|
|
|
Go back and vote on this image.
Picture
Information
|
URL:
http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=88468 |
|
Comments: 8 (Read/Post) Favorites: 0 (View) |
Submitted
on: 11-20-2012
|
View Stats |
Category:
Truck |
|
Description:
11993 Lada Niva cabriolet |
Showing page: 1 of 1 [ 1 ]
|
#2 |
11-20-2012 @ 07:46:02 PM |
Posted By : Obsidian |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Along with how FordAU and Holden use two letters for their models - I've never understood the nomenculture of Lada's cars.
Just what does 11993 mean anyway? |
|
#4 |
11-21-2012 @ 05:00:50 AM |
Posted By : Sensekhmet |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#2, No idea, it is very confusing. For example, the Fiat 124-derived Lada was VAZ 2103/2105/2107/ad infinitum... each number was given to a slightly different version. Remember that communism (and socialism, post communism, etc. etc.) was/is the dumbest system ever. If you assume that things should make sense... the joke is on you. |
|
#5 |
11-21-2012 @ 09:44:51 PM |
Posted By : Obsidian |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#4, I demand Lada's naming system to make sense!
Fuck it - I'll just make up something for 11993.
1 - 4 wheels
1 - 2 doors
9 - Cabrio
9 - White
3 - Jet powered |
|
#7 |
2-19-2013 @ 12:59:25 AM |
Posted By : Obsidian |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Sensekhmet - check this out
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Automo...USSR_and_Russia
Somewhere under the "Modern numbering system" is where we'll find out what 11993 means.
VAZ - manufacturer
1 - less that 849cc
1 - passenger car
9 -
9 - 99th model (the two 9's make 99 - duh!)
3 - 3rd varriation
I'm probably wrong. I've been reading about the Soviet/Russian auto industy lately and I think the naming system is TOO organized to be useful.
I mean it helps a lot if to organize every car made in the Soviet union at the time - but calling a car a 11993 doesn't mean anything to anyone unless they know what the numbers mean. Check out the "old numbering system". A manufacuer is allocated just 99 names for all the cars they would ever produce.
So there you go. 11993 does mean something - and it wasn't wrong to assume that it would make sense even if the Soviets were crazy.
I still think my version of 11993 would be better.
[Edited by Obsidian on 2-19-2013 @ 01:02:20 AM] |
|
#8 |
2-19-2013 @ 04:47:37 AM |
Posted By : Sensekhmet |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#7, Interesting. But Niva was never sold with anything smaller than a 1.6 I think, so... *shrugs* |
Showing page: 1 of 1 [ 1 ]
Login to leave a comment
|
|
|
|
|