Go to car


Latest Comments
Car: 91522   By: Adambomb   Comment: "This brings back memories of warmer times...."
Car: Fpost   By: Adambomb   Comment: "http://www.hotrod.com/articles/1933-continental-co..."
Car: Fpost   By: DiRF   Comment: "Oddly appropriate, being surrounded by other Korea..."
Car: Fpost   By: Adambomb   Comment: "One of these too http://row52.com/Vehicle/Index/KL..."
Car: Fpost   By: Skid   Comment: "Holy shit, there's still one of these left? http:..."
See last 25 comments
 Go to

Next picture
Ricecop Home
Linkage
Plates
Bling Bling
Photo
Free Post

 Top 10

Top 10 Ricers
Top 10 Non-Ricers
Top 10 Other Good
Top 10 Other Bad

 New & Retired

Newest Images
Retired Images

 Other

Submit a picture
Profile Lookup
FAQ
Site Log
Leader Board
Site Stats

 Online Now

0 Ricecops
1 Guests

Detailed List

 Login

Username:

Password:


Remember Login?

Sign up!
Why sign up?
Forgot my password


View this image at full size
Click here to let us know if the image above is broken.


Go back and vote on this image.

Picture Information
URL: http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=90526
Submitted by: ricerocketboy
Comments: 6  (Read/Post)     Favorites: 0  (View)
Submitted on: 03-08-2014
View Stats Category: Car
Description:
Ford Thunderbird
http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7293/...ac28849bd_b.jpg
http://farm6.staticflickr.com/5524/...fe86887dd_b.jpg
http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7384/...3d9aeb4ba_b.jpg
http://farm4.staticflickr.com/3682/...0fd51a23c_b.jpg


   Comments

Showing page: 1 of 1
[
1 ]

#1
3-08-2014 @ 06:33:40 AM
Posted By : Skid Reply | Edit | Del
Those wheels just don't really suit it.

#2
3-09-2014 @ 03:10:27 PM
Posted By : DiRF  Reply | Edit | Del
To be honest, this is amongst the worst styling the 'Bird ever had... maybe I'm just bitter that it heralded the loss of the convertible option...

#3
3-09-2014 @ 08:00:34 PM
Posted By : Low-Tech Redneck Reply | Edit | Del
#2, I dunno, I kinda dig the quasi-fuselage styling. To me, the T-bird didn't hit it's nadir until the 70's. The styling on it wasn't bad by 70's standards, but, to put the T-bird name on just another fullsize brick of a car was the REAL travesty.

#4
3-10-2014 @ 12:59:19 AM
Posted By : wannabemustangjockey Reply | Edit | Del
1972-1982 was probably the darkest period in Thunderbird history in my opinion. Even the '70-71 cars are a stretch.

#5
3-10-2014 @ 01:02:23 PM
Posted By : Low-Tech Redneck Reply | Edit | Del
#4, As a kid, I remember the hoopla around the "Aerocoupe" Tbird when it came out. I didn't understand it at the time, but in retrospect, it's kinda obvious huh?

I remember a few of those pre-82' Tbirds were being used as student transport during my time at University in the late 90's. I have to agree, they were pretty bad.

The "Baboon Butt" taillights? Who's idea was that?


#6
3-10-2014 @ 05:56:11 PM
Posted By : Skid Reply | Edit | Del
I kinda have a soft spot for the 1977-1979 cars, and also the goofy little 1980-1982s. The 1980-1982 Cougars were better-looking than the Thunderbirds, though.

I think I agree that the 1967-1971s were the least attractive overall....the bodies were too low and the roofs too high, and the front of the earlier cars look like electric razors. 1972-1976s were pretty weak, too; too similar to the Lincoln Mark IVs but not as nice.

[Edited by Skid on 3-10-2014 @ 05:57:32 PM]


Showing page: 1 of 1
[
1 ]


Login to leave a comment

Classifieds 
Click here to post your own classified ad






Want to send some feedback? Click here.

Server time: Sunday, December 17, 2017 10:56:11 AM

All pictures on this site are property of their respective owners.
Copyright 2000 - 2017 Ricecop. All rights reserved.