Go to car

Latest Comments
Car: 96930   By: ricerocketboy   Comment: "XJ wheels...."
Car: 96999   By: ricerocketboy   Comment: "I don't think this was ever intended to sell here...."
Car: 96931   By: ricerocketboy   Comment: "'66?..."
Car: 97004   By: Adambomb   Comment: "https://c2.staticflickr.com/2/1875/44700034152_c6c..."
Car: 92571   By: Obsidian   Comment: "AND you could press F or C at any time to change t..."
See last 25 comments
 Go to

Next picture
Ricecop Home
Bling Bling
Free Post

 Top 10

Top 10 Ricers
Top 10 Non-Ricers
Top 10 Other Good
Top 10 Other Bad

 New & Retired

Newest Images
Retired Images


Submit a picture
Profile Lookup
Site Log
Leader Board
Site Stats

 Online Now

0 Ricecops
1 Guests

Detailed List




Remember Login?

Sign up!
Why sign up?
Forgot my password

This image has expired.

Final Stats:

Total Votes 1
Average Score 1.00
Verdict Not Rice

Picture Information
URL: http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=83323
Submitted by: 427 Vette
Comments: 11  (Read/Post)     Favorites: 0  (View)
Submitted on: 10-12-2010
View Stats Category: Car
The new Chrysler 200. I thought it was a rebadged Hyundai. 2.4 I4 or 3.6 V6 power it.



Showing page: 1 of 1
1 ]

10-12-2010 @ 04:37:53 PM
Posted By : wannabemustangjockey Reply | Edit | Del
So it looks to be a current-gen Sebring that mated with a 2010 Saab 9-5. Brilliant work, Chrysler.

10-12-2010 @ 05:00:01 PM
Posted By : Skid Reply | Edit | Del
I've long been something of a Mopar fan, and a great admirer of the history of Chrysler vehicles. But with shit like this, it's hard to sympathize with them. They've blown so many damn opportunities....

Granted, I don't know much about this car yet, but something tells me it involves a plasticky interior, substandard all-around performance, and transmissions that fail like clockwork every 100,000 miles.

10-12-2010 @ 06:25:04 PM
Posted By : ricerocketboy Reply | Edit | Del
#2, It's a new front and rear fascia on the old Sebring body. The interior is all new, too, as well as the 3.6 Pentastar V6, which will be used in everything from this to to the Caravan.

10-12-2010 @ 06:43:12 PM
Posted By : Driven_out Reply | Edit | Del
i I think it looks good honestly.

10-12-2010 @ 08:41:55 PM
Posted By : DiRF  Reply | Edit | Del
#1, Aye... the angles they made available in the images... I think they're desperately trying to hide the fact that it's still the same body with new fascias... admittedly, the fascias are much, much better.

10-12-2010 @ 08:56:27 PM
Posted By : ricerocketboy Reply | Edit | Del
#5, There's no arguing that, it just looks.. Chinese? It went from being an ugly-ass car to being a decent-looking blandmobile. I don't think anyone who's not really into cars/doesn't keep up with the auto industry would know this is a Chrysler. I don't know if that's a bad thing. Time will tell, though.

10-12-2010 @ 09:04:42 PM
Posted By : DiRF  Reply | Edit | Del
The fascias, for me, look like a blend of new-Jaguar and Lexus ES... to be honest, I never had issue with the *body* of the Sebring... so they fixed the parts that I felt were blech.

But, yeah, I seriously hope they update the interior with better styling and materials... I still remember that my dad had seriously considered getting a Sebring convertible in '97 (he eventually got the LHS), but when he tried a Sebring convertible last year, he was shocked at how HORRID it was, even compared to the Sebring from 12 years prior.

10-12-2010 @ 09:20:33 PM
Posted By : ricerocketboy Reply | Edit | Del
#7, Yeah. The interior on the new Durango (while bland as all fuck) looks to be in a major step in the right direction. My girlfriend had the (dis)pleasure of renting a Compass for awhile a couple weeks back when she brought her daily in for servicing. The interior on that made my 1997 Monte seem like a Mercedes. And I hated the interior on that thing. The Compass interior looks like a great interior.. for a 1992 Dodge Caravan. I mean, I know it was a "entry level" Jeep.. but when a contemporary Hyundai Accent has a nicer interior..well.. there's a problem. I could go on and on about the Compass but I won't.

10-12-2010 @ 09:42:16 PM
Posted By : DiRF  Reply | Edit | Del
#8, This is completely unrelated, but I will state that there are two vehicles that, regardless of model year, every time I've been in one I've found the interior to be absolutely soul-suckingly depressing... Hyundai Elantras and Honda Civics.

8-12-2014 @ 11:16:03 PM
Posted By : ricerocketboy Reply | Edit | Del
Honestly, this rehash wasn't a terrible idea. Yes, the car still suffers from Chrysler's idea of making the base car look and feel cheap, and the upper-echelon models look and feel rather nice, but its a better car than the Sebring it replaced.

I see the new 200 on the road, and I actually quite like it. It looks, good, and even the base model looks fairly nice, and not just for what it is, either.

I almost wish I had got one, then I realized the dog, and he probably wouldn't fit.

Unfortunately, I can't say the same about the Dodge Avenger, which I never really liked.

8-12-2014 @ 11:21:13 PM
Posted By : Skid Reply | Edit | Del
Yeah, apparently it turned out to be not-so-bad.

Showing page: 1 of 1
1 ]

Login to leave a comment

Click here to post your own classified ad

Want to send some feedback? Click here.

Server time: Wednesday, September 19, 2018 04:49:32 AM

All pictures on this site are property of their respective owners.
Copyright 2000 - 2018 Ricecop. All rights reserved.