Go to car


Latest Comments
Car: 92734   By: DiRF   Comment: "Its reputation in the years since, the 500X, and i..."
Car: 98688   By: Skid   Comment: "Weird side marker lights, definitely not factory...."
Car: 94316   By: Adambomb   Comment: "Weight reduction, yo..."
Car: 98684   By: Skid   Comment: "I saw a gold Accord of this gen in town a few days..."
Car: 44086   By: DiRF   Comment: "Brad Keselowski won a race today, driving a "throw..."
See last 25 comments
 Go to

Next picture
Ricecop Home
Linkage
Plates
Bling Bling
Photo
Free Post

 Top 10

Top 10 Ricers
Top 10 Non-Ricers
Top 10 Other Good
Top 10 Other Bad

 New & Retired

Newest Images
Retired Images

 Other

Submit a picture
Profile Lookup
FAQ
Site Log
Leader Board
Site Stats

 Online Now

0 Ricecops
1 Guests

Detailed List

 Login

Username:

Password:


Remember Login?

Sign up!
Why sign up?
Forgot my password



This image has expired.

Final Stats:

Total Votes 17
Average Score 5.71
Verdict Rice



Picture Information
URL: http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=5414
Submitted by: Jurrell
Comments: 17  (Read/Post)     Favorites: 0  (View)
Submitted on: 05-07-2002
View Stats Category: Truck
Description:
1999 Isuzu VehiCROSS


   Comments

Showing page: 1 of 1
[
1 ]

#1
5-07-2002 @ 06:55:41 PM
Posted By : Jurrell Reply | Edit | Del
Recycle me

#2
5-07-2002 @ 06:57:37 PM
Posted By : Low-Tech Redneck Reply | Edit | Del
This thing was obvioulsy built to compete with the Aztek for that elusive market share of drivers who's eyes don't bleed at the sight of either one

#3
5-07-2002 @ 06:58:01 PM
Posted By : Mad Max Reply | Edit | Del
Okay. Broncos, Blazers, Suburbans and the like always looked good. Then the Explorer came out. Not my cup of tea, but nicely styled. Ford's got attractive SUVs, the Suburban STILL looked good, the Durango looks BADASS... then what the hell happened? Assvalanche, Asstek, VehiCROSS, Vibe. Whatever happened to styling?

#4
5-07-2002 @ 06:59:49 PM
Posted By : Jurrell Reply | Edit | Del
at least you don't have to worry about paint chips

#5
5-07-2002 @ 07:00:58 PM
Posted By : Klepto Reply | Edit | Del
Not to mention the fact that 85% wont see a dirt road or even a rock. Putting the designer interiors into it then slapping a higher price tag on a vehicle that already cost too much and if it went off road it would get stuck. Sad Really.

#6
5-07-2002 @ 07:01:02 PM
Posted By : Low-Tech Redneck Reply | Edit | Del
Ack, plasti-bumpers are bad enough, this thing has a plastic skirt, why? is that not the ultimate syling cop-out? Just encase it in vynil?

#7
5-07-2002 @ 07:05:27 PM
Posted By : Jurrell Reply | Edit | Del
Whats up with the M-Benz G-Wagon?? no one in their right mind would take a $85,000 SUV off roading, same with you Land Rover!!!

#8
5-07-2002 @ 07:07:42 PM
Posted By : CRXtrackguy Reply | Edit | Del
Hell, people never take their precious hummers offroad either.

#9
5-07-2002 @ 07:08:19 PM
Posted By : CRXtrackguy Reply | Edit | Del
oh yeah. I would have trouble buying a truck where they only painted the top half. If I'm gonna pay $30k+ for a truck, the least they can do is paint the whole truck.

#10
5-07-2002 @ 07:08:32 PM
Posted By : Jurrell Reply | Edit | Del
I'd take a military issue off road, that way I don't have to worry about chipping the high gloss paint

#11
5-07-2002 @ 07:08:36 PM
Posted By : Low-Tech Redneck Reply | Edit | Del
We took our Explorer off road once, result? Stripped 4X4 hubs which Ford said were not covered under drivetrain warranty, it's better to leave some of them on the pavement

#12
5-07-2002 @ 07:10:00 PM
Posted By : CRXtrackguy Reply | Edit | Del
I don't offroad, even though I drive a truck. reason? 4wd is too expensive for my blood. I'd use it, but not enough to justify the extra cost. oh, and I've heard the Ford-stripped hubs story a lot. actually most of the serious offroaders I know have adapted GM front axles because of it.

#13
5-07-2002 @ 07:11:58 PM
Posted By : Low-Tech Redneck Reply | Edit | Del
We weren't even OFF ROADING it, more like secondary road with a lot of mud, and it STILL BROKE!

#14
5-07-2002 @ 07:13:27 PM
Posted By : CRXtrackguy Reply | Edit | Del
now that's just lame.

#15
5-07-2002 @ 10:50:54 PM
Posted By : cams116 Reply | Edit | Del
Old school 4x4 is the way to go. Old land cruiser put a new donk (motor) in it and away you go.

#16
5-07-2002 @ 11:14:42 PM
Posted By : Low-Tech Redneck Reply | Edit | Del
Yeah, these yuppie-mobiles aren't even worth scrap value

#17
5-07-2002 @ 11:16:13 PM
Posted By : cams116 Reply | Edit | Del
Well there is no metal on them for scrap.

[Edited by cams116 on 5-07-2002 @ 11:17:08 PM]


Showing page: 1 of 1
[
1 ]


Login to leave a comment

Classifieds 
Click here to post your own classified ad






Want to send some feedback? Click here.

Server time: Saturday, May 18, 2024 09:07:36 AM

All pictures on this site are property of their respective owners.
Copyright © 2000 - 2024 Ricecop. All rights reserved.