|
|
|
|
|
This image has expired.
Final Stats:
| Total Votes |
57 |
| Average Score |
3.54 |
| Verdict |
Not Rice
|
|
Picture
Information
|
| URL:
http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=1430 |
|
| Comments: 10 (Read/Post) Favorites: 1 (View) |
Submitted
on: 02-28-2002
|
 View Stats |
Category:
Truck |
|
|
Description:
No description |
Showing page: 1 of 1
[ 1 ]
 |
| #2 |
2-28-2002 @ 08:51:39 PM |
| Posted By : Mad Max |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Pardon me for doubting you, but I've NEVER seen a car this nice doing any serious four-wheeling. EVER.
|
|
| #4 |
2-28-2002 @ 08:57:26 PM |
| Posted By : Mad Max |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Yeah, it sure could handle it, but no one will ever use it for that! That's my point... real offroaders drive '77 Blazers, Broncos and Scouts.
|
|
| #5 |
2-28-2002 @ 08:59:20 PM |
| Posted By : ambientFLIER |
Reply | Edit | Del |
yeah...i was just responding to the previous pic, with a lifted excursion
|
|
| #6 |
2-28-2002 @ 09:00:25 PM |
| Posted By : Mad Max |
Reply | Edit | Del |
Well, it'd sure be better than that Excursion for boulder-bashing.
|
|
| #7 |
3-18-2002 @ 04:03:42 PM |
| Posted By : ny4x4 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
well mad max is correct real offroaders do drive older tucks but mostly because they have solid front axles(sfa) not independant front suspension(ifs) casue ifs has no flex to speak of and is realy only reliable for up to a 35" tire ...but i have seen trucks this nice in mudboggs and on trails but you wont see any rockcrawling
|
|
| #8 |
3-26-2002 @ 06:04:12 PM |
| Posted By : steed |
Reply | Edit | Del |
i agree it's not 4 off road. it's for ricers :)
|
|
| #9 |
5-10-2002 @ 10:52:43 PM |
| Posted By : Mr Hawk |
Reply | Edit | Del |
What´s the fun in bulding a competent off-roader and then dont go off-roading with it?
|
Showing page: 1 of 1
[ 1 ]
Login to leave a comment
|
|
|
|
|
