Go to car


Latest Comments
Car: 91935   By: DiRF   Comment: "I actually kinda liked these when they came out, b..."
Car: 85938   By: DiRF   Comment: "Normally I can find aspects of a squarish, blocky ..."
Car: 96594   By: Skid   Comment: "If I could have any 911, it would be the short-nos..."
Car: 44941   By: DiRF   Comment: "So, North Wilkesboro has been refurbished, and ret..."
Car: 96905   By: Adambomb   Comment: "This things been sitting at an oil change place ne..."
See last 25 comments
 Go to

Next picture
Ricecop Home
Linkage
Plates
Bling Bling
Photo
Free Post

 Top 10

Top 10 Ricers
Top 10 Non-Ricers
Top 10 Other Good
Top 10 Other Bad

 New & Retired

Newest Images
Retired Images

 Other

Submit a picture
Profile Lookup
FAQ
Site Log
Leader Board
Site Stats

 Online Now

1 Ricecops
1 Guests

Detailed List

 Login

Username:

Password:


Remember Login?

Sign up!
Why sign up?
Forgot my password



This image has expired.

Final Stats:

Total Votes 0
Average Score 0.00
Verdict Not Rice



Picture Information
URL: http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=76248
Submitted by: wannabemustangjockey
Comments: 5  (Read/Post)     Favorites: 0  (View)
Submitted on: 09-28-2008
View Stats Category: Vehicle Group
Description:
Acura MDX, Range Rover Sport, and Range Rover.


   Comments

Showing page: 1 of 1
[
1 ]

#1
2-25-2010 @ 11:21:00 PM
Posted By : Skid Reply | Edit | Del
Just saw a commercial on TV for the MDX, bragging about its "innovative" body structure, which collapses in some areas, but stays rigid in others, to redirect energy around the cabin.

Personally, I wasn't aware crumple zones were something new.


#2
2-26-2010 @ 08:18:58 AM
Posted By : DiRF  Reply | Edit | Del
#1, Well, when your company's SUV looks like a radioactively deformed chipmunk, there's not much positive you can say about it.

#3
2-26-2010 @ 04:43:27 PM
Posted By : Sensekhmet Reply | Edit | Del
#1, Guess Acura/Honda missed the ESV program and Mercedes crash test research... from the 1950s.

#4
8-12-2014 @ 03:13:46 PM
Posted By : ricerocketboy Reply | Edit | Del
I hate to say it, but I'd chose the MDX over the Rovers for reliability's sake. Plus, when you're inside the car you don't have to look at the damned thing.

#5
8-12-2014 @ 05:52:37 PM
Posted By : DiRF  Reply | Edit | Del
#4, I remember when Top Gear were comparing the Panamera, Quattroporte, and Rapide... Jeremy loved driving the Panamera because it was fantastic to drive, had a great interior, and whilst inside it, he couldn't see the outside of it...

...unless he drove by a storefront and saw his reflection...


Showing page: 1 of 1
[
1 ]


Login to leave a comment

Classifieds 
Click here to post your own classified ad






Want to send some feedback? Click here.

Server time: Thursday, March 28, 2024 07:36:16 PM

All pictures on this site are property of their respective owners.
Copyright © 2000 - 2024 Ricecop. All rights reserved.