Go to car


Latest Comments
Car: 97661   By: Skid   Comment: "They're not the worst, but there are quite a few w..."
Car: 97661   By: DiRF   Comment: "They're like polished, oversized versions of what ..."
Car: 97661   By: ricerocketboy   Comment: "those wheels are awful, especially on here...."
Car: 33317   By: ricerocketboy   Comment: "Before the Ineos Grenadier, there was this. I reme..."
Car: 97492   By: ricerocketboy   Comment: "To be fair, I never understood the hate. Every per..."
See last 25 comments
 Go to

Next picture
Ricecop Home
Linkage
Plates
Bling Bling
Photo
Free Post

 Top 10

Top 10 Ricers
Top 10 Non-Ricers
Top 10 Other Good
Top 10 Other Bad

 New & Retired

Newest Images
Retired Images

 Other

Submit a picture
Profile Lookup
FAQ
Site Log
Leader Board
Site Stats

 Online Now

1 Ricecops
1 Guests

Detailed List

 Login

Username:

Password:


Remember Login?

Sign up!
Why sign up?
Forgot my password


View this image at full size
Click here to let us know if the image above is broken.


This image has been retired.

Final Stats:

Total Votes 499
Average Score 3.05
Verdict Not Rice



Picture Information
URL: http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=957
Submitted by: OldSchoolSpeed
Comments: 44  (Read/Post)     Favorites: 1  (View)
Submitted on: 02-11-2002
View Stats Category: Truck
Description:
360 hp MOPAR 258 i6 CJ5


   Comments

Showing page: 2 of 3
[
1 2 3 ]

#21
2-27-2002 @ 01:59:50 AM
Posted By : WillyPete Reply | Edit | Del
jeez... it's people like driven who make lift laws...

i love your 14 bolt, gabe... i want one too, dammit!

[Edited by WillyPete on 2-27-2002 @ 02:00:11 AM]


#22
2-27-2002 @ 02:01:48 AM
Posted By : OldSchoolSpeed Reply | Edit | Del
ahh yes...good ol' pete.

#23
2-27-2002 @ 02:02:19 AM
Posted By : WillyPete Reply | Edit | Del
in the flesh, online, and with an account.

i'm stupid enough to be dangerous.


#24
2-27-2002 @ 02:02:58 AM
Posted By : OldSchoolSpeed Reply | Edit | Del
how's the new 454? or do you have it yet?

#25
2-27-2002 @ 03:04:08 PM
Posted By : WillyPete Reply | Edit | Del
i'm workin on gettin it... i want to find a complete chevy 3/4 or 1 ton so i don't have to get a buncha crap. basically, i want to get the 454/th400/np205/60/14 bolt combo in one package for $1000-$1500

i'd settle for a sm465/np205 combo tho ;)


#26
4-03-2002 @ 05:37:55 PM
Posted By : OldSchoolSpeed Reply | Edit | Del
where is that damned cherokee...

#27
4-03-2002 @ 05:39:45 PM
Posted By : Skid Reply | Edit | Del
Chevy motor? Why? That's so boring. Not to mention what it would do to your weight distribution.

#28
4-03-2002 @ 05:42:19 PM
Posted By : Low-Tech Redneck Reply | Edit | Del
Chevy bocks, escpicaly the 5.7 are sometimes called "Belly Button" engines, cuz' everyone it seems has one, I think they get used a lot in swap-in applications becuase the oil pan sump/pickup are to the rear, so it won't get in the way of suspention components, plus parts are ubiquitous for SB chevies

#29
4-03-2002 @ 05:43:52 PM
Posted By : Skid Reply | Edit | Del
Yeah, but this is a 454 we're talking about here.

#30
4-03-2002 @ 05:44:16 PM
Posted By : OldSchoolSpeed Reply | Edit | Del
not a chevy motor in this. he's talking about getting a pick up with a 454...blah blah blah.

#31
4-03-2002 @ 05:44:50 PM
Posted By : Low-Tech Redneck Reply | Edit | Del
How much more weight will that add?? I always thought that BB's didn't weigh much more than a SB, it was all in the bore and stroke sizes, or am I off in the wrong corner again?

#32
4-03-2002 @ 05:45:25 PM
Posted By : OldSchoolSpeed Reply | Edit | Del
the owner of this jeep had a 68 galaxie 500. he dropped in a 454 and was able to spin the rubber off the rears.

#33
4-03-2002 @ 05:46:32 PM
Posted By : OldSchoolSpeed Reply | Edit | Del
Low-Tech there's a reason why theyre distinguished as big and small blocks. the BBs do add a significant amount of weight. if you're going from a SB to a BB you'd probably want to upgrade the suspension to compensate for the added weight.

#34
4-03-2002 @ 05:47:54 PM
Posted By : Low-Tech Redneck Reply | Edit | Del
By about how much? My only experience is with SB's so I really have no clue

#35
4-03-2002 @ 05:49:03 PM
Posted By : Mad Max Reply | Edit | Del
Probably at least one to two hundred pounds difference.

#36
4-03-2002 @ 05:52:51 PM
Posted By : Low-Tech Redneck Reply | Edit | Del
Okay, thx, you learn somting new every day!

#37
4-03-2002 @ 05:55:53 PM
Posted By : Mad Max Reply | Edit | Del
Look under the hood of any small-block musclecar from about '67-'72. You'll see a vast, empty space and a small, forlorn-looking engine sitting there, looking like it's about to die of loneliness. That's because these cars are designed to accomodate big-blocks. Funny story: the Ford Boss 429 was such a big engine that it wouldn't fit in the Mustang. So one of the "modifications" that took place at Kar Kraft when they modified the 'Stangs to put the engine in was a "precision adjustment" on the shock towers with a sledgehammer. Really.

#38
4-03-2002 @ 05:57:15 PM
Posted By : OldSchoolSpeed Reply | Edit | Del
the boss 429 was also Ford's hemi engine.

#39
4-03-2002 @ 05:57:57 PM
Posted By : Low-Tech Redneck Reply | Edit | Del
Another scenario, my Dad's 88' Camaro had a V6 in it, since these had to be big enough to take up to a 350, there was enough room in there to fit a couple extra passengers. My Dodge was the same way, the biggest truck mill you could get in 78' was a 440, but with a 318 in it, I actualy would sit inside the compartment on one of the fenders to work on it, that was really convenient if it was raining

#40
4-03-2002 @ 05:58:19 PM
Posted By : Mad Max Reply | Edit | Del
Didn't have as much power from the factory as it should have, but that's easily solved with a new carb and cam.

Showing page: 2 of 3
[
1 2 3 ]


Login to leave a comment

Classifieds 
Click here to post your own classified ad






Want to send some feedback? Click here.

Server time: Thursday, November 21, 2024 02:27:48 PM

All pictures on this site are property of their respective owners.
Copyright © 2000 - 2024 Ricecop. All rights reserved.