Ricecop's Rice Or Not?

Latest Comments

Car: 95884	By: Skid	Comment: "Someone released Mulholland Drive as a track....11..."
Car: 98674	By: Skid	Comment: "Given the very low point Trans Ams performance was..."
Car: 98675	By: Skid	Comment: "I'm forever on the hunt for the XK140 dropheads th..."
Car: 98673	By: Skid	Comment: "Now THAT is a cool find. I love the British Fords..."
Car: 43287	By: Skid	Comment: "Whoo boy, there's a memory......"

See last 25 comments

Go to
Next picture Ricecop Home Linkage Plates Bling Bling Photo Free Post

Top 10
Top 10 Ricers Top 10 Non-Ricers Top 10 Other Good Top 10 Other Bad

New & Retired
Newest Images Retired Images

Other
Submit a picture Profile Lookup FAQ Site Log Leader Board Site Stats

Online Now
0 Ricecops 1 Guests Detailed List

This image has expired.

Final Stats:

Total Votes	0
Average Score	0.00
Verdict	Not Rice

Picture Information
URL: http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=86647	Submitted by: ricerocketboy
Comments: 12 (Read/Post) Favorites: 0 (View)	Submitted on: 02-21-2012
View Stats	Category: Car

Description: Buick Skylark GS http://i1104.photobucket.com/albums...ct_8/005-13.jpg http://i1104.photobucket.com/albums...ct_8/006-15.jpg http://i1104.photobucket.com/albums...ct_8/007-16.jpg http://i1104.photobucket.com/albums...ct_8/008-14.jpg

Showing page: 1 of 1
[ 1 ]


#1	2-21-2012 @ 08:17:35 AM
Posted By : DiRF	Reply \| Edit \| Del
I still like the styling on these... and when equipped with the V6, they're scoot pretty damn good, too.


#2	8-25-2015 @ 06:07:45 PM
Posted By : ricerocketboy	Reply \| Edit \| Del
http://redwoodautosales.com/Details...dwood-Falls-MN/ :(


#3	8-25-2015 @ 06:15:17 PM
Posted By : DiRF	Reply \| Edit \| Del
#2, Would have been absolutely perfect for one of those Top Gear $1000 cheap car challenges... but it probably wouldn't provide for enough interesting TV "drama"... ...as an aside, so, not only is Photobucket now a bloated piece of shit website, it now takes forever to load its images. For those of you that use Flickr and/or imgur, thank you. Thank you so much.


#4	8-25-2015 @ 06:26:00 PM
Posted By : ricerocketboy	Reply \| Edit \| Del
#3, Which is why I switched to Flickr. Better image quality, little compression, less decoloring, and less ads.


#5	8-25-2015 @ 06:28:53 PM
Posted By : DiRF	Reply \| Edit \| Del
#4, ...and for that, I thank you. (IIRC, I may have already thanked you in the past for using Flickr)


#6	8-25-2015 @ 06:40:31 PM
Posted By : ricerocketboy	Reply \| Edit \| Del
#5, yup you have :)


#7	8-25-2015 @ 07:01:12 PM
Posted By : wannabemustangjockey	Reply \| Edit \| Del
I keep using PB mainly out of force of habit (10 years) and because I try to limit my Flickr gallery to more artistic photos. I was one of the users giving PB all kinds of hell immediately after they ruined the site. The staff lackey who was tasked with pacifying angry members on PB's forum made no friends with his hurrdurr-I-think-it-works-fine-why-don't-you-like-it? attitude. In the end, unsurprisingly the management ignored almost everything people said except for the overwhelming demand to get rid of resource-hogging infinite scrolling on galleries. That scroll-load-scroll delay continues to be a pain in the ass on Google's photo sharing service (formerly Picasa) that I use for hosting pictures on my blog.


#8	8-25-2015 @ 07:05:02 PM
Posted By : DiRF	Reply \| Edit \| Del
#7, Simplicity is still the key to keeping a site popular. It's why Google has remained unchallenged... their main search page is simple, straight-forward, and fast. Yes, they add features, but nothing that bogs down the page.


#9	8-25-2015 @ 07:19:56 PM
Posted By : ricerocketboy	Reply \| Edit \| Del
#8, you haven't used street view in a while, have you? :/


#10	8-25-2015 @ 07:24:34 PM
Posted By : DiRF	Reply \| Edit \| Del
#9, No, no I haven't. I know Google's been dicking with their "other" sites... but the main search site is still relatively simple.


#11	8-25-2015 @ 08:13:19 PM
Posted By : ricerocketboy	Reply \| Edit \| Del
#10, that's the only one that is.


#12	8-28-2015 @ 03:36:35 PM
Posted By : ricerocketboy	Reply \| Edit \| Del
In regards to the performance of these from Motor Trend April 1992 engine: 3300 V6 horses: 160 hp torque: 185 ft/lbs trans: 3 spd auto 0-60: 10.3 0-100: n/a 0-1320: 17.8 @73.4

Showing page: 1 of 1
[ 1 ]

Login to leave a comment

	Classifieds
Click here to post your own classified ad

Want to send some feedback? Click here.
Server time: Saturday, April 20, 2024 09:25:06 AM

All pictures on this site are property of their respective owners.
Copyright � 2000 - 2024 Ricecop. All rights reserved.