|
|
|
|
|
Go back and vote on this image.
|
Picture
Information
|
| URL:
http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=71677 |
|
| Comments: 3 (Read/Post) Favorites: 0 (View) |
Submitted
on: 03-10-2008
|
 View Stats |
Category:
Car |
|
|
Description:
1932 cadillac V16 |
Showing page: 1 of 1
[ 1 ]
 |
| #1 |
3-10-2008 @ 04:05:37 PM |
| Posted By : thirtyseven |
Reply | Edit | Del |
We need more V16s, fuel economy be damned!
I propose a small, light, RWD coupe with a 2.5 liter DOHC V16 making about 300HP at 8K+.
I propose selling two and quickly going out of business, leaving behind a legend.
[Edited by thirtyseven on 3-10-2008 @ 04:05:57 PM]
|
|
| #2 |
3-10-2008 @ 07:36:50 PM |
| Posted By : 89Rettagt |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#1, id rather have a V12 of that size. itd be better balanced.
|
|
| #3 |
8-26-2016 @ 09:37:00 PM |
| Posted By : Low-Tech Redneck |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#2, That was the only reason for the 16's and 12's, they naturally balance. Modern materials and manufacturing means there's no benefit for going beyond 8 cyls since you can get comparable displacement (the 16 had 7.2L) with less complexity
|
Showing page: 1 of 1
[ 1 ]
Login to leave a comment
|
|
|
|
|
