Last 10 comments by BEST45CAL
|
Comment for image #38320
|
12-12-2006 @ 08:54:12 PM
|
| Posted
By: BEST45CAL |
|
| Why am I thinking "GECKO?" |
|
Comment for image #42356
|
12-12-2006 @ 08:49:01 PM
|
| Posted
By: BEST45CAL |
|
| If that car ever accelerated too fast, the front end would jump up off the ground and the ass end would scrape the road, making sparks just like a 1975 Chevy station wagon dragging its muffler on the ground. Don't people know that looks ugly? LOL |
|
Comment for image #39806
|
12-12-2006 @ 08:46:50 PM
|
| Posted
By: BEST45CAL |
|
| I am sick with disgust. My innards are painfully shifting on their own from looking at such a vile creation. I want to die! |
|
Comment for image #25927
|
1-03-2004 @ 10:13:58 PM
|
| Posted
By: BEST45CAL |
|
| I remember those old Chevy El Caminos from the '70s and '80s with the taillights in the bumper. They were much higher than the taillights in this Mitsubishi. I'm pretty sure the lowest that taillights can be nowadays is 15 inches above the ground. |
|
Comment for image #26773
|
1-03-2004 @ 09:15:38 PM
|
| Posted
By: BEST45CAL |
|
| This particular body package appears to be an improvement over the basic Probe shape. Nice body drop. Nice wheels and tires. Close the headlights. There isn't much of a rear end on this Probe, so the rear wing has to go--it's too big for the car. A much smaller wing would be OK. The gaudy graphics have to go, too. Overall acceptable. |
|
Comment for image #25927
|
1-03-2004 @ 08:54:16 PM
|
| Posted
By: BEST45CAL |
|
| Isn't there a federal law that says taillights have to be a certain height above the ground? |
|
Comment for image #9574
|
1-03-2004 @ 08:30:46 PM
|
| Posted
By: BEST45CAL |
|
| The appearance of the front end of this car seems very old and dated, as if this was a design from the '80s. The headlights are too large and square. They use up too much of the hood area. They should be smaller projector beam type with turn indicators that wrap around the front below the hoodline. The grille is too large. Overall, I think the front end is too chunky looking. It should blend with the rest of the body without such a sharp edge that defines the front from the fenders. I like the wheels and tires. They are in good proportion to the size of the car and wheel wells. Despite their large size, they don't make the car look as if it has a foot of ground clearance. The agressive five spoke "deep-dish" design is nice. I like the overall shape of the car, but I don't care for a 2 door Charger. Granted insurance rates are lower for 4 door cars, a 2 door Charger would look much better. A Charger should be a coupe, ala Mustang, Camaro, Firebird, etc |
|
