Go to car


Latest Comments
Car: 96542   By: wannabemustangjockey   Comment: "Does it know kung fu?..."
Car: 57399   By: wannabemustangjockey   Comment: "You mean you don't want Moon Pie logos all over yo..."
Car: 96546   By: ricerocketboy   Comment: "owner's an asshole too. He has a habit of running ..."
Car: 96546   By: Skid   Comment: "It looks, from what I can see, like good retail sp..."
Car: 96546   By: ricerocketboy   Comment: "so fantastic its been for lease for over 2 years...."
See last 25 comments
 Go to

Next picture
Ricecop Home
Linkage
Plates
Bling Bling
Photo
Free Post

 Top 10

Top 10 Ricers
Top 10 Non-Ricers
Top 10 Other Good
Top 10 Other Bad

 New & Retired

Newest Images
Retired Images

 Other

Submit a picture
Profile Lookup
FAQ
Site Log
Leader Board
Site Stats

 Online Now

1 Ricecops
1 Guests

Detailed List

 Login

Username:

Password:


Remember Login?

Sign up!
Why sign up?
Forgot my password


View this image at full size
Click here to let us know if the image above is broken.


Go back and vote on this image.

Picture Information
URL: http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=70054
Submitted by: wannabemustangjockey
Comments: 17  (Read/Post)     Favorites: 0  (View)
Submitted on: 01-15-2008
View Stats Category: Photoshop/Art
Description:
GMC Monsoon concept, a Safari van done up in the style of a Syclone/Typhoon; idea by Driven_out, drawing by me. D_o also did the Monsoon logo.
http://i237.photobucket.com/albums/...soon_sunset.jpg


   Comments

Showing page: 1 of 1
[
1 ]

#1
1-15-2008 @ 03:56:56 AM
Posted By : Driven_out Reply | Edit | Del
bout time :B

#2
1-15-2008 @ 10:47:33 AM
Posted By : Adambomb Reply | Edit | Del
Nice work.

#3
1-15-2008 @ 02:07:48 PM
Posted By : Subourbon187 Reply | Edit | Del
Cool!

#4
1-15-2008 @ 02:47:34 PM
Posted By : thirtyseven Reply | Edit | Del
I'd drive it.

#5
1-15-2008 @ 06:38:52 PM
Posted By : Muntz05 Reply | Edit | Del
needs 20s

#6
1-15-2008 @ 07:07:53 PM
Posted By : Subourbon187 Reply | Edit | Del
#5, That probably wouldn't fit, these are built on S10 chassis. Unless you wanna channel the thing of course.

#7
1-15-2008 @ 07:12:32 PM
Posted By : Muntz05 Reply | Edit | Del
#6, 20s can fit anything if you try hard enough :P

#8
1-15-2008 @ 07:19:32 PM
Posted By : Obsidian Reply | Edit | Del
#6, S body is not M body.

#9
1-15-2008 @ 07:30:14 PM
Posted By : Subourbon187 Reply | Edit | Del
#8, S-series based platform. 1st gen Astros actually had shorter wheelbases than similar vintage ext. cab S-10s. And the wheel wells and gap are pretty much the same, fitting wheels in excess of 17 inches would be a bitch regardless.

And it'd look retarded. No offense, Muntz.

[Edited by Subourbon187 on 1-15-2008 @ 07:31:46 PM]


#10
1-15-2008 @ 08:24:27 PM
Posted By : Muntz05 Reply | Edit | Del
#9, oh i know, i was completely joking about it

#11
1-15-2008 @ 08:28:56 PM
Posted By : Subourbon187 Reply | Edit | Del
#10, Well it really hurt!!! *sobs*

#12
1-15-2008 @ 10:39:46 PM
Posted By : Driven_out Reply | Edit | Del
Accually... I think these were built on chassis derived from the fullsize 1500 pickup, not S10

#13
1-15-2008 @ 11:46:30 PM
Posted By : Subourbon187 Reply | Edit | Del
#12, Hmmm...I always thought it was S10, I can't remember where I heard it though. I just figured since it shared the same powerplants with the S-series that it was true.

#14
1-15-2008 @ 11:53:27 PM
Posted By : Driven_out Reply | Edit | Del
#13, I remember peeking under an astro to see if it was s10, and nothing matched compared to the chassis i know rather decently well

and i believe astros have a fullsize bolt pattern... i cant remember too well though

[Edited by Driven_out on 1-15-2008 @ 11:55:07 PM]


#15
1-15-2008 @ 11:56:15 PM
Posted By : Subourbon187 Reply | Edit | Del
#14, Well, I knew that the M-platform, if it was based off the S-10, would be a bit different to compensate for the larger body of a fullsized van. And I figured the mechanics would be different too. But are you talking about like totally different springs, K-member, tie rods, ball joints, differential and all that gobbledygook?

#16
1-15-2008 @ 11:57:51 PM
Posted By : Driven_out Reply | Edit | Del
#15, I noticed that the mounting of the rear axle was completely different, and some of the rails had unrecognizable bends

#17
1-16-2008 @ 12:03:14 AM
Posted By : Subourbon187 Reply | Edit | Del
#16, Hmmmm...perhaps I am mistaken. I guess maybe I got confused because the Sprint was based on an "M" platform too, but that was a FWD subcompact platform only. It changed when GM took over and left the engines to Suzuki.

Showing page: 1 of 1
[
1 ]


Login to leave a comment

Classifieds 
Click here to post your own classified ad






Want to send some feedback? Click here.

Server time: Saturday, November 18, 2017 01:27:05 AM

All pictures on this site are property of their respective owners.
Copyright 2000 - 2017 Ricecop. All rights reserved.