|
|
|
|
|
Go back and vote on this image.
Showing page: 4 of 4
[ 1 2 3 4 ]
 |
| #61 |
10-12-2005 @ 05:00:12 PM |
| Posted By : ricerocketboy |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#60, The 5.9L has 245HP and a nice 335 FT LBs. The 5.2L has give or take 230HP. and 300FT/LBs. The 3.9L V6 has a meager 175HP and 225 FT/LBs.
|
|
| #62 |
10-12-2005 @ 05:05:25 PM |
| Posted By : Subourbon187 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#61, That's what I thought, I knew the 3.9L had around 170/180 hp, which is kinda lame. Didn't they make a bigger engine for the 1500 non SS/T, or am I crazy?
|
|
| #63 |
10-12-2005 @ 05:06:56 PM |
| Posted By : ricerocketboy |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#62, I dont think they did. Unless you mean a 2500, which had an 8.0L V10 and a Cummins I6.
|
|
| #67 |
10-12-2005 @ 05:23:07 PM |
| Posted By : ricerocketboy |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#66, hell yea. I love it. I am that Dodge is returning to the charachter seen in the 2nd gens. I like the squared off headlights and the new front end design.
|
|
| #68 |
10-12-2005 @ 05:25:16 PM |
| Posted By : Subourbon187 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#67, Yeah, the first time I saw it I was like Blargh! But I've warmed up to it as I've done the new Charger and the Magnum.
|
|
| #70 |
10-12-2005 @ 05:33:49 PM |
| Posted By : Subourbon187 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#69, You wouldn't think that quad grille would work so well on a sports car or muscle car, or whatever Dodge is labeling it's latest crop of speed machines.
|
|
| #71 |
10-12-2005 @ 05:35:01 PM |
| Posted By : ricerocketboy |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#70, I call em "sports sedan". I know, I know, they're not a 5 series Beemer and an IS350 but still.
|
|
| #72 |
10-17-2005 @ 09:02:27 PM |
| Posted By : Skid |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#71, Really they're closer to those than the original Charger.
|
Showing page: 4 of 4
[ 1 2 3 4 ]
Login to leave a comment
|
|
|
|
|
View Stats