Go to car


Latest Comments
Car: 96574   By: Skid   Comment: "1984. Nice to see an early third gen kicking aroun..."
Car: 96572   By: Skid   Comment: "I'd like to switch places with the owner of this c..."
Car: 96575   By: wannabemustangjockey   Comment: "Oh, you lost your petrol flap? You haven't lived ..."
Car: 33716   By: wannabemustangjockey   Comment: "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y7oUWqoKXVc And no..."
Car: 40944   By: DiRF   Comment: "Correction: Fat Urbo. Obviously, they're obsessed ..."
See last 25 comments
 Go to

Next picture
Ricecop Home
Linkage
Plates
Bling Bling
Photo
Free Post

 Top 10

Top 10 Ricers
Top 10 Non-Ricers
Top 10 Other Good
Top 10 Other Bad

 New & Retired

Newest Images
Retired Images

 Other

Submit a picture
Profile Lookup
FAQ
Site Log
Leader Board
Site Stats

 Online Now

1 Ricecops
1 Guests

Detailed List

 Login

Username:

Password:


Remember Login?

Sign up!
Why sign up?
Forgot my password



This image has expired.

Final Stats:

Total Votes 3
Average Score 7.00
Verdict Rice



Picture Information
URL: http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=84031
Submitted by: 427 Vette
Comments: 7  (Read/Post)     Favorites: 0  (View)
Submitted on: 01-18-2011
View Stats Category: Car
Description:
Audi R8 'Tron' by WCC and overpriced Monster Cables

http://www.westcoastcustoms.com/blog/?p=2808


   Comments

Showing page: 1 of 1
[
1 ]

#1
1-18-2011 @ 03:21:07 PM
Posted By : DiRF  Reply | Edit | Del
If enough people learn about Monoprice.com, Monster Cables can be put out of business, along with all the other HDMI cable companies that sell their wares in Best Buy and Walmart.

#2
1-18-2011 @ 07:53:21 PM
Posted By : Obsidian Reply | Edit | Del
#1, I'm technologically innept with a mean temporal displacement of about 10 years. With that - squabbles about HDMI video quality and the price one pays cabling is moot.

In a way - it's quite satisfying to not gripe over the price of HDMI cables and watch others do the bitching and moaning; relentlessly defending Monster Cables and their 'claim' to superiority - but my pleasure comes with not seeing HD shit on my monitor likely well into the 2010's.


#3
1-18-2011 @ 08:01:45 PM
Posted By : DiRF  Reply | Edit | Del
#2, I agree that squabbling over a small price difference would be lame...

...but we're talking $4-8 versus $50-100.


#4
1-18-2011 @ 09:21:57 PM
Posted By : Obsidian Reply | Edit | Del
#3, I know they're a ripoff. Sometimes I just like listening to the lame excuses some of the 'monster converts' use justify the price gap vs. measureable and visual performance.

#5
1-18-2011 @ 09:47:11 PM
Posted By : DiRF  Reply | Edit | Del
#4, The thing is, HDMI delivers a digital signal... there's no real "quality" argument like there is with analog signals. Either you get the signal or you don't. The only thing with HDMI is many devices now require "high-speed" bandwidth HDMI, to transmit more digital data... but, yeah, the Monoprice "high speed" cables do as good of a job as any silver-plated, quadruple-sheathed UBERMEGAMONSTER cable...

#6
1-18-2011 @ 09:50:12 PM
Posted By : Obsidian Reply | Edit | Del
#5, I also parade my ignorance of HDMI. For me - if there's an image - however faint and low res - that's all that matters.

#7
1-26-2011 @ 05:08:25 AM
Posted By : Bling24 Reply | Edit | Del
#2, I smell your frugal smugness from quite a long way away sir.

Showing page: 1 of 1
[
1 ]


Login to leave a comment

Classifieds 
Click here to post your own classified ad






Want to send some feedback? Click here.

Server time: Friday, December 15, 2017 01:34:54 AM

All pictures on this site are property of their respective owners.
Copyright 2000 - 2017 Ricecop. All rights reserved.