Ricecop's Rice Or Not?

Latest Comments

Car: 95884	By: Skid	Comment: "Someone released Mulholland Drive as a track....11..."
Car: 98674	By: Skid	Comment: "Given the very low point Trans Ams performance was..."
Car: 98675	By: Skid	Comment: "I'm forever on the hunt for the XK140 dropheads th..."
Car: 98673	By: Skid	Comment: "Now THAT is a cool find. I love the British Fords..."
Car: 43287	By: Skid	Comment: "Whoo boy, there's a memory......"

See last 25 comments

Go to
Next picture Ricecop Home Linkage Plates Bling Bling Photo Free Post

Top 10
Top 10 Ricers Top 10 Non-Ricers Top 10 Other Good Top 10 Other Bad

New & Retired
Newest Images Retired Images

Other
Submit a picture Profile Lookup FAQ Site Log Leader Board Site Stats

Online Now
0 Ricecops 1 Guests Detailed List

This image has expired.

Final Stats:

Total Votes	6
Average Score	1.17
Verdict	Not Rice

Picture Information
URL: http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=83086	Submitted by: wannabemustangjockey
Comments: 12 (Read/Post) Favorites: 0 (View)	Submitted on: 09-22-2010
View Stats	Category: Car

Description: Mercedes SLS AMG http://i935.photobucket.com/albums/...10/100_4699.jpg http://i935.photobucket.com/albums/...10/100_4701.jpg http://i935.photobucket.com/albums/...10/100_4700.jpg http://i935.photobucket.com/albums/...10/100_4823.jpg

Showing page: 1 of 1
[ 1 ]


#1	9-22-2010 @ 04:30:05 AM
Posted By : Skid	Reply \| Edit \| Del
Compared to the sinuous lines of 83087, this car just looks clunky and awkward from every angle.


#2	9-22-2010 @ 04:31:23 AM
Posted By : MxCx	Reply \| Edit \| Del
Nope. Looks amazing. Looks modern. Except for the back..its just an afterthought.. [Edited by MxCx on 9-22-2010 @ 04:32:11 AM]


#3	9-22-2010 @ 04:32:47 AM
Posted By : Skid	Reply \| Edit \| Del
#2, Just not seeing it. The SLR McLaren looked good, but this just doesn't.


#4	9-22-2010 @ 04:33:52 AM
Posted By : ricerocketboy	Reply \| Edit \| Del
#3, opposite for me.


#5	9-22-2010 @ 05:36:11 AM
Posted By : wannabemustangjockey	Reply \| Edit \| Del
#2, Honestly, I tend to agree with you on this. It does look modern, and it's certainly striking. But the ass end is HORRIBLE. The whole package, really, evokes nothing from me other than "dude, an SLS!" click click click But is it pretty? At all? In my opinion at least, it isn't. You may feel differently about it. I'd say that the front 3/4 is definitely the car's best angle, particularly when biased more towards the front and less to the side.


#6	9-22-2010 @ 06:37:02 AM
Posted By : Driven_out	Reply \| Edit \| Del
when i seen one of these in person, i thought the same, it was okay in the front but the rear end is such an abortion its not even funny


#7	9-22-2010 @ 08:26:02 AM
Posted By : DiRF	Reply \| Edit \| Del
I hate the headlights. I hate the super-thick C-pillar that's lacking the rear-quarter window from the '50s gullwing. I hate the lack of plaid seats... and, is that fuel filler cap stock? I don't like that either. Everything else is awesome, though.


#8	9-22-2010 @ 03:07:14 PM
Posted By : Skid	Reply \| Edit \| Del
The worst part, for me, would be the doors. The almost vertical front door line doesn't match the rest of the car at all, and just makes the whole thing look awkward and blocky. And both the door sill and headlights are too far up, which makes the car look tall. I just look at it, and the first word that crosses my mind is "truck."


#9	9-22-2010 @ 08:17:03 PM
Posted By : Obsidian	Reply \| Edit \| Del
That B-pillar is too fucking big.


#10	9-22-2010 @ 08:24:03 PM
Posted By : DiRF	Reply \| Edit \| Del
#9, Like I said, (though, referring to it as a C-pillar), it SERIOUSLY needs a rear-quarter window like the old Gullwing Merc had...


#11	9-26-2010 @ 06:44:59 PM
Posted By : Obsidian	Reply \| Edit \| Del
#10, They could - but I think the inclusion of a rear-quarter window might jeopardize the structrual integrity of the roof which is oh-so-fucking important for the doors. Incidently - why would you call it a c-pillar? Doesn't the naming of pillars follow alphabetically? From A skiping B and going to C seems wrong to me.


#12	9-26-2010 @ 07:31:41 PM
Posted By : DiRF	Reply \| Edit \| Del
#11, Sorry, so used to calling the pillar that holds the backglass as the C-pillar... force of habit, I guess.

Showing page: 1 of 1
[ 1 ]

Login to leave a comment

	Classifieds
Click here to post your own classified ad

Want to send some feedback? Click here.
Server time: Saturday, April 20, 2024 02:45:41 AM

All pictures on this site are property of their respective owners.
Copyright � 2000 - 2024 Ricecop. All rights reserved.