Go to car


Latest Comments
Car: 98664   By: Skid   Comment: "I can only imagine how old that is, or why it's ev..."
Car: 98667   By: Skid   Comment: "Sadly, this is the natural habitat of old German c..."
Car: 85938   By: Skid   Comment: "It looks like a generic car from a cartoon, or a c..."
Car: 91935   By: DiRF   Comment: "I actually kinda liked these when they came out, b..."
Car: 85938   By: DiRF   Comment: "Normally I can find aspects of a squarish, blocky ..."
See last 25 comments
 Go to

Next picture
Ricecop Home
Linkage
Plates
Bling Bling
Photo
Free Post

 Top 10

Top 10 Ricers
Top 10 Non-Ricers
Top 10 Other Good
Top 10 Other Bad

 New & Retired

Newest Images
Retired Images

 Other

Submit a picture
Profile Lookup
FAQ
Site Log
Leader Board
Site Stats

 Online Now

2 Ricecops
1 Guests

Detailed List

 Login

Username:

Password:


Remember Login?

Sign up!
Why sign up?
Forgot my password



This image has expired.

Final Stats:

Total Votes 6
Average Score 1.00
Verdict Not Rice



Picture Information
URL: http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=72807
Submitted by: ricerocketboy
Comments: 4  (Read/Post)     Favorites: 2  (View)
Submitted on: 04-22-2008
View Stats Category: Car
Description:
Cadillac
http://i155.photobucket.com/albums/...03/100_3474.jpg
http://i155.photobucket.com/albums/...03/100_3475.jpg
http://i155.photobucket.com/albums/...03/100_3476.jpg


   Comments

Showing page: 1 of 1
[
1 ]

#1
7-11-2015 @ 09:53:14 PM
Posted By : wannabemustangjockey  Reply | Edit | Del
I love me some '64 Sedan DeVille hardtop.

#2
7-11-2015 @ 10:25:30 PM
Posted By : DiRF  Reply | Edit | Del
To be honest, I've never been fond of the '63/'64 Caddys... they looked like they were trying to recapture the elegance of the '59/'60 models, but with the newer straight, blocky aesthetic...

I mean, the '61/'62s had an all-new elegance to them that should have been extrapolated on... I don't know why Cadillac tried back-tracking.


#3
7-12-2015 @ 01:07:10 AM
Posted By : wannabemustangjockey  Reply | Edit | Del
#2, I dunno, '62 is decent but '64 and '67 are my personal favorites for the decade. The '60, '61, '63 and '68 have various small details I don't care for (mostly in the front end) and '65-66 just evokes little to no reaction from me. I guess 1969 is all right, but it looks more heavy than graceful to me.

#4
7-12-2015 @ 01:58:14 AM
Posted By : Skid Reply | Edit | Del
The '60s were just toned-down '59s. Good and well, though the bombastic nature of the '59 makes it more memorable.

'61-'62s and '63-'64s I've always found sort of dull, for whatever reason. Maybe I consider them overshadowed by the Continentals of the time period.

'65-'68s I've always liked, and I agree that 1967 is probably the best-looking year of these. 1966 was the least...there is something comparatively awkward about those.

'69-'70 had a pretty clean look, and I consider them something of a "last hurrah" before Cadillac started slipping into their tacky era.


Showing page: 1 of 1
[
1 ]


Login to leave a comment

Classifieds 
Click here to post your own classified ad






Want to send some feedback? Click here.

Server time: Thursday, March 28, 2024 08:32:11 PM

All pictures on this site are property of their respective owners.
Copyright © 2000 - 2024 Ricecop. All rights reserved.