Go to car

Latest Comments
Car: 81412   By: ricerocketboy   Comment: "NSU Prinz too...."
Car: 81412   By: DiRF   Comment: "I can see where you're coming from in regards to t..."
Car: 81412   By: Skid   Comment: "It does bring to mind a two-door version of the la..."
Car: 81412   By: DiRF   Comment: "That is incredibly... British-looking for a BMW......"
Car: 87080   By: Low-Tech Redneck   Comment: "Push down, pull it back, and watch it go right up ..."
See last 25 comments
 Go to

Next picture
Ricecop Home
Bling Bling
Free Post

 Top 10

Top 10 Ricers
Top 10 Non-Ricers
Top 10 Other Good
Top 10 Other Bad

 New & Retired

Newest Images
Retired Images


Submit a picture
Profile Lookup
Site Log
Leader Board
Site Stats

 Online Now

2 Ricecops
1 Guests

Detailed List




Remember Login?

Sign up!
Why sign up?
Forgot my password

View this image at full size
Click here to let us know if the image above is broken.

Go back and vote on this image.

Picture Information
URL: http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=79816
Submitted by: DiRF
Comments: 4  (Read/Post)     Favorites: 0  (View)
Submitted on: 10-30-2009
View Stats Category: Car
1907 Rolls-Royce Silver Ghost.

Chassis no. 60551, registered as AX 201. Often referred to as simply "*The* Silver Ghost", it is widely considered the most valuable car in the world. Some say it could be worth north of $50 million.


Showing page: 1 of 1
1 ]

7-30-2010 @ 06:12:38 AM
Posted By : wannabemustangjockey Reply | Edit | Del
Hmm. DVLA has some issues with this one.

The vehicle details for AX 201 are:

Date of Liability 01 04 2011
Date of First Registration 01 01 1921
Year of Manufacture 1921
Cylinder Capacity (cc) 6000CC
CO2 Emissions Not Available
Fuel Type Petrol
Export Marker Not Applicable
Vehicle Status SORN Not Due
Vehicle Colour SILVER

7-30-2010 @ 04:48:53 PM
Posted By : Skid Reply | Edit | Del
It's probably been wearing its current registration since '21, but I have no idea why they would list the year of manufacture as '21.

7-30-2010 @ 04:53:11 PM
Posted By : wannabemustangjockey Reply | Edit | Del
#2, The engine size also appears to be wrong on the DVLA enquiry, as Wiki says the displacement should be 7036CC.

3-30-2015 @ 11:50:38 PM
Posted By : DiRF  Reply | Edit | Del
Rolls Royce probably fudged the numbers to get a cheaper tax disc...


Showing page: 1 of 1
1 ]

Login to leave a comment

Click here to post your own classified ad

Want to send some feedback? Click here.

Server time: Thursday, October 19, 2017 09:41:45 PM

All pictures on this site are property of their respective owners.
Copyright 2000 - 2017 Ricecop. All rights reserved.