|
|
|
|
|
This image has expired.
Final Stats:
| Total Votes |
2 |
| Average Score |
1.00 |
| Verdict |
Not Rice
|
Showing page: 1 of 1
[ 1 ]
 |
| #2 |
9-06-2011 @ 07:42:43 AM |
| Posted By : Skid |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I've always thought the '59s look fantastic from the center forward, and like a cluttered mess at the rear.
|
|
| #4 |
8-09-2016 @ 10:54:30 PM |
| Posted By : Low-Tech Redneck |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#2, As time goes on, I think EVERYONE deserves a mulligan for 59' - 61'
Almost nobody got it "right" consistently across all models/trims
|
|
| #6 |
8-10-2016 @ 08:32:57 PM |
| Posted By : Skid |
Reply | Edit | Del |
I've always liked the 1959 Ford lineup, the 1959 Cadillacs and 1959 Chevrolets, as well (though I recognize the latter two are controversial).
Also, Oldsmobile's lineup looked pretty good in 1959 and 1960, as well, though 1961 was a down year. Buicks looked good in 1959 and 1961, though the 1960s were a bit "off."
[Edited by Skid on 8-10-2016 @ 08:35:39 PM]
|
|
| #8 |
8-10-2016 @ 09:39:51 PM |
| Posted By : Skid |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#7, I'm okay with all 1959 Mopars, though the Dodge was somewhat overwrought. 1960s were good, too, though Dodge improved and Plymouth got worse. 1961 was pretty much a travesty across the board for Mopar.
I actually like all 1959 GMs. I don't find that a bad year for the General at all, other than Pontiac being a mixed bag. I think I still like that year for Pontiac overall.
I've never liked Ford's 1960 lineup, from any of their divisions. 1961s looked okay, though 1962s were a bigger step up.
I agree on Studebaker and Rambler. Rambler Americans of that time are cute, in a quirky way, but the Classics and Ambassadors weren't really lookers until '63.
[Edited by Skid on 8-10-2016 @ 09:40:29 PM]
|
Showing page: 1 of 1
[ 1 ]
Login to leave a comment
|
|
|
|
|
View Stats
