Go to car


Latest Comments
Car: 97036   By: Low-Tech Redneck   Comment: ""Fold Over Rear Differential"..."
Car: 91683   By: DiRF   Comment: "Weird seeing one of these with no graphics and alm..."
Car: 80145   By: wannabemustangjockey   Comment: ""It's called a Dart Swinger because that's what th..."
Car: 92116   By: wannabemustangjockey   Comment: "Reminds me of a thread we once had of our respecti..."
Car: 97038   By: DiRF   Comment: "Is Sam Raimi shooting a movie in the vicinity?..."
See last 25 comments
 Go to

Next picture
Ricecop Home
Linkage
Plates
Bling Bling
Photo
Free Post

 Top 10

Top 10 Ricers
Top 10 Non-Ricers
Top 10 Other Good
Top 10 Other Bad

 New & Retired

Newest Images
Retired Images

 Other

Submit a picture
Profile Lookup
FAQ
Site Log
Leader Board
Site Stats

 Online Now

0 Ricecops
1 Guests

Detailed List

 Login

Username:

Password:


Remember Login?

Sign up!
Why sign up?
Forgot my password



This image has expired.

Final Stats:

Total Votes 3
Average Score 1.00
Verdict Good



Picture Information
URL: http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=70054
Submitted by: wannabemustangjockey
Comments: 17  (Read/Post)     Favorites: 0  (View)
Submitted on: 01-15-2008
View Stats Category: Photoshop/Art
Description:
GMC Monsoon concept, a Safari van done up in the style of a Syclone/Typhoon; idea by Driven_out, drawing by me. D_o also did the Monsoon logo.
http://i237.photobucket.com/albums/...soon_sunset.jpg


   Comments

Showing page: 1 of 1
[
1 ]

#1
1-15-2008 @ 03:56:56 AM
Posted By : Driven_out Reply | Edit | Del
bout time :B

#2
1-15-2008 @ 10:47:33 AM
Posted By : Adambomb Reply | Edit | Del
Nice work.

#3
1-15-2008 @ 02:07:48 PM
Posted By : Subourbon187 Reply | Edit | Del
Cool!

#4
1-15-2008 @ 02:47:34 PM
Posted By : thirtyseven Reply | Edit | Del
I'd drive it.

#5
1-15-2008 @ 06:38:52 PM
Posted By : Muntz05 Reply | Edit | Del
needs 20s

#6
1-15-2008 @ 07:07:53 PM
Posted By : Subourbon187 Reply | Edit | Del
#5, That probably wouldn't fit, these are built on S10 chassis. Unless you wanna channel the thing of course.

#7
1-15-2008 @ 07:12:32 PM
Posted By : Muntz05 Reply | Edit | Del
#6, 20s can fit anything if you try hard enough :P

#8
1-15-2008 @ 07:19:32 PM
Posted By : Obsidian Reply | Edit | Del
#6, S body is not M body.

#9
1-15-2008 @ 07:30:14 PM
Posted By : Subourbon187 Reply | Edit | Del
#8, S-series based platform. 1st gen Astros actually had shorter wheelbases than similar vintage ext. cab S-10s. And the wheel wells and gap are pretty much the same, fitting wheels in excess of 17 inches would be a bitch regardless.

And it'd look retarded. No offense, Muntz.

[Edited by Subourbon187 on 1-15-2008 @ 07:31:46 PM]


#10
1-15-2008 @ 08:24:27 PM
Posted By : Muntz05 Reply | Edit | Del
#9, oh i know, i was completely joking about it

#11
1-15-2008 @ 08:28:56 PM
Posted By : Subourbon187 Reply | Edit | Del
#10, Well it really hurt!!! *sobs*

#12
1-15-2008 @ 10:39:46 PM
Posted By : Driven_out Reply | Edit | Del
Accually... I think these were built on chassis derived from the fullsize 1500 pickup, not S10

#13
1-15-2008 @ 11:46:30 PM
Posted By : Subourbon187 Reply | Edit | Del
#12, Hmmm...I always thought it was S10, I can't remember where I heard it though. I just figured since it shared the same powerplants with the S-series that it was true.

#14
1-15-2008 @ 11:53:27 PM
Posted By : Driven_out Reply | Edit | Del
#13, I remember peeking under an astro to see if it was s10, and nothing matched compared to the chassis i know rather decently well

and i believe astros have a fullsize bolt pattern... i cant remember too well though

[Edited by Driven_out on 1-15-2008 @ 11:55:07 PM]


#15
1-15-2008 @ 11:56:15 PM
Posted By : Subourbon187 Reply | Edit | Del
#14, Well, I knew that the M-platform, if it was based off the S-10, would be a bit different to compensate for the larger body of a fullsized van. And I figured the mechanics would be different too. But are you talking about like totally different springs, K-member, tie rods, ball joints, differential and all that gobbledygook?

#16
1-15-2008 @ 11:57:51 PM
Posted By : Driven_out Reply | Edit | Del
#15, I noticed that the mounting of the rear axle was completely different, and some of the rails had unrecognizable bends

#17
1-16-2008 @ 12:03:14 AM
Posted By : Subourbon187 Reply | Edit | Del
#16, Hmmmm...perhaps I am mistaken. I guess maybe I got confused because the Sprint was based on an "M" platform too, but that was a FWD subcompact platform only. It changed when GM took over and left the engines to Suzuki.

Showing page: 1 of 1
[
1 ]


Login to leave a comment

Classifieds 
Click here to post your own classified ad






Want to send some feedback? Click here.

Server time: Sunday, October 21, 2018 12:28:23 PM

All pictures on this site are property of their respective owners.
Copyright 2000 - 2018 Ricecop. All rights reserved.