|
|
|
|
|
This image has expired.
Final Stats:
| Total Votes |
346 |
| Average Score |
3.46 |
| Verdict |
Not Rice
|
|
Picture
Information
|
| URL:
http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=9574 |
|
| Comments: 17 (Read/Post) Favorites: 3 (View) |
Submitted
on: 08-17-2002
|
 View Stats |
Category:
Car |
|
|
Description:
Dodge Charger Concept |
Showing page: 1 of 1
[ 1 ]
 |
| #1 |
8-17-2002 @ 11:41:07 AM |
| Posted By : Lemming |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I wish they would've done something absurd, like going with the oldschool Charger front fascia (I think Jesuz photoshopped one like that).
|
|
| #2 |
8-17-2002 @ 01:22:09 PM |
| Posted By : Low-Tech Redneck |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Yeah, that front is HARSH, the rest of it is very Viperesque (well duh, consider who made it) and to that effect, I say, yawn, seen it.....
|
|
| #3 |
8-17-2002 @ 01:23:26 PM |
| Posted By : Lemming |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Square off the front like an old Charger, slap some chrome on that sucker, ant it might look good.
|
|
| #4 |
8-17-2002 @ 02:09:32 PM |
| Posted By : blackcat77 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
When I look at the front of that car, I see a little bit of Charger Daytona... I really hope they build this car, but they'll probably do that butt-ugly Razor instead.
|
|
| #5 |
8-17-2002 @ 02:11:40 PM |
| Posted By : Lemming |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I dunno; to me, the front looks like what would result if an F-body and a Dodge Avenger had a baby. (If you look at just the side of the nose, it's vaguely reminiscent of a 3rd-gen Firebird.)
|
|
| #6 |
8-17-2002 @ 02:13:51 PM |
| Posted By : Jurrell |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Those headlights don't match, change them or die!
|
|
| #12 |
1-07-2003 @ 04:34:33 PM |
| Posted By : Skid |
Reply | Edit | Del |
1. Raise the front
2. Lower the rear
3. Make it a two door
4. Drop the new Hemi in it.
5. Make the base model as stripped down as possible.
Then I would sport it.
|
|
| #13 |
1-07-2003 @ 04:35:43 PM |
| Posted By : mr_mcmunkee |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Too round. Not too bad compared to the rest of Dodge's recent concepts though.
|
|
| #14 |
12-01-2003 @ 09:59:00 PM |
| Posted By : MxCx |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I think Ill play around with pencil and paper and do my own concepts this week.
|
|
| #15 |
1-03-2004 @ 08:30:46 PM |
| Posted By : BEST45CAL |
Reply | Edit | Del |
The appearance of the front end of this car seems very old and dated, as if this was a design from the '80s. The headlights are too large and square. They use up too much of the hood area. They should be smaller projector beam type with turn indicators that wrap around the front below the hoodline. The grille is too large. Overall, I think the front end is too chunky looking. It should blend with the rest of the body without such a sharp edge that defines the front from the fenders. I like the wheels and tires. They are in good proportion to the size of the car and wheel wells. Despite their large size, they don't make the car look as if it has a foot of ground clearance. The agressive five spoke "deep-dish" design is nice. I like the overall shape of the car, but I don't care for a 2 door Charger. Granted insurance rates are lower for 4 door cars, a 2 door Charger would look much better. A Charger should be a coupe, ala Mustang, Camaro, Firebird, etc
|
|
| #16 |
1-03-2004 @ 08:36:19 PM |
| Posted By : Skid |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#15, Agreed on all but the projector beams. Those things always strike me as ugly...like Altezzas for the front of the car. :(
Welcome to Rice or Not, BTW.
|
Showing page: 1 of 1
[ 1 ]
Login to leave a comment
|
|
|
|
|
