Go to car


Latest Comments
Car: 95884   By: Skid   Comment: "Someone released Mulholland Drive as a track....11..."
Car: 98674   By: Skid   Comment: "Given the very low point Trans Ams performance was..."
Car: 98675   By: Skid   Comment: "I'm forever on the hunt for the XK140 dropheads th..."
Car: 98673   By: Skid   Comment: "Now THAT is a cool find. I love the British Fords..."
Car: 43287   By: Skid   Comment: "Whoo boy, there's a memory......"
See last 25 comments
 Go to

Next picture
Ricecop Home
Linkage
Plates
Bling Bling
Photo
Free Post

 Top 10

Top 10 Ricers
Top 10 Non-Ricers
Top 10 Other Good
Top 10 Other Bad

 New & Retired

Newest Images
Retired Images

 Other

Submit a picture
Profile Lookup
FAQ
Site Log
Leader Board
Site Stats

 Online Now

0 Ricecops
1 Guests

Detailed List

 Login

Username:

Password:


Remember Login?

Sign up!
Why sign up?
Forgot my password



This image has expired.

Final Stats:

Total Votes 6
Average Score 8.33
Verdict Rice



Picture Information
URL: http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=77104
Submitted by: wannabemustangjockey
Comments: 6  (Read/Post)     Favorites: 0  (View)
Submitted on: 11-18-2008
View Stats Category: Car
Description:
Accessorized Chevy HHR.


   Comments

Showing page: 1 of 1
[
1 ]

#1
11-18-2008 @ 02:13:16 AM
Posted By : Subourbon187 Reply | Edit | Del
It just screams "I'm owned by a 59 year old accountant from Florida"

#2
6-25-2016 @ 11:36:07 PM
Posted By : ricerocketboy Reply | Edit | Del
HHR: Because you're not original enough for a PT Cruiser.


#3
6-26-2016 @ 03:44:20 PM
Posted By : DiRF  Reply | Edit | Del
#2, To be fair, the HHR was superior to the PT Cruiser in every conceivable way.

#4
6-26-2016 @ 11:07:15 PM
Posted By : ricerocketboy Reply | Edit | Del
#3, except retail value. And the 2.2 Ecotec is crap.

#5
6-27-2016 @ 12:04:58 AM
Posted By : DiRF  Reply | Edit | Del
#4, So, that means they're cheaper than a PT Cruiser on the used market? I don't see that as a downside...

Despite any negatives associated with the 2.2 Ecotec, it's still gotta be better than the antiquated Neon 4-banger.


#6
6-27-2016 @ 12:41:43 AM
Posted By : ricerocketboy Reply | Edit | Del
#5, Eh, I don't know. I've spent time in both, and despite my prejudice against Chrysler products (long line of Chrysler lemons), I'd take a PT over an HHR. The PT seemed better put together, and had more interior room it felt like. It also could get over the Rockies reasonably well. Unlike the HHR which seemed like it was gasping for air at every hill. :/

Showing page: 1 of 1
[
1 ]


Login to leave a comment

Classifieds 
Click here to post your own classified ad






Want to send some feedback? Click here.

Server time: Thursday, April 18, 2024 01:35:51 PM

All pictures on this site are property of their respective owners.
Copyright © 2000 - 2024 Ricecop. All rights reserved.