|
|
|
Go back and vote on this image.
Showing page: 1 of 1 [ 1 ]
|
#1 |
3-08-2014 @ 06:33:40 AM |
Posted By : Skid |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Those wheels just don't really suit it. |
|
#3 |
3-09-2014 @ 08:00:34 PM |
Posted By : Low-Tech Redneck |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#2, I dunno, I kinda dig the quasi-fuselage styling. To me, the T-bird didn't hit it's nadir until the 70's. The styling on it wasn't bad by 70's standards, but, to put the T-bird name on just another fullsize brick of a car was the REAL travesty. |
|
#5 |
3-10-2014 @ 01:02:23 PM |
Posted By : Low-Tech Redneck |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#4, As a kid, I remember the hoopla around the "Aerocoupe" Tbird when it came out. I didn't understand it at the time, but in retrospect, it's kinda obvious huh?
I remember a few of those pre-82' Tbirds were being used as student transport during my time at University in the late 90's. I have to agree, they were pretty bad.
The "Baboon Butt" taillights? Who's idea was that? |
|
#6 |
3-10-2014 @ 05:56:11 PM |
Posted By : Skid |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I kinda have a soft spot for the 1977-1979 cars, and also the goofy little 1980-1982s. The 1980-1982 Cougars were better-looking than the Thunderbirds, though.
I think I agree that the 1967-1971s were the least attractive overall....the bodies were too low and the roofs too high, and the front of the earlier cars look like electric razors. 1972-1976s were pretty weak, too; too similar to the Lincoln Mark IVs but not as nice.
[Edited by Skid on 3-10-2014 @ 05:57:32 PM] |
Showing page: 1 of 1 [ 1 ]
Login to leave a comment
|
|
|
|
|