and one was custom ordered in charcoal grey by the Sultan of Brunei.
|
Showing page: 1 of 1
[ 1 ]
Login to leave a comment
|
|
|
|
|
View Stats
