Go to car


Latest Comments
Car: 37161   By: DiRF   Comment: "As a piggyback on that... still on my vacation in ..."
Car: 37161   By: DiRF   Comment: "So, apparently, Kranefuss wasn't the *only* team o..."
Car: 78637   By: DiRF   Comment: "Welp, Renault-Samsung Motors doesn't exist as a br..."
Car: Fpost   By: DiRF   Comment: "Just got in today. Will hit the Hall of Fame tomor..."
Car: Fpost   By: ricerocketboy   Comment: "sweet :D I have never done that. :) Hows is it?..."
See last 25 comments
 Go to

Next picture
Ricecop Home
Linkage
Plates
Bling Bling
Photo
Free Post

 Top 10

Top 10 Ricers
Top 10 Non-Ricers
Top 10 Other Good
Top 10 Other Bad

 New & Retired

Newest Images
Retired Images

 Other

Submit a picture
Profile Lookup
FAQ
Site Log
Leader Board
Site Stats

 Online Now

1 Ricecops
1 Guests

Detailed List

 Login

Username:

Password:


Remember Login?

Sign up!
Why sign up?
Forgot my password



This image has expired.

Final Stats:

Total Votes 8
Average Score 1.00
Verdict Not Rice



Picture Information
URL: http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=73909
Submitted by: ricerocketboy
Comments: 18  (Read/Post)     Favorites: 0  (View)
Submitted on: 06-09-2008
View Stats Category: Car
Description:
Chevy Corvette Collector's Edition
http://i150.photobucket.com/albums/...02/100_5997.jpg
http://i150.photobucket.com/albums/...02/100_5999.jpg


   Comments

Showing page: 1 of 1
[
1 ]

#1
6-09-2008 @ 11:24:24 PM
Posted By : Subourbon187 Reply | Edit | Del
Nice looking but so underpowered

#2
6-09-2008 @ 11:27:59 PM
Posted By : DiRF  Reply | Edit | Del
Woo... a thundering 195hp from one of the worst fuel-injection systems ever installed in a "sports car"...

But damn is it a pretty car.


#3
6-09-2008 @ 11:31:44 PM
Posted By : Adambomb Reply | Edit | Del
Agreed

#4
6-10-2008 @ 12:21:32 AM
Posted By : Subourbon187 Reply | Edit | Del
Drove alongside a C3 of similar vintage the other day. I never realized how low they rode, at least in comparison to my Chrysler. I felt like I was sitting a foot higher than the lady driving the Vette. It was the same color if I recall so it might have been a "Special Edition" as well.

#5
6-10-2008 @ 03:06:27 AM
Posted By : Skid Reply | Edit | Del
Spend about $2500 on a decent 350 crate engine and bolt it in. Problem solved.

#6
6-10-2008 @ 03:11:53 AM
Posted By : Muntz05 Reply | Edit | Del
#5, losing originality will have you killed in some circles.

i always say fuck original parts, make the car your own, and make it a blast to drive. its your car.


#7
6-10-2008 @ 03:16:14 AM
Posted By : UFO Reply | Edit | Del
#6, Thats the difference between having a car you want, and having a car you think the next owner will want.
I'll choose the former everytime


#8
6-10-2008 @ 03:16:35 AM
Posted By : Subourbon187 Reply | Edit | Del
#6, I agree when you have a sub 200hp factory motor in a car known for stomping all over Mustangs, Imports and the like. But I can't stand it when these yuppie baby boomers start hacking up classics with chrome and LS1's and dayglo paint. Originality is one thing, being an attention grubbing dickhead is another.

[Edited by Subourbon187 on 6-10-2008 @ 03:16:52 AM]


#9
6-10-2008 @ 03:22:32 AM
Posted By : Muntz05 Reply | Edit | Del
#8, there's a fine line. i attended a carshow this weekend with mostly older cars (i promise i'll upload the pics if i ever get a free second) lots of 40s and 50s cars had newer LS1s and such crammed in them, and were laughed out of the lot, while a few older camaros and mustangs that were built with edelbrock parts, and basically custom tuned were frowned upon as if they were in the same circle because of the loss of originality. in my opinion, something simply being OLD doesn't make it show worthy. while the cars are beautiful, i'd rather see someone's hard work be poured into something rather than see them buy it, never drive it, and keep it covered in a garage for 40+ years.

#10
6-10-2008 @ 03:28:17 AM
Posted By : Subourbon187 Reply | Edit | Del
#9, I know people are going to customize their cars however they want to...they have every right to. But we reserve the right to chastise them if we find the modifications disagreeable. As far as classics go, I'm definitely not saying that someone should stash their first gen Camaro in a garage under a tarp until the rapture. I just think that one should stop and think before taking a sawzall and doing something to their classic car that'll cut it's collector's value in half. If people never modified their cars in any way, then no automotive subculture would exist.

#11
6-10-2008 @ 03:31:37 AM
Posted By : Muntz05 Reply | Edit | Del
#10, i agree with you. there are only so many mint vehicles available as the cars from the middle of the last century become more rare. i'm just saying that i hate to see guys with cars from the 60s get praised because they've simply done nothing but own them for a while, while dudes that tastefully (and i use the term loosely) modify their old school vehicles to give them some flavor

#12
6-10-2008 @ 03:33:04 AM
Posted By : Skid Reply | Edit | Del
I don't know what you guys are going on about...this is only a 1982 model. It's not exactly museum material yet.

Plus, there are plenty of these around with low mileage on them....open up any Classic Car Trader and you'll find at least two with under 50k original miles. There's a big difference between dropping a crate engine (easily reversible, BTW) into a 1982 'Vette, and then hacking an original 1940s vintage sedan to pieces and gluing a lot of billet to it.


#13
6-10-2008 @ 03:38:25 AM
Posted By : Subourbon187 Reply | Edit | Del
#11, Yeah, there are too many over-tanned old farts acting like their God's gift to the ladies auxiliary at the local car cruises over the summer. They show off the 40 year old Hot Rod they bought two years ago from out of state and haven't even so much as changed a spark plug on. To me they're just as lame as all the 20-something turd burglars who throw big wheels on a newer car their parents bought them and derive their self worth from how many coats of wax they put on it.

#12, We were talking more about the culture of car modifying rather than any specific car.

[Edited by Subourbon187 on 6-10-2008 @ 03:39:37 AM]


#14
6-10-2008 @ 03:41:54 AM
Posted By : wannabemustangjockey  Reply | Edit | Del
I can appreciate a good old car that's been kept stock.
I can appreciate a decently-kept unrestored car.
I can appreciate a period-correct, everything correct car.
I can appreciate a tastefully modified car.
I can accept/appreciate a sleeper if it's been done well and is tasteful in appearance, especially if it appears totally stock on the outside.
I can accept a rare car that's been customized/modded IF it could not have been restored to stock within reasonable means.
I cannot respect a hacked-up Bondo wagon.
I cannot respect a classic that has been Pro-Streeted for no good reason.
I cannot respect a classic that's been subjected to mods that are totally wrong for it (prime example: 61870)
I cannot respect an owner who is a douche.


#15
6-10-2008 @ 03:47:20 AM
Posted By : Skid Reply | Edit | Del
#14, Same, although hacked-up bondo wagons have a special place in my heart. :)

I also don't assume that every stock, show-quality vintage car is never driven. What rule says an older car has to have an Edelbrock carburator and Cragar wheels before it can be street-driven?


#16
6-10-2008 @ 10:17:51 AM
Posted By : 89Rettagt Reply | Edit | Del
#10, canadian tarp?

dropping a big block in a 6cyl car is no tragedy in my eyes.


#17
6-10-2008 @ 04:39:11 PM
Posted By : Tastycakemix Reply | Edit | Del
#5, x2.

Stick a LS2 or LSx in there and rule.

I'm ok with originality but the designers and factory workers weren't ancient beings that must be respected. They were just average folks and interns with massive deadlines that had to adhere to regulations. If I designed a car years back, I'd take huge pride in it. However, if 30 yrs later someone wanted to put a more powerful engine in one of my cars that they bought? i'd be honored!!

If someone came and said "No, you must leave the factory engine in there." I'd say "Whatta doing?? If you want nastalgia go ahead. I want my design to stay modern + history vs. just history."

If someone was willing to solve known problems in my design years later, go right ahead. When Chop Shop did a redo of a Bricklin, Malcolm Bricklin was extremely happy. He didn't want them to do a complete resto.

Some of these cars are just cars, not art work that cannot be improved.


#18
6-10-2008 @ 04:47:03 PM
Posted By : wannabemustangjockey  Reply | Edit | Del
#17, Bricklin was probably just happy they gave him attention and didn't associate his name solely with the Yugo :P

Showing page: 1 of 1
[
1 ]


Login to leave a comment

Classifieds 
Click here to post your own classified ad






Want to send some feedback? Click here.

Server time: Thursday, April 25, 2024 06:45:15 PM

All pictures on this site are property of their respective owners.
Copyright © 2000 - 2024 Ricecop. All rights reserved.