|
|
|
|
|
Go back and vote on this image.
|
Picture
Information
|
| URL:
http://riceornot.ricecop.com/?auto=45328 |
|
| Comments: 39 (Read/Post) Favorites: 0 (View) |
Submitted
on: 10-14-2005
|
 View Stats |
Category:
Vehicle Group |
|
|
Description:
Nissan and Subaru. |
Showing page: 2 of 2
[ 1 2 ]
 |
| #21 |
10-14-2005 @ 01:38:46 AM |
| Posted By : Subourbon187 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#19, All right, I'll admit it, I don't know shit about newer Japanese imports! Sue me!
|
|
| #23 |
10-14-2005 @ 01:40:34 AM |
| Posted By : ambientFLIER |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#21, my '02 se-r rocked...it had enough torque to spin the wheels in 3rd gear WITH an lsd...compare 180lb-ft at 4000 to a civic si's 111 at around 5000
|
|
| #24 |
10-14-2005 @ 01:41:31 AM |
| Posted By : Altima35se2003 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#22, my thunder was in the past! and it will be resurrected to exact its vengence apon ye!
It was more a general information post rather than a "ram it down ambients throat that my full sized car had five more than his compact!" post. I know I gave the specs to you but not the 'Bourb
|
|
| #26 |
10-14-2005 @ 01:42:31 AM |
| Posted By : Subourbon187 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#24, Righteous, but my lugnuts require more torque than you 99' sephia makes, haw haw!
|
|
| #27 |
10-14-2005 @ 01:42:37 AM |
| Posted By : ambientFLIER |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#24, haha, 5 more hp!!! take it to the track, bitch, she ain't safe on a public road :)
|
|
| #28 |
10-14-2005 @ 01:43:34 AM |
| Posted By : ambientFLIER |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#26, my sephia is a 1.8, so at least not a 1.5 or anything...130hp...meh, it does ok, since it's light, low-geared, and a 5-speed
|
|
| #30 |
10-14-2005 @ 01:46:16 AM |
| Posted By : Altima35se2003 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#27, when I let my friend drive it (best driving skills of all of us), he was going 45 kh/m around corners. People were shaking their fists at that damned speeding teenager careening around corners (until they realized he was going under the speed limit). Given the price, power and weight differance, the altima rapes the impala.
|
|
| #31 |
10-14-2005 @ 01:46:18 AM |
| Posted By : ambientFLIER |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#25, great damn idea...the '02 and '03 se-r's were aggressive as hell, and the new bucktooth ones with down-syndrome headlights suck...i want a new one with an '03 front end swap
|
|
| #32 |
10-14-2005 @ 01:47:09 AM |
| Posted By : ambientFLIER |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#29, 35mpg mixed driving, in need of a tune up and with 110k miles
[Edited by ambientFLIER on 10-14-2005 @ 01:47:42 AM]
|
|
| #33 |
10-14-2005 @ 01:47:37 AM |
| Posted By : Altima35se2003 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#31, ok 03. i wasn't sure. But yeah. 2001 sucked too (small but important difference)
|
|
| #34 |
10-14-2005 @ 01:48:17 AM |
| Posted By : ambientFLIER |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#33, there was no 2001...i had the first year, 2002...actually i had one of the first cars to be even delivered to my area
|
|
| #35 |
10-14-2005 @ 01:50:54 AM |
| Posted By : Altima35se2003 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#34, i thought there was no 2000 Sentra (entire model). Two of my friend's families had Sentra GXE'S. Around 2001-2003. They were similar but one was better looking.
|
|
| #38 |
10-14-2005 @ 01:54:00 AM |
| Posted By : ambientFLIER |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#37, oh, i thought you meant you want a new se-r with an '02 grille, which is what i want
|
|
| #39 |
10-14-2005 @ 01:55:18 AM |
| Posted By : Altima35se2003 |
Reply | Edit | Del |
#38, sorry, I want that too. But as for the earlier non-Se-r's, I think there are some better looking years than others (and not by much).
|
Showing page: 2 of 2
[ 1 2 ]
Login to leave a comment
|
|
|
|
|
