|
|
|
|
|
This image has expired.
Final Stats:
| Total Votes |
2 |
| Average Score |
3.00 |
| Verdict |
Not Rice
|
Showing page: 1 of 1
[ 1 ]
 |
| #4 |
6-05-2008 @ 01:00:22 AM |
| Posted By : Subourbon187 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#2, What is it about the Charger that ticks you off? I'm not trying to call you out or anything, I'm just curious.
|
|
| #5 |
6-05-2008 @ 01:02:37 AM |
| Posted By : Driven_out |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#4, sedan for one, and just a complete failure stylewise, it's trying to look mean and aggressive but the execution is just so.. cheap and boring, i dont get why people like it so much.
|
|
| #6 |
6-05-2008 @ 01:06:24 AM |
| Posted By : Subourbon187 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#5, It is a bit annoying that they stick a classic nameplate on a rather heavy 4 door, but a name is just a name. I figure that as long as it's got Mercedes underpinnings and a nice beefy engine it'll make up for that. The styling I actually like, espescially on the higher models, it stands out. But that's just my opinion.
|
|
| #7 |
6-05-2008 @ 01:09:04 AM |
| Posted By : Driven_out |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#6, thats what the 300 is for. the 300c has aggressive styling without even trying too hard. i love those. same damn car without looking like a retarded brother
i'd never own a charger. even if one was given to me, it would be up for sale in a heartbeat
|
|
| #8 |
6-05-2008 @ 01:23:45 AM |
| Posted By : Subourbon187 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#7, Well, Dodge probably figured it needed an entry into the market that was a little more geared to the muscle car crowd and the retro-loyalists, something that would appeal to a demographic the 300 didn't...even if they were available with the same engine options. But regardless, I think the Charger was a good entry into a market without any really good sporty 4-doors. Why buy a 300 horse FWD Impala SS when you can get a RWD 340-horse R/T for the same price (not including options)and nearly identical fuel economy? Especially when the Charger looks arguably better than Chevy's entry into the market.
|
|
| #10 |
6-05-2008 @ 01:52:34 AM |
| Posted By : Subourbon187 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#9, To me, it's just a grandma car with more chrome-lined vents and an extra fart of horsepower.
|
|
| #11 |
6-05-2008 @ 02:37:22 AM |
| Posted By : Altima35se2003 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#10, and an interior seemingly smaller than 8 years ago and a colour scheme from which no light may enter or exit. Some clever storage solutions but I felt it was inferior to the altimae and other chevies I drove.
maybe tennessee has spoiled me ?____?
|
|
| #12 |
6-05-2008 @ 04:12:06 AM |
| Posted By : Sensekhmet |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I almost like the Charger but the fact that it isn't offered with a manual... I'd take a 300C, thank you, at least it doesn't pretend to be a performance car.
|
|
| #13 |
6-05-2008 @ 05:00:40 AM |
| Posted By : Skid |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I'll admit, the Charger SRT8 and Super Bee look better, but they're still not attractive. I'd drive one if it were given to me, though.
|
|
| #14 |
6-05-2008 @ 10:06:36 AM |
| Posted By : Subourbon187 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#11, I liked the Impala up until the 06 restyle, I felt it got waaaay too bland.
|
|
| #17 |
6-05-2008 @ 02:29:55 PM |
| Posted By : Tastycakemix |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I think timing is why this platform is successful. Its large wheel well fits the large wheel fad perfectly.
|
|
| #18 |
6-05-2008 @ 06:20:16 PM |
| Posted By : 89Rettagt |
Reply | Edit | Del |
i dont mind the 06 impala except for the chrome strip on the back. that thing is blinding in the evening.
|
|
| #19 |
6-05-2008 @ 09:22:06 PM |
| Posted By : ricerocketboy |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I like Chargers and 300s in certain colors, but usually not with bling/tacky/mundane wheels. I think a black '09 SRT-8 would do me fine.
[Edited by ricerocketboy on 6-05-2008 @ 09:23:27 PM]
|
Showing page: 1 of 1
[ 1 ]
Login to leave a comment
|
|
|
|
|
View Stats
