Last 10 comments by ricerocketboy
|
Comment for image #45636
|
3-31-2020 @ 04:44:25 AM
|
| Posted
By: ricerocketboy |
|
| I can't believe these pics are nearly 15 years old. |
|
Comment for image #97294
|
3-20-2020 @ 11:34:06 PM
|
| Posted
By: ricerocketboy |
|
| I am good so far. Down with my dad in Kansas for at least another week. Got two week's leave, will be getting an extra $300 on my first April check. So far, so good. I am in both high risk groups so I should be careful. |
|
Comment for image #68437
|
3-16-2020 @ 10:17:32 PM
|
| Posted
By: ricerocketboy |
|
| Dude first gens hold their value here holy shit. These do too, but they're cheaper. I guess people don't like how "big" they are. |
|
Comment for image #68437
|
3-16-2020 @ 02:37:16 PM
|
| Posted
By: ricerocketboy |
|
| These are quieter than the first gen. MPG is a bit worse, but not much. The interior is about on-par with the first gen though. Also, these aren't seemingly as prone to rust as the first gens were. |
|
Comment for image #90609
|
2-25-2020 @ 09:02:47 PM
|
| Posted
By: ricerocketboy |
|
| taken to and from school? |
|
Comment for image #90609
|
2-25-2020 @ 12:24:09 AM
|
| Posted
By: ricerocketboy |
|
| I did the Ranger thing from age 5 to about 12 :D Not fun on 100-120 mile trips through Kansas in June. |
|
Comment for image #90609
|
2-24-2020 @ 04:22:56 AM
|
| Posted
By: ricerocketboy |
|
| I have mixed feelings about these. They're the new ricer car here, and pretty much every one I see now is terribly, cheaply modified or is sitting by a sideyard with a blown engine (as in, engine went kaput, not turboed or supercharged) |
|
