|
|
|
|
|
Go back and vote on this image.
|
Picture
Information
|
| URL:
http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=28069 |
|
| Comments: 26 (Read/Post) Favorites: 0 (View) |
Submitted
on: 10-28-2003
|
 View Stats |
Category:
Vehicle Misc |
|
|
Description:
2003 hemi with a t72 turbo |
Showing page: 2 of 2
[ 1 2 ]
 |
| #21 |
10-28-2003 @ 05:32:26 PM |
| Posted By : Lemming |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#20, That was obviously a more heavily-optioned Ram than the one I pulled stats on.
|
|
| #22 |
10-28-2003 @ 05:35:18 PM |
| Posted By : solid_snake |
Reply | Edit | Del |
yeah but I grew tired of looking and the 0-60 matched the one he had so I went with it
|
|
| #23 |
10-28-2003 @ 05:38:29 PM |
| Posted By : Lemming |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#22, Just pointing out the obvious--that the 0-60 time of their tester was probably negatively impacted by weight, even slightly beyond what it would otherwise have been.
|
|
| #24 |
10-28-2003 @ 10:38:51 PM |
| Posted By : ambientFLIER |
Reply | Edit | Del |
even being heavier, the ram has a better weight-hp ratio, and its torque-hp ratio is only slighlty worse than the titan...i dont think that should make for a whole second of difference...maybe its the gearing or something
|
|
| #26 |
10-28-2003 @ 10:42:13 PM |
| Posted By : Lemming |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#24, Wouldn't be surprised if it was mostly gearing that made the difference. Taking everything into account, they should be closer in terms of acceleration performance.
|
Showing page: 2 of 2
[ 1 2 ]
Login to leave a comment
|
|
|
|
|
