Go to car


Latest Comments
Car: 91522   By: Adambomb   Comment: "This brings back memories of warmer times...."
Car: Fpost   By: Adambomb   Comment: "http://www.hotrod.com/articles/1933-continental-co..."
Car: Fpost   By: DiRF   Comment: "Oddly appropriate, being surrounded by other Korea..."
Car: Fpost   By: Adambomb   Comment: "One of these too http://row52.com/Vehicle/Index/KL..."
Car: Fpost   By: Skid   Comment: "Holy shit, there's still one of these left? http:..."
See last 25 comments
 Go to

Next picture
Ricecop Home
Linkage
Plates
Bling Bling
Photo
Free Post

 Top 10

Top 10 Ricers
Top 10 Non-Ricers
Top 10 Other Good
Top 10 Other Bad

 New & Retired

Newest Images
Retired Images

 Other

Submit a picture
Profile Lookup
FAQ
Site Log
Leader Board
Site Stats

 Online Now

0 Ricecops
1 Guests

Detailed List

 Login

Username:

Password:


Remember Login?

Sign up!
Why sign up?
Forgot my password


View this image at full size
Click here to let us know if the image above is broken.


Go back and vote on this image.

Picture Information
URL: http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=85355
Submitted by: Low-Tech Redneck
Comments: 3  (Read/Post)     Favorites: 0  (View)
Submitted on: 08-26-2011
View Stats Category: Other Vehicle
Description:
The Vought F7U Cutlass. Holds the distinction of being the most ludicrously UNSAFE aircraft ever fielded by the US Navy, or for that matter, the US Armed Forces in general. About 1/4 of the ~200 aircraft built were lost in accidents, including 21 fatal crashes. Airmen dubbed it the "Gutless" due to notoriously poor engines that could flame-out by flying through RAIN


   Comments

Showing page: 1 of 1
[
1 ]

#1
8-26-2011 @ 04:32:40 AM
Posted By : DiRF  Reply | Edit | Del
Hmmm... don't recall this plane appearing in my "World's Worst Aircraft" coffee table book... they must have missed this one.

#2
8-26-2011 @ 04:42:13 AM
Posted By : Low-Tech Redneck Reply | Edit | Del
In addition to anemic engines, the landing gear had a habit of collapsing, the ejection seat could fire without being ordered to do so, the hydraulics could (and did) totally fail without warning ( and the backup system took 10 seconds to come on, during which time the plane went wherever it had last been pointed ) When Chicago's O'Hare airport was built in 1953, the first plane to land there was a Cutlass, making an emergency landing after losing it's engines.... these things were GARBAGE. The engines were a notoriously poor design from Westinghouse, mechanics joked that a Westinghouse brand toaster could put out more heat.

#3
12-09-2013 @ 08:29:22 PM
Posted By : Low-Tech Redneck Reply | Edit | Del
#2, All that said, most of the deficiencies were the result of technology not keeping pace with design, overall, the idea of a swept wing twin-engined jet interceptor/fighter wasn't flawed, you can see a lot of the later very successful F14 Tomcat in the Cutlass' lines, it's quite impressive to see something that got the overall shape of Naval Aviation through the early 21st century right, all the way back in 1950, but just botching that initial execution.

Showing page: 1 of 1
[
1 ]


Login to leave a comment

Classifieds 
Click here to post your own classified ad






Want to send some feedback? Click here.

Server time: Sunday, December 17, 2017 07:13:00 AM

All pictures on this site are property of their respective owners.
Copyright 2000 - 2017 Ricecop. All rights reserved.